Twiggierjet [2016-07-04 18:09:43 +0000 UTC]
What did the long crisis that you mentioned entail?
Also, how popular is techno-progressivism vs bioconservatism as a whole throughout the world?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
machinekng In reply to Twiggierjet [2016-07-04 19:01:34 +0000 UTC]
The Long Crisis is usually considered to have begun in 2029, with the Vienna Declaration, and can said to be a period of worldwide emergency rule. During the Long Crisis, most democracies either compromised or suspended their democratic processes in order to be able to endure the global refugee crisis, shortages of food, water and electricity. War and rebellion was frequent in much of the world, as states clashed over limited resources and citizens revolted against the technocratic emergency regimes. Now, with most of the world having the chance to adapt to climate change, some feeling of normalcy has begun to emerge. Civil society, suppressed for decades, has started to return to the fore. New ideologies and organizations have risen in order to challenge the technocratic status quo.
As for bioconservatism and techno-progressivism. Boconserativism is considered the mainstay in the West. The Solomon Incident, the first "terrorist attack" committed by a synthetic intelligence, mainly impacted the West and instilled many with a distrust of new technology. The de-laborization of the Western economies, with automated labor replacing human labor, also turned many against technological progress. Still, there's definitely Western countries that are either techno-progressive or have even embraced transhumanism fully. Canada and the United Kingdom are much more techno-progressive than much of the West, for example. Asia and Africa tend to be more techno-progressive, as the rise of automation helped develop their middle classes instead of squelching them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Twiggierjet In reply to machinekng [2016-07-04 21:09:22 +0000 UTC]
I am glad to see that Canada remains a shining example for much of the rest of the Western world. How does the Zentrum International feel on the subject? Or do they not care so long as their members also follow post-liberalism?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
machinekng In reply to Twiggierjet [2016-07-04 22:42:49 +0000 UTC]
The Zentrum could care less about how its member/client states feel about the subject. Heck, some of the Zentrum parties, like the Network Movement in Ukraine, are openly transhumanist. In general, the Zentrum isn't a big fan of synthetic rights, and most of the Zentrum leadership sees synthetic persons as exploitable labor.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0