Comments: 53
Poses17 [2017-01-26 15:53:05 +0000 UTC]
Excellent exploration—that's a really brilliant idea.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Poses17 In reply to JoePingleton [2017-01-26 19:17:09 +0000 UTC]
How long did it take to evaluate the "cloth" for this? My machine is too slow for most dynamics, alas.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JoePingleton In reply to Poses17 [2017-01-26 22:15:44 +0000 UTC]
It took a little while, though not as much as I expected with all the points in the liquid model
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
IceDragonArt [2017-01-18 18:19:53 +0000 UTC]
Oh I am going to have to find this and check it out. This is very cool!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IceDragonArt In reply to JoePingleton [2017-01-18 18:30:59 +0000 UTC]
Its really reasonably priced as well. In the wishlist for now and I will be watching your experiments with it closely
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JoePingleton In reply to IceDragonArt [2017-01-18 18:35:27 +0000 UTC]
You can't beat the price
I was trying last night to do something that's bothered me for a long time, which is to have hair that drapes when a figure is laying down, but it kept sliding off the head. more experiments to come
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IceDragonArt In reply to JoePingleton [2017-01-18 18:36:53 +0000 UTC]
Yes, that's a huge failing of hair in Studio. I look very closely at morphs before I buy anymore. the best hair I have found for stuff like that is SAV's zero gravity hair at rendo.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IceDragonArt In reply to JoePingleton [2017-01-18 19:32:30 +0000 UTC]
Do you need the link? I can dig it up for you
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IceDragonArt In reply to JoePingleton [2017-01-18 19:44:38 +0000 UTC]
Great. All of her hair is very posable and well done. I'm very glad they have kept her store up as I am have several more that I would like to purchase yet.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dadga [2017-01-18 15:00:10 +0000 UTC]
Intéressant comme résultat, joli travail
belle transparence peut être à affiner dans la verticalité des effets
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JoePingleton In reply to dadga [2017-01-18 16:47:53 +0000 UTC]
Je vous remercie, Plus d'expérimentation est nécessaire
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Synthetik3 [2017-01-17 23:51:59 +0000 UTC]
I wouldn't have thought that the water would have done that, almost looks like the blob has attacked lol
very cool results
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Laspe [2017-01-17 17:19:32 +0000 UTC]
Cool idea and interesting result!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
K-raven [2017-01-17 14:44:25 +0000 UTC]
interesting idea and result! nice
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pchef [2017-01-17 09:27:10 +0000 UTC]
beautiful water effect
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nihil-Novi-Sub-Sole [2017-01-17 06:09:08 +0000 UTC]
Nice render and funny picture!
I see you have tested DynCreator! It's a very useful script as it enables to use about every Poser dynamic props and, indeed, any OBJ model that have a contiguous mesh (some clothes need to be reworked under a modelling software to join the various parts of the mesh or they will fall apart during the simulation). The only limit I have found is concerning props that require to be fixed on some body parts because I don't know how to reproduce these constraints with the DAZ Optitex tool.
For the water shader, the last time I tried a similar thing, I used a "thin glass" shader as I found it gave better results that a full refractive water shader. In your picture, she seems to be entangled inside a gummy liquid (that's why I find the picture funny!)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Chemicq [2017-01-17 05:05:48 +0000 UTC]
Great experiment and ditto results!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thomvinson [2017-01-17 04:33:25 +0000 UTC]
Very nicely done!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SickleYield [2017-01-17 02:35:25 +0000 UTC]
What a clever idea! I wonder if that'll work with VWD.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JoePingleton In reply to SickleYield [2017-01-17 02:38:47 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, I tried it on a sphere to see how it works and thought it might look cool on a figure.
How is VWD? I have seen some samples but have not tried it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SickleYield In reply to JoePingleton [2017-01-17 03:36:21 +0000 UTC]
It's a RAM hog and it runs out easily. I wouldn't use it without Decimator, I don't think. But it can do great stuff, including sim outfits with buttons and belts etc. attached, which DynCreator and Marvelous Designer currently cannot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JoePingleton In reply to SickleYield [2017-01-17 18:12:04 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the great info, I had been looking at Marvelous Designer too, but it sounds like VWD is the way to go.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SickleYield In reply to JoePingleton [2017-01-17 18:18:28 +0000 UTC]
VWD is a lot cheaper even with the need to buy the base plus the bridge plus Decimator (that's around $165 total vs. $500 or so for MD). The downside is that it doesn't have MD's garment creation/assembly features and it is nowhere near as fast and efficient. the upside is that VWD can, like I said, handle a wider range of existing geometries with bits on them, and it can sim hair without it falling apart.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Cybersox-XIII [2017-01-17 02:25:20 +0000 UTC]
Oh, that's just fantastic!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>