Comments: 23
Rostov-na-don [2011-09-12 18:27:51 +0000 UTC]
Actually, I don't think they were Mongols, but Seljuks.
π: 0 β©: 1
LSCatilina In reply to AmongTheSatanic [2011-09-13 09:52:54 +0000 UTC]
They were mongols in Anatolia.
[link]
It was seljuks dissapeared and that Byzantine Empire have 50/100 years of survival OTL
By the way, yes, it's alternate history, but a really moderate one.
π: 0 β©: 2
AmongTheSatanic In reply to LSCatilina [2011-09-13 21:51:57 +0000 UTC]
The maps I've seen of Mongol expansion never show them making it that far across Anatolia, never having struck the Byzantines as far as shown here.
π: 0 β©: 1
LSCatilina In reply to AmongTheSatanic [2011-09-15 00:46:11 +0000 UTC]
It's why it's called Mongol "domination", not Mongol "Empire". To resume, you have little sucessor states suceeding to Seljuk Sultanate of Rum, under the dominance of Mongols.
π: 0 β©: 0
Rostov-na-don In reply to LSCatilina [2011-09-13 12:29:04 +0000 UTC]
Huhm... You certainly showed me something...
π: 0 β©: 0
Rostov-na-don In reply to AmongTheSatanic [2011-09-12 22:14:06 +0000 UTC]
Hmm, so you have an alternate path for a Mongol invasion. How does this contribute to Russia? I'd expect the Kievan Rus' to be still in power.
π: 0 β©: 1
mdc01957 [2011-01-18 15:15:01 +0000 UTC]
Nice map nonetheless. Any chance of a continuation, perhaps with the Greek states reuniting?
π: 0 β©: 1
Laiqua-lasse [2011-01-14 18:48:12 +0000 UTC]
It's a really beautiful map!
π: 0 β©: 1
LSCatilina In reply to Laiqua-lasse [2011-01-15 09:28:48 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, coming from you, it's really great
π: 0 β©: 1
ashimbabbar [2011-01-14 10:28:32 +0000 UTC]
Is it true ? I mean, although I'm no expert on this time and place it seems to click with what I know; but you put it in Alternate History along with No Manifest Destiny and stuff.
π: 0 β©: 1
LSCatilina In reply to ashimbabbar [2011-01-14 10:51:13 +0000 UTC]
In 1250 OTL, latin domination in Macedonia and Thrace are vanished. The Empire of Niceae, Bulgaria and Depostat of Epirus made them history.
Here, the crusaders states managed to survive efficiently, the Kingdom of Thessalonica contending epirots (who manage to crush the Principalty of AchaΓ―a).
The Emperor Baldwin manage to keep control of Thrace, against valacho-bulgars and even take control of Commens land in Bythinia.
The Byzantine Empire still exists in Asia Minor (Empire of Philadelphia, not Niceae)
Sicilia have stronger keeps in Romania (Cephalonia, as OTL, but Corinth and Arania too)
Genoa is making an hostile POP in Crimea
And Tripoli is still latin.
Differences with 1250 OTL
-Surviving Latin States
-Weakers and Divided Byzantine states
-Stronger Valacho-Bulgar Tsardom
π: 0 β©: 1
ashimbabbar In reply to LSCatilina [2011-01-14 21:44:36 +0000 UTC]
Oh. Thanks.
Do you think the Latin Empire could have lasted ? Far as I know, they not only were too few, their main skill was provoking their orthodox subjectsβ¦
π: 0 β©: 1
LSCatilina In reply to ashimbabbar [2011-01-15 09:27:53 +0000 UTC]
Everything could have lasted with the right decisionsn at the right time.
In this case, the crusaders states should have used a politic similar as the syrian one : do not upset locals, do not been the little doll of western kingdoms ,having the sense to be the heir of Eastern Roman Empire and try to act following it.
π: 0 β©: 1
GoldenValentine88 In reply to LSCatilina [2011-07-04 02:14:50 +0000 UTC]
In an omniverse, certainly, or a proper rendering in virtual space from any possible point in humanity's history. Interesting map. If Mongols were capable of diplomacy instead of unrelenting aggression...
Alexander when confronted with the idea of multiple worlds... βDo you not think it a matter worthy of lamentation that when there is such a vast multitude of them, we have not yet conquered one?β So the anecdote goes, he got horribly depressed.
I like the map. Thanks for sharing.π: 0 β©: 0
Salidas16 [2011-01-14 06:32:11 +0000 UTC]
Part of me wants ot make a joke at the Philadelphia Empire but nothing comes to mind. Anyway great map. And the idea sounds nice as well.
π: 0 β©: 0