HOME | DD

MillieFan92 — Diesel 10 isn't a Ladies' Man Stamp

#stamp #diesel10 #diesel_10 #ttteshipping #thomasandfriends #thomasthetankengineandfriends
Published: 2021-12-12 13:26:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 4746; Favourites: 29; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description

It's bad enough when people ship Diesel 10 with Percy. But some people even think it's okay to ship him with different female engines. Aside from Lady, I've seen D10 get shipped with Belle, Daisy, Gina, Mavis, Molly, Ashima, Rosie and even Millie. Diesel 10 isn't the kind of character who can get shipped with many different females. The only D10 x female character ship that I find tolerable is Diesel 10 x Frankie, which I'm actually neutral towards. Though, my OTP for him is still Diesel 10 x D261.


And as I've said before, it doesn't matter whether or not TATMR is canon. What matters is how one character is portrayed in their debut. If Diesel 10 was introduced as a villain/antagonist, then he really shouldn't be paired with friendly females.


If you don't like this stamp, don't comment.

Related content
Comments: 39

BenMorse1645 [2024-10-12 20:44:19 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Stephen-Fisher [2022-12-10 17:10:03 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

ThomasFanMakerV2 [2022-05-19 22:36:50 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MillieFan92 In reply to ThomasFanMakerV2 [2022-05-19 23:16:57 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ThomasFanMakerV2 In reply to MillieFan92 [2022-05-20 20:38:34 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

ThomasFanMakerV2 [2022-05-07 19:38:10 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MillieFan92 In reply to ThomasFanMakerV2 [2022-05-07 21:06:30 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

ThomasFanMakerV2 In reply to MillieFan92 [2022-05-07 21:07:13 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MillieFan92 In reply to ThomasFanMakerV2 [2022-05-07 21:24:02 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ThomasFanMakerV2 In reply to MillieFan92 [2022-05-07 21:27:58 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MillieFan92 In reply to ThomasFanMakerV2 [2022-05-07 21:42:06 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ThomasFanMakerV2 In reply to MillieFan92 [2022-05-07 21:42:52 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MillieFan92 In reply to ThomasFanMakerV2 [2022-05-07 21:43:31 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ThomasFanMakerV2 In reply to MillieFan92 [2022-05-07 21:44:34 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

davidtjbrennan [2022-04-02 13:26:24 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

TobyandMavisforever [2022-02-26 22:05:30 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 0

picockgirl05 [2022-02-15 04:01:11 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 0

ArandomThomasFan [2022-01-30 20:13:43 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MillieFan92 In reply to ArandomThomasFan [2022-01-30 21:06:06 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArandomThomasFan In reply to MillieFan92 [2022-01-30 21:12:53 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MillieFan92 In reply to ArandomThomasFan [2022-01-30 21:15:10 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArandomThomasFan In reply to MillieFan92 [2022-01-30 21:16:52 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThomasFanMakerV2 [2022-01-05 20:25:12 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

ArandomThomasFan [2021-12-24 14:18:18 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

MillieFan92 In reply to ArandomThomasFan [2021-12-24 19:30:57 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

OctoSquid26 [2021-12-16 04:04:50 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ArthurEngine [2021-12-16 00:30:52 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Michaelfromnz1 [2021-12-12 23:56:06 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MillieFan92 In reply to Michaelfromnz1 [2021-12-12 23:59:18 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Michaelfromnz1 In reply to MillieFan92 [2021-12-12 23:59:42 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

betelplayer [2021-12-12 23:13:42 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

ArandomThomasFan [2021-12-12 15:12:58 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Thenewmikefan21 [2021-12-12 14:20:01 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MillieFan92 In reply to Thenewmikefan21 [2021-12-12 14:34:44 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JwwProd [2021-12-12 14:01:08 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MillieFan92 In reply to JwwProd [2021-12-12 14:11:28 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 2

JwwProd In reply to MillieFan92 [2022-12-10 16:28:20 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JwwProd In reply to MillieFan92 [2021-12-12 14:11:42 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

JohnTheBrainFan2022 [2021-12-12 13:44:50 +0000 UTC]

👍: 4 ⏩: 0