Comments: 84
RoseSongstress [2012-07-04 21:12:14 +0000 UTC]
Holy-moley! I love the new background! It would almost be fun to see people on the roof or something now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
marie-berry In reply to RoseSongstress [2012-07-05 18:48:33 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! It's such a shame, Val wanted to add an amusement park background but couldn't quite get it to work... I'm glad you like it, though. And I thought in case we have any flying characters it might be a good idea to include a roof/sky area, non? XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RoseSongstress [2012-07-04 17:02:56 +0000 UTC]
Is this still getting continued or is it kind of stuck on someone?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
marie-berry In reply to RoseSongstress [2012-07-04 17:11:18 +0000 UTC]
Yup, still getting continued - we had some technical difficulties. I'm going to continue this tonight or tomorrow actually.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WanderingKotka [2012-06-18 16:19:21 +0000 UTC]
Style SMUSH, go!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WanderingKotka In reply to marie-berry [2012-06-18 17:16:00 +0000 UTC]
Of course you did! It's a 1950's collab! Who can resist that? Leather and poofy skirts all in one pic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LESimmons [2012-06-18 06:31:25 +0000 UTC]
AAAAAAAAAAY! 8D
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
marie-berry In reply to LESimmons [2012-06-18 15:40:16 +0000 UTC]
The leather has been doubled! XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SuzakuTrip [2012-06-18 06:23:29 +0000 UTC]
I would like to sign up!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kuroitenshi13 [2012-06-18 00:30:37 +0000 UTC]
Huh I wonder why it doesn't link to my name. Since I don't do it that way I can't even offer a suggestion. *pouts at it*
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
marie-berry In reply to kuroitenshi13 [2012-06-18 00:33:33 +0000 UTC]
OOPS. My bad. I totally fixed it, should work now!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
marie-berry In reply to kuroitenshi13 [2012-06-18 00:32:17 +0000 UTC]
huh? That's SO WEIRD. I'm so sorry, let me see if I can fix it!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
queen-of-rainbows [2012-06-08 19:56:07 +0000 UTC]
Hmm, this seems interesting. If there is still room, I think I'd like to join. Collabs are always fun.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ArtBySabinaE In reply to marie-berry [2012-06-07 03:15:16 +0000 UTC]
Ohmygosh, yayyyyy! I can't wait to have mine up there!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WanderingKotka [2012-06-06 15:53:51 +0000 UTC]
Ahh, this is so fun to watch as it fills out!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WanderingKotka In reply to marie-berry [2012-06-07 00:28:33 +0000 UTC]
I am too! I'm really excited to see more OCs and what other takes on classic looks come out of this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ClassyChassiss [2012-06-06 01:12:58 +0000 UTC]
Okay Im gonna tentatively sign up for this!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LESimmons [2012-05-26 05:36:35 +0000 UTC]
Hope someone goes Full Fonzie Jacket. AAAAAY!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
WanderingKotka In reply to LESimmons [2012-06-06 15:53:32 +0000 UTC]
I almost did Star in Fonzie!gear for this! Now I feel like I need to do that separately.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
marie-berry In reply to LESimmons [2012-05-27 18:11:59 +0000 UTC]
oh, I hope so. my heart will simply break if SOMEONE doesn't go full fonzie on us. :<
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RoseSongstress In reply to marie-berry [2012-06-02 02:18:36 +0000 UTC]
I'm soooo glad I saw this comment. Means I've narrowed my choices down a little bit more. I'll save SMOCT characters for the SMOCT collab.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JadineR [2012-05-23 04:23:03 +0000 UTC]
*signs*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Valendra [2012-05-22 21:38:21 +0000 UTC]
Btw, from my research it seems that pants for female fashion was introduced at 60s, and was accepted in appropriate for a lady to wear one. Addy's outfit looks more of a 60s one than 50s, didn't know if you were aware of it so I had to check with you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
marie-berry In reply to Valendra [2012-05-22 22:03:27 +0000 UTC]
Oh, actually, I stand corrected: [link]
That is a picture of Lucille Ball in pants, during her hit show I Love Lucy! which ran from 1951 to 1957. Lucy was a big, big star in her day and was considered a fashion icon. So, while the very old fashioned might have frowned at the idea of girls wearing pants, it must have been allowed otherwise that photo would not have made it to television. (Other things from I Love Lucy were heavily edited; for example, it was forbidden to say the word "pregnant," she and her husband had to sleep in different beds, and they weren't allowed to show the toilet!)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Valendra In reply to marie-berry [2012-05-23 00:26:11 +0000 UTC]
Okies then!! The references I found all were of dresses and that pants were not approved yet until 60s, so wanted to check before doing a design forehand ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>