HOME | DD

Medjoe — IAR 88A Acvila

#aircraft #aviation #fighter #iar #interceptor #jetaircraft #romania #whatif #roaf #romanianairforce #forteleaerieneromane #alternatehistory
Published: 2016-10-05 02:26:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 2714; Favourites: 70; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description The MiG 21 saw a vast introduction into various Soviet Bloc countries, among them Romania. Following the latter's refusal to participate in Operation Danube in 1968, foreign relations with Western countries began opening, along with opportunities of licensed production, namely from the French aeronautical industry in the form of Aérospatiale helicopters. The arrival of the MiG 21 MF variants into the Romanian Air Force led to a redesign of the MiG 21 airframe to incorporate design elements of the French Mirage fighters, the most notable changes being the revised intakes and a full nosecone for a better radar. An unsupported effort by the USSR, the early stages of the program led to procurement issues of the Tumansky turbojets, until finally a deal was struck for their provision.

The IAR 88, dubbed Acvilă - eagle -, by the air force, quickly earned the NATO reporting name "Flint". It was deployed and served with all active units, becoming the workhorse of the RoAF for many decades to come, filling a multitude of roles ranging from ground attack to air superiority. Subsequently, a number of them underwent modernisation in the form of improved avionics under the SpeaR program. This particular model bears the post 1984-roundel, with a ground camouflage inspired by the MiG 23s in service at the time.

Historically, the indigenous Romanian aeronautical industry suffered major setbacks after WW2, when it was forced to scrap its IAR-80/81 fleet and replace it with various Soviet fighters (Mig-15/17/19/21/29, Yak-17/23, etc). Some factories had to divert production towards agricultural equipment and licensed Soviet aircraft such as the Kamov-126. And it's free game up to IAR-92 for other designs. 
Related content
Comments: 16

eightyator [2019-05-10 14:21:01 +0000 UTC]

What a fascinating airplane! I did not know about this unique design, so thank you for your description. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ElSqiubbonator In reply to eightyator [2021-07-23 00:48:25 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eightyator In reply to ElSqiubbonator [2021-07-23 00:50:35 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Stevie-The-Fixer [2016-10-08 19:07:42 +0000 UTC]

Nice depiction an very interesting history of it. I notice the proximate splitters needed at the intakes (like most side intake aircraft) and the forward position of the airbrakes. It would be a potent beast of an aircraft.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Medjoe In reply to Stevie-The-Fixer [2016-10-08 20:55:25 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, the IAR 88 was something I wanted to do for a good number of months! Yes, the bulk of the airframe is based on a MiG 21 bis, especially around the underside. As for the side intakes, they are directly inspired by the Mirage III's. That said, I consciously chose to keep the cross-section in front about the same (for a closer resemblance with the MiG), whereas the Mirage fuselage is much narrower in front.
One has to wonder how such a design would fare at the supersonic afterburner speeds that the originals were able to reach.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Stevie-The-Fixer In reply to Medjoe [2016-10-10 13:21:00 +0000 UTC]

Yes - good point about supersonic speeds - great subject. If I could make visual models I would create one for a flightsim but if someone else ever does i can help with other aspects - would be great to see it "flying".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Medjoe In reply to Stevie-The-Fixer [2016-10-11 00:29:31 +0000 UTC]

Oh yes, that would be incredible! Unfortunately I'm not very experienced with CAD work (or even scratch building for that matter) so for the time being the only way to flesh out my concepts is via drawings... That said, I'm not familiar with how flight sims take into account the geometry of the intakes, there may be some tricky calculations involved there for an optimised airstream flowing in the compressor... Still, seeing workable models of one's concept, either virtual or real, would be the most thrilling rendition short of an actual plane or tank!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZephyrTheFox24 [2016-10-07 06:01:49 +0000 UTC]

Nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Medjoe In reply to ZephyrTheFox24 [2016-10-07 13:34:37 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Heart-und-Seoul [2016-10-06 13:14:06 +0000 UTC]

So this is a modernized one?  It doesn't have the air intakes of the original MiG 21...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Medjoe In reply to Heart-und-Seoul [2016-10-06 14:37:48 +0000 UTC]

That's correct, the air intake layout is inspired by the Mirage III, which would remove any air conduits in the front of the aircraft. Of course, this brings both benefits and disadvantages, so it's always a matter of trading something for another. On one hand, there's a drag penalty with the larger cross-section required, but on the other it would free up the front for a greater avionic loadout... 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dave-llamaman [2016-10-05 15:09:36 +0000 UTC]

Like it. I came up with a similar design in pixel art for a joint Yugoslav-Romanian fighter based on the MiG-21bis, camo scheme wasn't as nice as yours though

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Medjoe In reply to dave-llamaman [2016-10-05 15:36:42 +0000 UTC]

Awesome, I'm happy when I find speculative designs on my topics of interest! (though that means I either tend to abandon my idea or find something else, haha!). I do not think that the bis variant was exported to Romania, but I have always considered the possibility. With regards to camo, finding reference pictures of the historical RoAF inventory is a pain! And with that said, I think at one point I'll do an IAR 88 with the LanceR C scheme, for completeness' sake!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hellbat [2016-10-05 07:04:25 +0000 UTC]

Nice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Medjoe In reply to hellbat [2016-10-05 13:11:00 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

hellbat In reply to Medjoe [2016-10-05 18:43:14 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0