Comments: 28
edrp96 [2012-07-10 19:35:52 +0000 UTC]
Just, KDE.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AlexandrePh [2012-06-19 18:12:34 +0000 UTC]
Can't find the wallpaper, it seems to have been deleted by the author sadly...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jarzs [2012-06-18 01:09:50 +0000 UTC]
Niceeee xDDDD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ubuntufreak [2012-06-03 03:39:33 +0000 UTC]
Wow looks really simple and beautiful !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Carudo [2012-05-24 07:14:26 +0000 UTC]
Close to perfection.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lynucs [2012-05-24 06:36:18 +0000 UTC]
The top screenshot isn't showing anything and nothing that isn't already in the bottom shot???? If we want to see the wall, we can go to the creators page. KDE makes me laugh.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ScionicSpectre [2012-05-24 06:23:46 +0000 UTC]
No drool, stay in mouth.
I hope with Qt5 it may become more performant that GNOME (this coming from a GNOME fan). I love 'em both, honestly. They both do very well in their own right. P.S. Where's the cashew button (in the upper right by default).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
muclemente [2012-05-24 02:43:45 +0000 UTC]
Really cool, love your style.
Btw, what's the name of the monospaced font? And do you use any custom font renderers? They're awesome! @.@
Ty!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
yield65 In reply to muclemente [2012-05-24 03:17:56 +0000 UTC]
or the bitstream vera sans
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
muclemente In reply to yield65 [2012-05-24 11:03:21 +0000 UTC]
I see! I was away from Ubuntu and didn't notice they've created their own suite of fonts. The mono one is really good!
Thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CraazyT [2012-05-23 12:35:34 +0000 UTC]
Looks good,
I was big into css in gnome 3.2 but now that I have been using kde and bespin it just blows away gnome IMHO.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
acidrums4 [2012-05-23 10:19:46 +0000 UTC]
How did you got the menu button with the app icon? All I've got is an ugly button with stripes!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dmiranda2 [2012-05-22 23:27:42 +0000 UTC]
Very nice!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Th3R0b [2012-05-22 20:10:17 +0000 UTC]
huh? million entries? there is one. then there is one for plasma... because these are
a separate type of apps... so they don't get mixed up. Qt supports qss since........
4.5? now 4.8 so you can style with qss (css). And kde being slower then gnome?
now you are just talking out your ass mr.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Th3R0b In reply to lassekongo83 [2012-05-23 05:15:02 +0000 UTC]
2 menu entries is enough to confuse a swede? mmkay.
Everything has problems marked as resolved/wontfix,
what problem are you talking about. Who would want
to style the whole desktop with css anyways? -You
wanna talk about slow? On virtual machines?!?! that
an argument? c'mon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Th3R0b In reply to lassekongo83 [2012-05-23 12:34:06 +0000 UTC]
Oh you mean that, yeah, so they won't make a
thememaker for qss... you can still use it
tho. And that is not true at all what they
say about qss being capable of more then
a qstyle in C++, trust me. You can do pretty
much anything with a qstyle. Plus, a css
theme is stupid, it's static. You have a
point that css on the desktop makes sense
tho. That is kinda static, you always have
a panel and so forth... so performance there
is not an issue, I believe it was suggested
at first they make it css themeable. But then
they went with a svg approach!?!?!? why? well,
you get a HUUUGE clock if you want. If you
know of any other reason, feel free to elaborate.
I don't really know of the performance with
plasma myself, as I don't use it, I don't
like plasma. However, kde apps in general
are much more faster then other apps.
If however your performance is due to high
I/O load then that should not be a problem
with plasma... I don't see why plasma should
cause high I/O load. Some nasty background
daemons like akonadi (naaaasty thing) could
tho. I hate it as I cannot use kmail anymore
when they made it all akonadi :-| sighs.
Now I'm stuck with Opera,,, I don't like it
too much but beats any other alternative
atm.... until Trojita gets multiple accounts
support. Any opinions here? you know of a
good mail client?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0