HOME | DD

Jimbowyrick1 — Veeblefitzer - Boeing PB-17E Sea Fortress

#conceptaircraft
Published: 2018-06-24 22:37:40 +0000 UTC; Views: 7356; Favourites: 151; Downloads: 59
Redirect to original
Description Edward Curtis Wells, one of the Boeing Co.'s top designers and engineers, impressed with Prof. Anton Veeblefitzer's unique contributions to the science of aircraft design, invited his new friend, to Seattle,  to discuss the possibility of building a sea-worthy version of the B-17 for the United States Navy.
After getting snot-flying drunk, Prof. Veeblefitzer and Dr. Wells, on the white table cloth, that draped the dining table, and armed with indelible ink pens, whipped up the graphics that ultimately became the Ve-Bo PB-17, much to the dismay of Mrs. Wells, who loudly denounced the effort, as it spoiled her precious table cloth, which had been in her family for 9 generations(!). 
In mid 1941, twelve B-17E Flying Fortress's were pulled from the Boeing/Seattle production line, and had their bottom sections sliced off, and mated to quickly produced "boat" extensions, similar to that of the PBY Catalina and Coronado sea-plane designs, produced by the Consolidated Aircraft Co., located in San Diego, Calif. (this resulted in a bunch of copy-right lawsuits!).
Quickly realizing that the machine needed extra horsepower to overcome the new weight loads, Prof. Veeblefitzer, and Dr. Wells, took advantage of the newly available Pratt and Whitney R-2800 radial motor, rated a 2,000hp for take-off.
They enlarged, and strengthened the motor nacelles, to handle the new engines, and equipped them with the same 4-bladed propellers then being manufactured for the new Martin B-26 marauder.
The wing pontoons were fold-able, as in the the PBY Catalina. 
The crew consisted of one bombardier, one navigator, in the nose, with one pilot, and co-pilot, with two flight engineers, manning the the two top turrets, and the aft turret operator also manned the radio, with two waist gunners, one would man the bottom gun position when necessary, and the tail gunner.
Defensive armament comprised of 11 x .50 cal. m.g.'s.  Two were in a flexible mount located in the nose of the craft, while two top turrets housed four more.  Two more were deployed in the right and left fuselage waist positions, and a single weapon was located at the bottom of the craft, just ahead of the tail planes, for bottom defense.  Twin weapons were located in the tail.
Offensive armament could be two Bliss-Levitt 2,000lb torpedoes, one attached under each wing, between the inboard motors and the fuselage, or 12 x 500lb depth charges, or 6 x 1,000 lb armor piercing bombs for anti ship missions, contained in a water-tight bomb bay, etc.
When the Imperial Enemy attacked Pearl Harbor, the Dept. of the Navy quickly purchased the twelve finished machines, and immediately deployed six to the Atlantic Theater for anti-submarine duty, and six to the Pacific Theater.
The machines excelled in long range convoy protection and sunk many enemy sub's in the Atlantic.
In the Pacific Theater, they were vital in helping to beat back the enemy invasion of the Hawaiian Islands, in mid 1942.
Attrition finally caught up them, and they perished gallantly in combat, in early 1943.

 
Related content
Comments: 33

JRBeeler [2019-09-15 03:21:50 +0000 UTC]

OH, and that tablecloth hadn't been washed since George Washington came for dinner!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JRBeeler [2019-08-22 03:49:39 +0000 UTC]

Given what he designed, I can believe your stories that Prof. Veeblefitzer drank a lot, and got into trouble with the police too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DevinArtKing [2019-03-28 02:23:46 +0000 UTC]

Nice concept art!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JD20mg [2018-11-14 17:46:42 +0000 UTC]

Wow!  Just Wow!   Whats really weird is that the design looks so legitimate, like it would have had no trouble for approval during that period.  The only thing lacking is the side pontoons near the wing tips (like on the Catalinas) for rough seas stability.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Jimbowyrick1 In reply to JD20mg [2021-02-18 22:47:03 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jimbowyrick1 In reply to JD20mg [2018-11-14 21:52:56 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.
It has wing pontoons, they're just retracted in the pic'.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JD20mg In reply to Jimbowyrick1 [2018-11-14 22:22:09 +0000 UTC]

Oh, I thot those were external gas tanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jimbowyrick1 In reply to JD20mg [2018-11-15 03:37:09 +0000 UTC]

 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bispro [2018-09-26 22:28:05 +0000 UTC]

Nice. They actually did a flying boat using the B-17's wing: that was the XPBB-1 Sea Ranger! (evolved from an unbuilt Vought-Sikorsky project). The problem with your design, Professor, is that the wings should be placed higher to the top of the fuselage, to avoid the water splashing into the engines. I made that mistake too on some of my works, too!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DBrentOGara [2018-08-14 19:47:13 +0000 UTC]

All right! Now this behemoth has all the right modifications! 9 generations is nothing compared to the majesty of this creation! Mrs. Wells should be proud of her families contribution to the science (and art!) of aircraft design!

Gallantly in combat is the only way to perish properly! I adore this design, and their history is wonderful!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jimbowyrick1 In reply to DBrentOGara [2018-08-14 20:43:59 +0000 UTC]

"Thank you!!! Thank you!!!  Mrs. Wells has forbidden me from ever entering their home again!" - Prof. A. Veeb'

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DBrentOGara In reply to Jimbowyrick1 [2018-08-15 06:44:28 +0000 UTC]

Mrs. Wells is just jealous!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jimbowyrick1 In reply to DBrentOGara [2018-08-15 07:28:38 +0000 UTC]

 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DBrentOGara In reply to Jimbowyrick1 [2018-08-16 05:09:15 +0000 UTC]

Nice bird!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Luxomancer [2018-06-28 15:22:44 +0000 UTC]

Excellent!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jimbowyrick1 In reply to Luxomancer [2018-06-28 21:39:46 +0000 UTC]

FVTHNX!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RJDETONADOR97 [2018-06-27 16:55:31 +0000 UTC]

This airplane has an interesting design.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AzabacheSilver [2018-06-26 20:59:05 +0000 UTC]

They would have been handy in the actual war if the Marines had failed in their island hopping campaign later in the war.  They could have easily bombed Japan and flew back to be resupplied by boats!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LordOguzHan [2018-06-26 18:09:45 +0000 UTC]

Nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Peebo-Thuhlu [2018-06-25 06:36:46 +0000 UTC]

Oooo! You so want to put a couple of "Motorized wasit blister' roughly where that small door/hatch is (Where the little number '23' is painted).

www.lonesentry.com/blog/erco-t…

Also... relocate the 'Classic' B-17 ball belly turret to the ventral single gun's spot.

Bet that would bot be a fun place to be on take off!

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

Jimbowyrick1 In reply to Peebo-Thuhlu [2021-02-18 22:23:24 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

macphersonscircus In reply to Peebo-Thuhlu [2018-06-26 03:07:22 +0000 UTC]

Forgot all about those!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jimbowyrick1 In reply to Peebo-Thuhlu [2018-06-25 19:40:09 +0000 UTC]

"Oooo!
Go ahead and take my design and add you mod's, then post it!"
-Prof. A. Veeblefitzer

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Marijnvdm [2018-06-25 06:35:45 +0000 UTC]

It's... it's beautiful *sniff*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jimbowyrick1 In reply to Marijnvdm [2018-06-25 19:43:10 +0000 UTC]

SNIFF: Silly Nonsensical Invention Freaking Fun
- Prof. A. Veeblefitzer

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bluesky300 [2018-06-25 02:21:49 +0000 UTC]

Well that's interesting.... Well the Giant Fuselage reminded me of the H8K2 Japanese Heavy/Long Range Flying Boat.  

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

DonaldMoore909 In reply to Bluesky300 [2018-06-25 10:48:36 +0000 UTC]

That's why the experts said that the H8K2 was the best amphibious plane during WW2, except for Prof. Anton Veeblefitzer amphibious B-17 that is!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jimbowyrick1 In reply to Bluesky300 [2018-06-25 03:01:52 +0000 UTC]

Oh yes!
There an inescapable commonality to the designs of that period. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

macphersonscircus [2018-06-24 23:12:43 +0000 UTC]

Needs more GUNZ!!!!!!!!!!     

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jimbowyrick1 In reply to macphersonscircus [2018-06-24 23:17:36 +0000 UTC]

Hooooo-kay!
YOU take this design and add more guns, where you think that they, scientifically, should be placed!!!!
"Put yer money where yer mouth is buddy!  HEY! I like you! Wanna' fight (BUUURRRRRPPP!!!!)"
-Prof. Anton Veeblefitzer, in the local bar, at "Happy Time"!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

macphersonscircus In reply to Jimbowyrick1 [2018-06-24 23:30:39 +0000 UTC]

Let's see...a 4-gun "ala B-24" in the nose and tail, 3 gun packs on either side of the nose"ala A-20, B-25".  That should take care of it.     

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Jimbowyrick1 In reply to macphersonscircus [2021-01-03 01:15:28 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

martydibergi666 In reply to macphersonscircus [2018-06-25 20:41:39 +0000 UTC]

Personally I still think of adding a 38cm anti-shipping mortar...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0