HOME | DD

Medjoe β€” Aermacchi MC-208 ''Tuono''

#aermacchi #aircraft #fighter #jetfighter #whatif #italianairforce #regiaaeronautica #alternatehistory
Published: 2015-10-24 00:32:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 1380; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description The Aermacchi MC-208 combined the newly-developed Jumo 004 turbojet with the MC-202/205 airframe, resulting in a nimble fighter aircraft that proved itself across the Mediterranean theatre of operations against Allied squadrons, then, as the war moved on, clashes against the Luftwaffe. Armament was switched for two 20mm autocannons, offering better offensive ability, which coupled with good aerodynamics and superior speed made it a dangerous foe in the skies. It was a contemporary of the jet-powered Bf109-J "Meteor", and the two were very comparable in role and performance. Though produced in limited quantities due to scarce resources, it allowed the Royal Italian Air Force to further improve their jet aircraft designs.Β After the war, the overall design proved itself as an inspiration for first-generation jet fighters.

This aircraft carries the emblem of the 162a Squadriglia, a hissing black cat, and is flying across uncertain clouds. The aircraft earned its "Tuono"- thunder- nickname for the deafening roar of its turbojet.


After the MB-342, I couldn't resist taking another crack at the Regia Aeronautica, and wanted to try out another one of their beautiful camo patterns. Historically, the MC-200 Saetta was relatively underpowered and things changed greatly once the Daimler-Benz piston engines made their way on Italian aircraft. Naturally, this led me to ponder on the introduction of German turbojets in Italian aircraft in a similar manner, leading to a relatively quick adaptation on an existing airframe. Since I had already done something similar with the IAR series, the adaptation was not very difficult. This opens up more opportunities with the other prominent Italian fighters of the time, the Reggiane Re2005 and the Fiat G55. The MC-208 designation was chosen because from my quick research on the topic, there were already plans for the 206 and 207 that were discovered during the war, and I didn't want to create too much overlap with already existing plans. It helped to have a physical scale model as reference, and allowed me much better accuracy in the proportions and angles (horizontal stab might seem crooked, but it's the wing sweep that gives that illusion - trust me, I checked!) All in all, this was a fun ride, and I bet a real one would be even more fun!
Related content
Comments: 11

TheArmsDealer [2018-04-18 00:38:53 +0000 UTC]

Nice concept, maybe the MC-208 and the Fiat G.69 could be competing designs for the Regia Aeronautica in a continued WW2 scenario.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Medjoe In reply to TheArmsDealer [2018-04-18 00:58:16 +0000 UTC]

Hm, I do not recall if for my two Regia Aeronautica designs I had planned them to appear later than the 1943 armistice, but most certainly that there would have been just as much interest in a contract similar to the Serie 5 developments.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheArmsDealer In reply to Medjoe [2018-04-18 01:02:47 +0000 UTC]

Interesting.Β  Have you ever considered make MS Paint mockups of them?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Medjoe In reply to TheArmsDealer [2018-04-18 01:11:47 +0000 UTC]

I have considered using digital layers to experiment with various schemes (the Regia Aeronautica has some interesting ones, but even in general). It might certainly cut time at the conceptual stage to pick a subject to draw, but I am not well-versed with the digital side to be able to do it. As for 3-view or side-view templates, I don't know how I could do them aside efficiently. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ZephyrTheFox24 [2015-11-15 23:07:26 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful jet fighter! Definitely deserves to be in the Dieselpunk universe

I actually have one that you might like with 4 20 mm autocannons and a 40 mm autocannon:

alucard234564.deviantart.com/a…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Medjoe In reply to ZephyrTheFox24 [2015-11-15 23:40:26 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for the comment! Strictly speaking, it's not powered by diesel, and it's not very art deco, but it's in about that time period (dieselpunk is much more Interbellum, or at least that's how I see it)Β Β 

Perhaps my main concern with this design is the forward fuselage and the jet exhaust, it may be a bit too compressed beneath the cockpit, and not low enough for the intake; then again, I haven't been as diligent as to check its viability with appropriate blueprints. Some imagination is required to bind it togetherΒ Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ZephyrTheFox24 In reply to Medjoe [2015-11-19 19:39:49 +0000 UTC]

Your design would still be a great fighter if it were to actually be built IF WW2 possibly continued into the late 40s-early 50s.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Medjoe In reply to ZephyrTheFox24 [2015-11-20 00:11:04 +0000 UTC]

Indeed, at the very least it would've given the Allies a run for their money!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ZephyrTheFox24 In reply to Medjoe [2015-12-22 16:12:15 +0000 UTC]

And if WW2 went into the late 40s, the p-80 would have seen act

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Medjoe In reply to ZephyrTheFox24 [2015-12-22 20:50:23 +0000 UTC]

True, not to mention the development of British jet engines as well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ZephyrTheFox24 In reply to Medjoe [2015-12-25 01:34:02 +0000 UTC]

And the Me-262 would have met its match.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0