HOME | DD
MaruLovesStamps — Bullshit
Published: 2010-02-04 22:51:14 +0000 UTC; Views: 9323; Favourites: 502; Downloads: 50
Redirect to original
Description
Premium, fresh-from-the-bull's-ass bullshit.And I could have told you this when I was thirteen. All it takes is an ounce of logic to understand that it doesn't work and even fails people who actually do remain abstinent until marriage. Just 'cause you're married, doesn't mean you want to have kids...
Related content
Comments: 241
Personally I will remain abstinent but alot of people won't so I don't get why they won't encourage teens to explore other ways to be safe instead of just pushing abstinence down their throats.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
If youre fucking while youre still in highschool your a fucking moron
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Abstinence only sex ed is like teaching a self defense class where the only lesson is "Don't get attacked in the first place."
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
North American sex ed is like "Sex? Protection? nononono, you obviously won't do that, so there's no need to tell you about it".
Aaaaand then, teen pregnancy and STDs happen.
Like, the fuck...people don't even know what a dental dam is and then they're complaining about getting an STD after going down on a girl.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
that's fine ! i think the creator made this to show that they only teach you that instead of other ways
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I've had sex ed every year since the fifth grade and I've forgotten what abstinent means again
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You know that a lot of teens, even after watching all those videos about STDs, are still gonna do it, so you might as well teach them how to protect themselves as well.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
I have chosen to be abstinent, and I really think it's not because of the physical problems it could cause, it's more the mental problems. If the boy I chose to do intercourse with decided to break up with me or if we just got in a fight, I could be emotionally hurt by it. I want to be able to say I'm a virgin until college, and be proud of it. Instead, we get all these teens and young adults wanting to bang three ways to Sunday, and for what purpose?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i agree with this 100%, respect c:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ahh, thank you c: I hardly even remember writing this lol but thank you so much
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
90's sex ed is pretty damn spooky. "NUH DUNT YOOSE CUNDUMS DEI ONLY WIRK TUNTY PERSENT O DA TIEM!1!11"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You know how our teachers implicate the "Abstinence only" crap?
They find a TWO HOUR LONG VIDEO about EVERY SINGLE STD you can get out there from having sex.
They tell you every birth control method has a 5-25% chance of failing.
They remind you that You can't LEGALLY get any kind of birth control by yourself until your 18 (or else we'll tattle on you to your mommy and daddy!)
110%, Class A, B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T!!!!!!!
Though at this point in my life I'm not interested in sex.
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
Shaming people who have sex before marriage is wrong as well. People sometimes do it even in the case of rape. Fucking idiots. XD
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
I want to wait until marriage. But that doesn't mean i see doing that BEFORE marriage as bad thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Isn't abstinent where people don't have sex until they're married? Because I think it's fine if people choose to do it, but hell if someone wants to do before marriage that's fine and shouldn't be shamed
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
In middle school we were taught that abstinence was the only responsible, mature choice if you don't want children. When a kid asked the sex ed teacher if we were going to learn about condoms/pills/etc. the teacher said "No, because abstinence is the only way." Good god.
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
They also never talk about LGBT sex/relationships, it's ridiculous.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
I agree wholeheartedly; my school teaches the whole "abstinence only" crud, and even my health teacher admitted it could be better. He said once that on his first year teaching he brought in a doctor to talk about the use of condoms and got in trouble for it. When I heard that my immediate thought on it was, "Why?" Seriously, he was allowed to show us very graphic images of STD's yet still wasn't allowed to teach us about contraceptives. Normally I'm not one to criticize what my school does, but that was just dumb.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
I still don't understand how you can teach something like this in school. Like, if our teacher would've done that the whole class would've collectively shown him the bird.
A gynecologist actualy spend two school lessons answering our questions (which were sometimes a bit dumb....Like, how do twins decide which one is born first, or what happens if one of the twins gets stuck....*sigh*).
Real/Right education is still the best protection.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Not long ago at school (I go to a Catholic school.. my family's Catholic.), we had this lady come up and waste an entire period of learning on "no sex before marriage" (it was my science period too, so I got really pissed.. it's my best/favorite subject)
Sooooo, basically, we're not allowed to have control over our bodies and have to wait for a choice that might not happen to have sex?
She even stated "If you have sex before marriage, you WILL get and STD"
I wanted to fall asleep during that presentation but I just couldn't because for some reason, I just LOVE listening to idiots speak so I can get pissed off and rant later. I guess I just love to rant.
But if you don't wanna have sex before marriage, that's totally fine.
Just don't force everyone on the planet to do the same thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
If i want to have sex at 25 and not married I will damn right have sex.
Safe sex that is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
It does nothing to sate ignorance about sex, and STDs.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I think you misunderstood. This isn't about those who chose to be abstinent, it's about the schools who teach abstinence only. Those who don't want to be abstinent go ahead and have sex, and, unless taught by a parent or somewhere else, without being taught about safe sex usually have unsafe sex and would sometimes result in a pregnancy or STD.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Scratch the part where I said I never heard of it. I just realized that when I moved to Texas that was all they talked about in those programs. I just ignored the whole thing and texted the whole time so I didn't notice right away.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ah XD I was just commenting on this one after looking at lots of stamps that said abstinence is stupid XD probably the most unrelated one to comment on I know. I should've read it better instead of just reading "abstinence" and being like wow really another one
I've never heard of a program that just teaches abstinence though, that's pretty odd. It's too bad the abstinence education doesn't work though.. the world is a.. liiittle too slutty these days.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LookAtMyLittlePoneh Yes, lust is normal, but please don't be a slut about it. Just because one is aroused, doesn't mean they should fuck every chick they see (sarcastic statement there of course). I would masturbate, I ain't having sex with anyone until I'm old enough (and that would be with the one I truly love).
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Lust is WRONG-
Lust is wrong? Lust is neutral. It's a thing that humans just happen to have and we mysteriously have more control over what happens when lust boils over and two or more parties come to an agreement; which is something sexual, then we have the evolved ideas of consent and different consensual instructions, we can stop in between, we can change things up and we are aware of our sexual processes much more than any other common mammal. It's neither here nor there, and you can choose to act on it, or repress it and deny it sure...but you can't deny you're a mammal and unless you are asexual/have an extremely low sex drive you will have some sexual desires in your lifetime.
Plus I'm going to get into sticky details, but even between man and wife which people like yourself I see claim is the only good route for sex; they can't please each other or create babies if just the man at least is not aroused; it's basic biology. Just to make this frank, his dick has to be hard, or there's no cum which equals no sperm which equals no fertilisation which means no baby. Hehe, run and tell THAT to people who hump family values copiously. We're all perverted in some ways, mate, (except asexuals, which is what you sound like) sorry to burst your bubble. It's NATURAL to be "perverted". I mean if you want the husband and wife to share the intimate bond they are supposed to be having which includes martial sex; why break the deal and say they can have sex but can't have lust?
That makes absolutely no sense, I'm sorry more sticky details ahead but I'm pretty sure your average lady (moi included) is gonna pissed off when they find out only the guy can get his, and she'll want pleasure too, and then they are BOTH committing lust, and sex can't even happen without it, because you need lustful action and intent to get people aroused for a session of da love makin'. Then when they ARE aroused the married couple are sinning their dirty way through the marital bed and then they come so I guess they are doubly charged. But they could've been making love gently to each other and expressing their love through their bodies, or they like it rough, but I know it's not my place to poke my nose unless I'm part of that married couple. Apparently it's rightfully yours. I'd beg to differ. That couple could be very happy with what they just did, most likely.
As for lust being connected to rape, rape is not a sexuality, it's a dangerous fetish, an invasion of privacy and bodily autonomy, and most likely is a terror/psychological crime on another person for whatever pitiful motive that the rapist may hold. I do not hold much sympathy for rapists. They damage a sense of control and autonomy in the victim's life and it has dire side-effects for the rape victim. Don't believe me? Ask and I'll list them here. But the fact rape is bad is pretty much a no-brainer; you seem to be simplifying the issue at hand. It's not as simple as lust. Rape is the TRUE sexual perversion here and NOT lust between willing parties. Please don't make that mistake. Lust doesn't cause rape, deeply disturbed people DO.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Rape has absolutely nothing to do with lust, nor is it caused by lust. It's about power and/or dominance over another person, period.
It sounds like you were raised to have very negative views on sex and physical attraction. That's unfortunate. Even the Bible has an entire book devoted to celebrating sex and physical attraction for your partner as a gift from God. Within the bind of marriage in that context, of course, but still a gift from God.
All of the states that are "abstinence only" have much higher teen pregnancy rates than states that require comprehensive sex ed. Knowing about something in and of itself doesn't make you run out and do it. Ignorance of the risks and consequences of something will make someone less likely to NOT do something, though.
Abstinence only sex ed will NEVER work because sex is a basic human drive and need, and while you may find it easy to be abstinate (I did, too, as a teen), it's not that easy for everyone because of that fact. Furthermore, sex in and of itself isn't perversion. Lust isn't perversion or WRONG across the board, either. You could be married to your soul mate and still lust after them by thinking they're sexy as hell. All romantic love has a degree of physical attraction to it, and there's nothing wrong with that.
Along those same lines, not all teens who have sex do it out of pure meaningless lust. Yes, some teens have sex just because they think somebody is hot and they're horny from their raging hormones, but there are just as many teenaged couples who have sex because they really do think they're ~~in loooove~~ with their partner. There's nothing perverted about that.
Reducing sex ed to "Don't have sex because it's wrong and lustful and perverted, mkay?" is not only narrow minded and incorrect, it's straight up DANGEROUS. The amount that teens DON'T know about sex, contraceptives, STDs, and even their own bodies is downright frightening. I saw it all the time on a women's health community I was a member of. Girls posted right and left believing myths like "you can't get pregnant the first time you have sex/if you're on your period/if you're standing up/if you're in water", that it's better to use two condoms instead of one (or that condoms aren't even all that important!), asking if you can get pregnant from swimming in a pool somebody ejaculated in or even from sitting on a toilet seat somebody ejaculated on, etc. And then parents and school districts are SHOCKED when these girls end up pregnant or with an STD.
You want to keep teens from having sex? Explain STDs to them. Explain all of them as graphically as possible, with uncensored photos of what happens when they're left untreated. If that doesn't make them avoid having sex or at least thinking twice before doing so, it sure as hell will make them use protection!
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Pull your head out of your ass
Rape is NOT a sex act
It's a hate crime and it's an act of dominance
lust has nothing to do with it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Do you even know what the fuck rape is?
IT'S UNCONSENTUAL SEX.
SEX.
SOMEBODY WANTED TO FUCK SOMEONE ELSE AND THAT SOMEONE ELSE DIDN'T WANT TO.
LUST HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH IT, MMK?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Friend don't get so angry, I'm against rape so calm the fuck down.
It's not about lust, trust me.
It's done for power and control, it's a hate crime, not a sex act.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The literal definition of rape is unconsentual sex.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yes, but it's NOT A SEX ACT. Do you understand? Do you need to do a quick google search to figure it out?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ok, this makes no sense.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okay, let me try to elaborate.
(Some) People rape because they want to feel empowered over the person they are raping. They want to feel dominant.
It's a "look what I can do to you" crime. Out of hatred and power. It's an act of terrorism towards an individual. They want to instill fear and terror into you. See why it's a hate crime and not a sex act? Rapists don't simply rape because they "have lust for" the victim. If they did, then it would be a sexual crime.
Yes, it's consensual sex.
No, however, it's not done out of sexual desire.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
I think that you are half right. It is very much a power thing, but that aside, it is also desire or lust. It can be both. Not everyone is going to rape someone simply because they want to have power. Some do it because they are lustful. So you are right. I think that power is a reason for someone to rape. But so is desire. And I'm sure there are many more reasons for someone to rape someone else. And I'm guessing that there are many reasons behind a rape, that it's not just one thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
correction....
"yes, it's non-consensual sex"
ye forgot the non part...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>