HOME | DD

KenRedtail β€” An Explanation of Star Trek

Published: 2009-05-24 00:15:03 +0000 UTC; Views: 8322; Favourites: 227; Downloads: 71
Redirect to original
Description The Doctor would like to have a few words with those of you confused as to how the recent Star Trek movie affects the existing canon.
Related content
Comments: 75

VulcanRose2401 [2018-07-04 20:38:34 +0000 UTC]

yES!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Scyphi [2016-11-18 19:27:46 +0000 UTC]

Thank you Doctor, for explaining that so i don't have to. It is something of a pet peeve of mine, the people that don't understand this...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Adeii [2016-01-18 10:28:05 +0000 UTC]

Schoedinger's cat likes this!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MidgarZolom [2015-07-17 18:57:03 +0000 UTC]

Hahaha, very clever to pair these two together. I already understood how the new Trek movies worked, but this is still really fun.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DeltaWolf749580 [2015-06-15 20:06:23 +0000 UTC]

Not only does it make perfect sense, but it even has the quote from the episode "Blink" of Doctor Who. It's brilliant!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Flavius-III [2015-01-15 06:12:26 +0000 UTC]

Nice.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ArmyForTomorrow [2015-01-06 18:00:25 +0000 UTC]

yes...just yes

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ashangel101010 [2014-09-17 20:47:43 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for doing this because I couldn't wrap my head around the explanation for the "Star Trek" reboots. I was actually a bit worried because it made me think of "Donnie Darko" and that did not end well for Donnie.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Depressinglyhappy [2014-07-04 05:06:50 +0000 UTC]

I don't remember ever seeing this before but it was already in my favourites

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ThaliaKal [2014-07-01 05:57:59 +0000 UTC]

Bless you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

no-one-2 [2014-04-21 03:34:07 +0000 UTC]

I love this!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MichaelJackson82 [2013-11-02 21:11:35 +0000 UTC]

Yes, but the problem is that in the world of Star Trek, changing the past doesn't lead to an alternate reality. Every change in the past, changesΒ the future of the same realityΒ (see: The city on the edge of forever (TOS), First contact (TNG), Year of Hell (VOY) and many others....)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

LuminaBalderson In reply to MichaelJackson82 [2014-02-13 15:32:50 +0000 UTC]

You forget an episode of The Next Generation.
In this episode, Worf travels through parallel reality after Parallel Reality.
None are erased at the end.
The episode is called Parallels.

Also, it was confirmed that Reboot!Trek's time travel created a separate reality, like he ones in the episode Parallels.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Beyond-Matter In reply to MichaelJackson82 [2013-12-21 22:24:03 +0000 UTC]

To be fair, 99% of Star Trek's nefarious time travel episodes always end up "closing" the loop by convenient solutions at the end of the story arc. This case is different because the only way they could close this particular loop is prevent the black hole from ever opening in the first place.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Usagi-Elric [2013-10-07 02:11:58 +0000 UTC]

This is perfect, and explains it better than I have been trying to for a while now, thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SunstarPhoenix [2013-09-15 20:41:39 +0000 UTC]

You mean people didn't get that the first time?


-Kai

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TachigamiSwordsman [2013-07-08 14:13:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for clarifying, Doctor XP
Totally saving this because this is the exact point I try to get across to people all the time XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PsychAlchemist [2013-06-11 21:42:25 +0000 UTC]

This is proven to be logical captain.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KrazyPenguin [2013-05-27 07:39:59 +0000 UTC]

THank you Doctor, thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ScrawlMeHappy [2013-05-13 11:39:09 +0000 UTC]

Dude, this is genius. The arguments that could have been skipped had I been able to put it as well as this..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

millylove1098 [2013-04-04 14:20:05 +0000 UTC]

Wibbly... Wobbly... Timey Wimey... Stuff..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TimeKaiser [2013-02-26 06:34:37 +0000 UTC]

Exactly! I hate it when people can't grasp these kinds of things.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bags0riches [2013-01-24 03:37:39 +0000 UTC]

Nice dude, spot on

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TimePonyDwain [2013-01-20 07:15:19 +0000 UTC]

finally some one bothered to explain it to those who didn't know, nice use of Kappa there (I tend to refer to each incarnation of the doctor as a Greek letter, it's easier sometimes)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Telanana [2013-01-15 00:41:48 +0000 UTC]

That's how I saw it before even watching Doctor Who. It's a simultaneous layer to the original. This is how dimensions really work, in my opinion.

Put simply, just because Pete's universe exists, doesn't mean Rose's universe ceases to exist. Likewise, the new Star Trek doesn't stop the old one from existing. It's just on a separate plane of existence.

With that creepy void the Doctor was so keen on calling, "hell" in between.... =3=

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Aevylonya [2013-01-12 23:49:44 +0000 UTC]

This is fantastic.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nekoai-kun [2012-12-13 04:26:23 +0000 UTC]

Thank you Doctor for that lovely explanation. : D

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

IloveTrellis [2012-11-11 23:25:29 +0000 UTC]

Nice..... Is 2nd doctor explaining it to Rose?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RavaNearo [2012-10-30 00:37:13 +0000 UTC]

lol [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

XyndnyAlpha [2012-10-19 23:36:03 +0000 UTC]

Exactly how i explained it to my dad...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

knk2910 [2012-10-19 00:25:35 +0000 UTC]

Best explanation ever! Never gonna be able to think of that movie he same way again!!!!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Maelstromknight [2012-10-12 12:49:41 +0000 UTC]

Awesome explanation!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

daftpunky [2012-10-01 22:19:13 +0000 UTC]

nice one Doc! : )

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CourierBell [2012-06-23 07:11:06 +0000 UTC]

I love this. If anyone asks me to explain it to them, I'll just send them this.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

regates [2012-05-11 20:48:29 +0000 UTC]

reading it in David's voice!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

YourLocalIgor [2012-04-23 17:47:23 +0000 UTC]

Ahhh love it, two very good fandoms in one!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AthenaNightshade [2011-11-08 23:46:40 +0000 UTC]

I really don't see what's so complicated about it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Langue-Skulptur [2011-06-10 01:49:01 +0000 UTC]

LOL

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mafkeesje [2011-01-26 11:35:02 +0000 UTC]

Haha, love this!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

darthxrane [2011-01-17 09:39:13 +0000 UTC]

All the while I was reading this, I was expecting "BLINK....DON'T EVEN BLINK" to show up. x3

WIN. 83

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

punknewsie [2011-01-11 05:22:20 +0000 UTC]

WIN

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mr-Jupiter [2010-12-25 22:29:35 +0000 UTC]

this is epic! i love it... great work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ClearRoseCreations [2010-11-29 23:18:30 +0000 UTC]

Thank you Doctor.

Seriously, this cleared up some things that were bothering me about the timelines. Thanks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bonnybanshey [2010-11-01 20:14:49 +0000 UTC]

lol only thing I am confused about is why Star trek and Doctor who have not had a crossover XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Polgara87 [2010-10-16 00:09:38 +0000 UTC]

This is an utterly brilliant explanation! I'm so glad The Doctor could clear this up for me!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

deathnotefan88 [2010-10-15 01:21:25 +0000 UTC]

and btw, this is an epic win

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

deathnotefan88 [2010-10-15 01:20:33 +0000 UTC]

now that is exactly how i saw it, being a extreme Doctor Who fan and a Trekkie, and also, an aspiring theoretical physisist, i understand the multiverse to an extent, and I gotta thank Doctor Who, Star Trek, Stargate, The Big Bang Theory, and Wikipedia for that

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

syvyan [2010-05-31 13:26:27 +0000 UTC]

*bows*

the doctor speaks the truth ^_^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ArtKnife-Inc [2010-05-21 02:27:17 +0000 UTC]

YESSSSSSSSS

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

paladinofmana [2010-04-26 16:20:46 +0000 UTC]

Wow, the doctor will help me explain this to people a lot easier.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>