Comments: 55
RomWatt [2015-11-21 15:33:43 +0000 UTC]
TAKE THAT, GOP !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hansemist [2015-07-12 11:23:04 +0000 UTC]
WE SHOULD BE THANKFUL TO THE SOCIAL PARTIES!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SkyeLacey [2014-03-03 19:35:33 +0000 UTC]
Wrong, Germany was a socialist and great country, this is a Jewish communist country.. This the government has all the property and u have no rights.. You've been brainwashed by Zionist propaganda
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SkyeLacey In reply to Cobrawolf86 [2014-04-20 20:27:07 +0000 UTC]
we all wake up in our own time. i cant force u to ask the right questions
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RedAmerican1945 In reply to RedRich1917 [2015-05-29 21:57:02 +0000 UTC]
The red army choir also did a pretty good rendition of Battle Hymn of the republic in my opinion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RedRich1917 In reply to LordDavid04 [2013-11-03 15:58:04 +0000 UTC]
Sorry, by "your nation" I meant the fictional version of the USA you created, I'm from the USA though but no offense taken.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Phillipzu [2013-07-24 12:41:27 +0000 UTC]
Neat!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MInecraftianGuy3 [2013-05-22 03:31:26 +0000 UTC]
Socialist means equal distribution of money to everybody, correct me if I'm wrong. But socialism isn't fascism, or communism.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xlavok In reply to MInecraftianGuy3 [2013-05-24 20:56:00 +0000 UTC]
Well actually Communism is what comes after Socialism once the world fully becomes egalitarian (as in the complete end of class society which after that, sexism/racism/ableism/etc would deteriorate over time).
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
plzwork112234 [2012-04-04 03:21:05 +0000 UTC]
SSA where people sit on there asses and mama government gives them food... then kills them...
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
nnnn11112 In reply to plzwork112234 [2013-01-05 19:30:58 +0000 UTC]
Erm thats america my friend obama WANTS US TO SIT ON OUR BUTTS AND GET FOOD STAMPS
thats america
now adays I HATE repeat HAAAAATTTTTTTTTTEEEEEEEEEEEEE AMERICA
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Caturday2 In reply to plzwork112234 [2012-05-28 20:49:52 +0000 UTC]
Making sure people have a job and do not descend into poverty =/= lazy and childlike
however, doing the opposite is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TomBombardier [2011-07-03 21:53:40 +0000 UTC]
Why would they change their name?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ArtChicken144 [2011-06-01 21:48:50 +0000 UTC]
This needs to happen more than ever! the turn of the century (1800's to 1900's) is repeating itself today. Truly beautiful, my comrade in art
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Look0verthere [2011-03-28 19:14:16 +0000 UTC]
the socialist network!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LordDavid04 [2011-03-13 09:46:50 +0000 UTC]
Hey, the USSR is the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, yet they were officially Communist. So there, end of discussion, it may be two different things but can co-exist together.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CookiePenguin [2011-03-10 21:55:42 +0000 UTC]
There is a difference between communism and socialism. <_<
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dialectics-wizard In reply to CookiePenguin [2013-01-26 07:41:43 +0000 UTC]
ok show me one instance where marx or engels differentiates between the two
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
KoldGFX In reply to dialectics-wizard [2013-02-23 01:57:43 +0000 UTC]
Communism is a form of socialism, in the same way that Catholicism is a type of Christianity.
However, communism is an all-encompassing political system. There are different schools of communist thought, of course (i.e. Marxist-Leninism, Maoism, etc) but all are political systems that dictate how a nation will function. Socialism is merely an economic facet of a political system, such that there is democratic socialism (France), libertarian socialism (anarchism or anarcho-syndicalism), authoritarian socialism (the Soviet Union) and even hybrid socialism that incorporates free market principles (China). In a socialist countries, wealth and property are communally owned and distributed by the state. The political level of democratic input can vary based on the adjoining political ideology.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dialectics-wizard In reply to KoldGFX [2013-04-02 01:27:42 +0000 UTC]
No it isn't. The only difference that once existed was utopian socialism vs. scientific socialism. Utopian socialism is dead, ergo, scientific socialism remains. It isn't my fault you have a shitty understanding of it, furfag. One could perhaps (and only perhaps) make the claim that anarchists are socialists in the sense that us communists have in common with anarchists our final goal. Our methods are completely different, however, and so are our theories. There is only one definition of socialism, and said definition is "classless, stateless society of free producers".
Democratic socialism... Capitalism isn't socialism. Neither France nor the Scandinavian countries are in any way, shape or form socialist. Universal healthcare and strong social safety nets are not necessarily part of socialism, and absolutely not a defining aspect.
There is no such thing as "authoritarian socialism". The USSR is to socialism what you are to communist theory.
It is laughable that you can keep a straight face while you say "socialism that incorporates free market principles"... Capital is a critique of political economy altogether...
There are no socialist countries, nor will there ever be. Socialism/communism is global. There will be no state in socialism/communism, it is stateless by its very definition. The existance of socialism/communism necessarily presupposes the absence of nation-states. If there is a state, it can not by definition be communist or socialist, because it would hint at the existance of a expropriating class, and since communism is classless, well... yeah, you get it.
Social democracy ("democratic socialism"), market socialism and other such offsprings of socialism are reactionary, anti-communist and anti-worker. It is in the interests of all communists to combat these liberal attacks on the worker's movement. It is incredible that they are branded as socialism. It seems to me really, mind you I haven't analyzed it, that most of these middle-class rats who vote for Obama or worship Senator Sanders proclaim to be socialists out of some sort of need to rebel and appear unique... Or perhaps they are genuinely worried about the current economical and political climate. Whatever the case may be, the first step to setting fire to the class conciousness of the proletariat is to combat these liberal definitions so that potential revolutionaries do not get stuck in their web of lies and false promises.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KoldGFX In reply to dialectics-wizard [2013-04-07 15:20:09 +0000 UTC]
First off, I am not a furfag... I enjoy anthropomorphic arts, and I am straight... Also, I agree with you completely
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Darklordcomp [2011-02-07 22:18:54 +0000 UTC]
not to piss any socialist off but i'd rather die than see this happen but still a great picture
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Look0verthere [2011-02-03 05:01:33 +0000 UTC]
this is so true in todays america
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kacen [2010-12-30 05:39:43 +0000 UTC]
[link] Better flag.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kacen In reply to LordDavid04 [2010-12-30 22:24:45 +0000 UTC]
Of course it has no relation to the Socialist ideal; it is Third Positionist. That is why it is better.
I feel the dimensions of the canton should be square since making it rectangular would leave a lot of empty space. Our original flag's canton, whilst not totally square, was closer. (Referring to the Betsy Ross flag)
And for the record: It's copper not brown.
Copper Futurist Synarchist revolution! Socialism and Capitalism are both materialist, decadent ideologies!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
YNot1989 [2010-12-10 21:27:08 +0000 UTC]
Cool, most peope don't bother to work out how the great seal would change.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Filby [2010-08-29 02:44:35 +0000 UTC]
God, I wish.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JewBoyExtraordinaire [2010-07-16 15:39:21 +0000 UTC]
dude... you put the communist insignia on this "socialist flag"...
just a minor fact check
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
LordDavid04 In reply to JewBoyExtraordinaire [2010-08-30 09:29:11 +0000 UTC]
I considered the title: Communist States of America CSA but that abbreviation would have conflicted with the Confederate States of America and such. So I naturally assumed they'd go for an abbreviated name not taken.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
K-Haderach [2010-04-02 06:21:23 +0000 UTC]
Brilliant! I'm faving this and the associated symbols.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
christiansocialism [2009-05-30 17:48:24 +0000 UTC]
Frankly, a true North American socialist state cannot be built, until the native americans reclaim THEIR land, and build it themselves.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
osconchur89 In reply to christiansocialism [2010-07-15 21:30:58 +0000 UTC]
Kind of an impractical and somewhat nationalistic stance, but whatevs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>