HOME | DD

mat3jko — ATV 02.

Published: 2008-09-14 13:20:48 +0000 UTC; Views: 4767; Favourites: 50; Downloads: 160
Redirect to original
Description M. Pechac ..

Quad Cup - Senkvice
Related content
Comments: 59

mat3jko In reply to ??? [2010-06-22 14:15:44 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

x-m4n [2010-02-15 15:33:49 +0000 UTC]

tieto fotky stvorkoliekk ti fakt idu

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

mat3jko In reply to x-m4n [2010-02-15 16:31:02 +0000 UTC]

dik

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

x-m4n In reply to x-m4n [2010-02-15 15:34:37 +0000 UTC]

ale nie len tie dufam ze stebou mozem buduci rok ratat stebou na spolupraci na table "D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZoleeS [2010-01-04 18:58:09 +0000 UTC]

respect thats all i can say

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to ZoleeS [2010-01-04 19:47:00 +0000 UTC]

thank you my friend!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BRANKY [2008-10-01 19:28:29 +0000 UTC]

krásna fotka, vidieť, že sa tomu venuješ vážnejšie, používaš 40D???

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to BRANKY [2008-10-01 19:39:11 +0000 UTC]

dik dik,, venujem a dolezite je ze ma to bavi

jj canon 40D

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BRANKY In reply to mat3jko [2008-10-01 19:43:17 +0000 UTC]

JA som si tiež kúil asi niečo pred mesiacom 40D s TAMRONom 17-50mm, TY má kitové sklo alebo si volil niečo lepšieho?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to BRANKY [2008-10-01 21:07:13 +0000 UTC]

zatial kitove 17-85.. no brusim zuby na 70-200 is 2.8 a este 16-35 2.8 oba Lkove..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BRANKY In reply to mat3jko [2008-10-01 21:19:22 +0000 UTC]

neviem presne čo myslíš pod pojmom Lkové

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to BRANKY [2008-10-01 22:36:48 +0000 UTC]

najvyssia rada a kvalita

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BRANKY In reply to mat3jko [2008-10-02 15:31:29 +0000 UTC]

hmm, nevšimol som si nikdy takéto označovanie, viem že čím väčšia diera tak tým kvalitnejšie a zároveň drahšie sklo

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to BRANKY [2008-10-02 16:54:37 +0000 UTC]

cim vecsia diera? rofl to co mam ako chapat loooool

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BRANKY In reply to mat3jko [2008-10-02 18:17:31 +0000 UTC]

D myslel som tým svetlosť napr. JA mám 2,8 čo nie je až taká veľka diera D ale postačuje zatiaľ na moje účeli zatiaľ podotýkam... čím menšie číslo tým väčšia diera D
tu si ho môžeš pozrieť [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to BRANKY [2008-10-02 21:07:04 +0000 UTC]

tak povim svetelnost a nie diera lolo ..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BRANKY In reply to mat3jko [2008-10-03 23:06:20 +0000 UTC]

sorry sir

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

3onE [2008-09-21 02:02:35 +0000 UTC]

lubi sa aj so stromom

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to 3onE [2008-09-21 08:05:18 +0000 UTC]

aj mne

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

image-resizer [2008-09-17 14:33:55 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to image-resizer [2008-09-17 15:08:38 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djd-t [2008-09-16 15:24:52 +0000 UTC]

nejlepsi...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to djd-t [2008-09-16 15:41:42 +0000 UTC]

jj tahle jedina se povedla :/

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Swakoo [2008-09-15 19:36:58 +0000 UTC]

pekná

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to Swakoo [2008-09-15 19:50:58 +0000 UTC]

dik

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ChristopherMurr [2008-09-15 00:40:12 +0000 UTC]

Definitely one of my faves of the action photography. Fabulous setting and colors. The location and colors really just come together.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to ChristopherMurr [2008-09-15 09:14:51 +0000 UTC]

thank you man I'm glad that u like it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BOsKiKroKodyL [2008-09-14 18:13:59 +0000 UTC]

whoa nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to BOsKiKroKodyL [2008-09-14 18:57:12 +0000 UTC]

thx

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

36m [2008-09-14 18:09:13 +0000 UTC]

dokonale bro.., uz len vyretusovat ten strom..
FAF..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to 36m [2008-09-14 18:59:03 +0000 UTC]

dik bro .. mam aj zopar kde je v pozadi daka fabrika divna bez stromu tak poskusam ale ten strom sa mi tam nejak hodil proste stay tuned a uvidis dalsie )

A ZDVIHNI MI TELEFON KONECNE! CEZ TYZDEN DAME UZ TEN MEETING

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

yagizyilmaz [2008-09-14 16:13:31 +0000 UTC]

Wtf (:

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to yagizyilmaz [2008-09-14 18:59:08 +0000 UTC]

what wtf?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

yagizyilmaz In reply to mat3jko [2008-09-14 21:33:01 +0000 UTC]

b, e, a, utiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to yagizyilmaz [2008-09-14 22:09:40 +0000 UTC]

now i understand hehe thx

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Semtex-182 [2008-09-14 15:57:46 +0000 UTC]

je to hezka fotka.. po technicky strance super .. barvy ok .. ale ty voe fot třeba MX a ne furt jen quad. ..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to Semtex-182 [2008-09-14 18:59:27 +0000 UTC]

na mx nechodim to je nuda 4kolky sou hezci a navyse ich jazdia pekne zeny ;D

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Semtex-182 In reply to mat3jko [2008-09-14 20:24:58 +0000 UTC]

proč nuda? třeba taky fmx je pecka..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to Semtex-182 [2008-09-14 22:09:30 +0000 UTC]

fmx mozna.. ale nejake preteky to ne to je nuda

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Semtex-182 In reply to mat3jko [2008-09-15 11:35:15 +0000 UTC]

bike je stejně da best

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to Semtex-182 [2008-09-15 11:42:54 +0000 UTC]

heh nechces kupit moj? predavam akurat

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Semtex-182 In reply to mat3jko [2008-09-15 14:05:17 +0000 UTC]

heh to asi ne... co mas NSko? ja mam specialized p.3 ... tak nevim no

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to Semtex-182 [2008-09-15 14:06:04 +0000 UTC]

jj ns bitch pink

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Gaa-ra [2008-09-14 15:23:31 +0000 UTC]

je to super ale prijde mi ze u techle quad fotek mas silene vyrazny pozadi coz mne odtahuje oci od hlavniho ojektu takze bych bud pozadi trosku vic rozostril nebo ubral na saturaci nebo oboji

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to Gaa-ra [2008-09-14 19:00:05 +0000 UTC]

to by dopadlo jazdec pekne farebny a pozadie nie lol .... je aj zopar ostrych no tieto preteky som nefotil s teleobjektivom takze rozostreneho pozadia sa nedockas

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gaa-ra In reply to mat3jko [2008-09-14 19:37:42 +0000 UTC]

tak ale nevyrazny neznamena hnusny a doorozostrit (hnusny slovo ) sofwarove no

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to Gaa-ra [2008-09-14 19:46:06 +0000 UTC]

softverove rozostrenie nevyzera fajn

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

patrezz [2008-09-14 13:25:47 +0000 UTC]

je to super
ale zaujimalo by ma kolko tie fotky upravujes :-D
ci ty tak dobre fotis ? :-P

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mat3jko In reply to patrezz [2008-09-14 13:36:38 +0000 UTC]

aj dobre fotim ale takto to neodfotis .. kolko? od hodiny az po cely den niekedy hehe ale ne.. tato cca 1-2 hodky...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

dexter13-sk In reply to mat3jko [2008-09-15 11:11:14 +0000 UTC]

No dost, osobne uz 1-2hod upravu povazujem za manipulaciu, ale to je vec nazoru. Sice neviem, co na tom tak dlho trvalo, ale nieco podobne dosiahnes aj s polarizacnym filtrom.

ps: na DA ma toto trochu stve, odlisit fotografovanie od upravy. Presiel som tvoje fotky a trochu sa lisis vo vlastnych nazoroch. Na jednej strane pouzijes bodypaint ciernu, aby si to nemusel upravovat a vyrabat umelinu, na inych fotkach ju ale vyrabas. Z toho mi vyplyva zbytocne natieranie, kd to spravis aj za 1h v softe podla nazoru c.2 atd. Napodobny nazor zdielam aj na HDR, pri ktorom z hocijakej "shits" fotky spravis "fairytaile" tym nemyslim tvoje ale celkovo, viem co dokaze photomatix a videl som fotky lesa ktore by som okamzite mazal premenit sa na nadheru a podob.

btw. pekna kompozicia

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>