HOME | DD

MarcusStarkiller β€” Tsun Tsu Class Fast Destroyer

Published: 2017-06-23 02:02:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 1025; Favourites: 29; Downloads: 46
Redirect to original
Description My take on this design. www.shipschematics.net/startre…

I made some rather noticeable changes to the design.
Related content
Comments: 25

Adrasil [2017-06-23 13:11:45 +0000 UTC]

Nice and sleek. No aft view?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

gummy-gundam In reply to Adrasil [2017-06-24 19:43:42 +0000 UTC]

I feel way honored YOU like her.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MarcusStarkiller In reply to Adrasil [2017-06-23 13:27:54 +0000 UTC]

Nope, could you make one?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Adrasil In reply to MarcusStarkiller [2017-06-23 19:26:52 +0000 UTC]

I can, but so could you using parts by me and others. (if I do it, it's going to be some time).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MarcusStarkiller In reply to Adrasil [2017-06-24 01:06:47 +0000 UTC]

Ok.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

highwindwarrior1988 [2017-06-23 13:02:02 +0000 UTC]

Named after the art of war philosopher?Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

gummy-gundam In reply to highwindwarrior1988 [2017-06-24 19:42:50 +0000 UTC]

Yes, named after him, I read some of his philosophy's on war, and destroyers being what they are I felt it was fitting. Do you agree??Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

highwindwarrior1988 In reply to gummy-gundam [2017-06-24 23:23:59 +0000 UTC]

Don't take this bad, but the ship has more of a light cruiser feel then destroyer... or a Heavy destroyer not fast... the centaur-class is more of a fast destroyer. this is much larger. I hope you understand what I mean. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

gummy-gundam In reply to highwindwarrior1988 [2017-06-25 11:14:54 +0000 UTC]

Yes I completely understand! you may be right about that, I prefer destroyer, but I will seriously give it thought thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

highwindwarrior1988 In reply to gummy-gundam [2017-06-25 14:59:58 +0000 UTC]

Its just a hobby of mine, I've been designing starships for 10 years now and so on using various scifi rules, So I guess that makes me a pro, specialist... I think. lol But any who, It could even be a Frigate lol.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

gummy-gundam In reply to highwindwarrior1988 [2017-06-26 07:18:25 +0000 UTC]

lets with fast frigate or interceptor frigate

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

highwindwarrior1988 In reply to gummy-gundam [2017-06-26 15:40:40 +0000 UTC]

makes sense, as a fast frigate lol. I hope i didnt come off as rude.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

gummy-gundam In reply to highwindwarrior1988 [2017-06-27 01:43:15 +0000 UTC]

no sir, I appreciate your input I welcome it. I invite you to check out my other ships

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

highwindwarrior1988 In reply to gummy-gundam [2017-06-27 03:17:18 +0000 UTC]

Btw, please take a look at my ships, mind you they are all mainly combat ships.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

highwindwarrior1988 In reply to gummy-gundam [2017-06-27 03:12:21 +0000 UTC]

kool lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MarcusStarkiller In reply to highwindwarrior1988 [2017-06-23 13:10:57 +0000 UTC]

I believe so. Ask .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

gummy-gundam [2017-06-23 09:30:56 +0000 UTC]

So my ship caught your attention? coo, I do like your changes, the nav deflector on mine was on the bottom and the impulse engines were not that thick. I will try to dig up my model that I made and show her detail. but again I like it enough to make a second model an A variant if you get my meaning lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MarcusStarkiller In reply to gummy-gundam [2017-06-23 12:10:52 +0000 UTC]

I am glad you approve. I thought that the engineers section needed to be more securely attached to the impulse deck area for safety sake.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

gummy-gundam In reply to MarcusStarkiller [2017-06-25 11:12:54 +0000 UTC]

I see what you mean I must modify my model now LOL

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MarcusStarkiller In reply to gummy-gundam [2017-06-25 16:27:27 +0000 UTC]

I am glad I could point that out to you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FactionParadox [2017-06-23 03:21:03 +0000 UTC]

I like it!Β  Nice, low level stance with two full size engines ready to fly!Β  I really like what you did with the smaller deflector dish array on the front of the saucer.Β  Cool looking and functional.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MarcusStarkiller In reply to FactionParadox [2017-06-23 12:09:18 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KaiserShipyards [2017-06-23 02:51:58 +0000 UTC]

Sweet

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MarcusStarkiller In reply to KaiserShipyards [2017-06-23 12:09:09 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

KaiserShipyards In reply to MarcusStarkiller [2017-06-23 17:58:31 +0000 UTC]

Welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0