HOME | DD

KingsOfEvilArt — Wyvern Pseudodragon

Published: 2010-02-03 20:32:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 3066; Favourites: 40; Downloads: 130
Redirect to original
Description I think I got addicted to improving this one
Wyvern:

Pics (ORIGINAL Medieval , not fantasy stuff ):

[link]
[link]
[link]


AKA: Wivern, Vouivre or Guivre
Type: Flying Reptile (not related to true dragons)
Size: 6 meter wingspan
Habitat: Grasslands
Eats: Meat
Eaten by: Other Dragons
Breeding: Lays Eggs.


Considered a Type of dragon with two wiings and two legs, often with a stinger on it's tail.


Head & neck:
Massive, beak like jaws allow it to snap prey during flight. long neck serves the same puropse.. spikes on head protect the neck. The tounge has cartilagous stinger with neurotoxin.
Body nad tail: Body is short, what is benefical for flight. Big breastbone allows it to fly actively. It also has a hydrogene filled sacks in it's body. The back spines allow to maintain balance. Tail spines form a stinger.
Limbs: Powerful clawed lower limbs serwe both as legs and for cathing pray. Wings.. are just wings The membrane is extremely resistant to damage.


<------ For those wh oread it all!!
Related content
Comments: 18

PeteriDish [2012-03-31 07:54:02 +0000 UTC]

What immediately caught my mind is how thin and un-muscled the arms are, especially the upper arm, where I would expect a robust humerus with very well-muscled shoulder. Now it might have a big breastbone, but this muscle attachement has no sufficient counterpart on the arm.
Other than that, this is really great!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KingsOfEvilArt In reply to PeteriDish [2012-03-31 08:50:15 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, that's quite an old drawing so it obviously could use some improvement. Fortunately the next set I will upload for the folder will be newer (from 2011 already) and thus much more satisfying in my opinion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PeteriDish In reply to KingsOfEvilArt [2012-03-31 10:06:12 +0000 UTC]

Cool! I'll surely check it out!
Your technique here is great! It's an awesome drawing, and most people won't even see the "problems" with the wings, but i am a biology nerd...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KingsOfEvilArt In reply to PeteriDish [2012-03-31 11:02:24 +0000 UTC]

I am not really satisfied with techinque. haha, yes i also see many mistakes in my old works

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PeteriDish In reply to KingsOfEvilArt [2012-03-31 11:03:47 +0000 UTC]

why not? I think the shading here is great!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KingsOfEvilArt In reply to PeteriDish [2012-03-31 11:36:16 +0000 UTC]

The shading is quite acceptable but it lacks details.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PeteriDish In reply to KingsOfEvilArt [2012-03-31 11:56:13 +0000 UTC]

Simple things are beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KrexTheRevelator [2010-02-05 14:15:09 +0000 UTC]

Ona jest piękna

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KingsOfEvilArt In reply to KrexTheRevelator [2010-02-05 15:16:29 +0000 UTC]

Dziękuję wydaje mi się że to on

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

zypherax [2010-02-03 23:16:16 +0000 UTC]

still, no difinative light source... but the wings are great! I'll be uploading ALLOT of sketches tomorow...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KingsOfEvilArt In reply to zypherax [2010-02-04 14:55:44 +0000 UTC]

O yeah I cant wait

I told you it' the fault of a scanner.. the back turned out too dark The quality besides that is very good so i dont bother ( I do not scan them personally because I have no scanner)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zypherax In reply to KingsOfEvilArt [2010-02-04 19:33:52 +0000 UTC]

... BUY A SCANNER!!!

it is a verry good investmet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KingsOfEvilArt In reply to zypherax [2010-02-04 20:06:05 +0000 UTC]

iknow.. I am planning many good incewstments you know But I have no need of it now beacuse my friends always offer to scan them. And these works are not good enough in my opinion to care about some little scanner faults

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zypherax In reply to KingsOfEvilArt [2010-02-05 19:45:43 +0000 UTC]

allright...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ssectusempra [2010-02-03 20:42:10 +0000 UTC]

Myślalam że zmienisz troche więcej. No ale przyznaje, że skrzydla ma zrobione po mistrzowsku. Tylko skoro jest taka super wytrzymala ta błona, to czemu sie podarla?

Jedno pytanie: ta ostatnia błona jest mniejsza, czy nachylona pod kątem??

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KingsOfEvilArt In reply to ssectusempra [2010-02-03 21:11:34 +0000 UTC]

Błona jest i mniejsza i nachylona pod katem chodzi oto żeby koniec skrzydła byłbardziej zaostrzony bo to ułatwia sterowanie

Podarała sie bo on prowadzi aktywny tryb zycia
Reszty nie zmieniałęm bo była w porządku

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ssectusempra In reply to KingsOfEvilArt [2010-02-03 21:16:31 +0000 UTC]

jak jest nachylona, to powinna być troche ciemniejsza. Bo teraz wygląda TYLKO na mniejszą (w poprzednich kilku pracach chyba bylo to samo, ale zawsze zapomnialam spytac)

Poprawialeś na tej samej kartce, czy skopiowales? Bo ta reszta jest identyczna

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KingsOfEvilArt In reply to ssectusempra [2010-02-03 21:27:01 +0000 UTC]

Jest na chylona ale pod tak niewielkim kątem ze nie ma to zaczeia praktycznie na tej samej ov korz

👍: 0 ⏩: 0