Comments: 35
AniphaeS [2012-05-08 11:59:01 +0000 UTC]
great job
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
packgrad2k1 [2010-12-20 20:08:19 +0000 UTC]
I like this shot, and I've been sitting on my reply since it came across in my updates months ago.
The lines of the photo, the contrast, and overall dark mood of the photo are captivating. I have to admit, however, when I saw the full version with the ghost I was sad. Personally, I like this photo better without the ghost. I think it's great without it, and having the "ghost" stops your eyes from following the dock on into the photo.
It's a good photo, to be sure, but I feel like without the "ghost" it could be great.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
crh [2010-06-12 19:42:54 +0000 UTC]
featured here
hope you don't mind / fav if you like it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
janocha In reply to crh [2010-06-12 23:08:22 +0000 UTC]
Of course I don't mind ;]
Many thanks...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
igorsev [2010-06-08 09:20:39 +0000 UTC]
Nice capture (:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
shenik [2010-05-21 07:28:45 +0000 UTC]
Bardzo ciekawe zdjęcie. Się można nad nim zamyślić. : )
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dermoo [2010-05-14 14:30:09 +0000 UTC]
Well done
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zoecrack [2010-05-14 13:12:35 +0000 UTC]
th 'ghost' really gives that je ne sais quoi to the photo.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ranklord [2010-05-14 10:50:30 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I like this one !! Great composition. Cool pattern. Everything here is combined perfectly one to another and all together create very interesting photo.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MichiLauke [2010-05-14 07:51:17 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful! Magic!
Infrared Filter? Or just "photoshopped"?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MichiLauke In reply to janocha [2010-05-14 09:03:01 +0000 UTC]
excellent work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
buzadaniel [2010-05-14 07:37:07 +0000 UTC]
Cool shot!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Faddoush [2010-05-11 12:10:22 +0000 UTC]
Very nice!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
janocha In reply to crh [2010-05-11 10:22:33 +0000 UTC]
thanks...
that's exactly what i feel about it too. it adds something personal, something 'it was at this moment, with that person' to it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
EmilStojek [2010-05-11 08:50:57 +0000 UTC]
Kadr i pomost bardzo mi się podobają. Zastanowiłbym się czy ten "osobnik" jest tutaj konieczny.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
janocha In reply to EmilStojek [2010-05-11 09:20:21 +0000 UTC]
Ciesze się. Dzięki.
Też nad tym rozmyślałem... wersja bez 'osobnika' też jest. Ale jednak ta jakoś bardziej.. bo dzięki temu jest ona również dokumentacją pewnej chwili.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0