Comments: 80
mortalshinobi In reply to ??? [2012-12-27 07:06:30 +0000 UTC]
heh. thanks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mortalshinobi In reply to Writer4Commissions [2012-08-05 05:24:00 +0000 UTC]
thanks. this one was 100% me. loved annubis and somehow managed this from beginning to end in one day. course then i got a week long cramp in that hand. lol.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
V4VOLTAGE [2011-06-19 03:12:55 +0000 UTC]
indeed great jobs humida
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
redskullrudd [2011-06-12 22:15:27 +0000 UTC]
killer piece again - great pose, colors are really ripping it from your lab these days. Always love how you add a story.
The green in this is awesome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Pogues [2011-06-12 18:14:18 +0000 UTC]
This might be my favorite piece of yours. Really dig the colors and the pose. Great little story telling too. Really dig it and great to see a piece which really focuses on the theme character. This really shows your skills.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dreno360 [2011-06-12 02:13:46 +0000 UTC]
This is Great Humida! Real nice and different from you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LukeDenby [2011-06-11 18:47:20 +0000 UTC]
the colors really make this one pop
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zakaz92 In reply to mortalshinobi [2011-06-11 19:32:17 +0000 UTC]
Yea I see lol but dont worry ill give you a good run keep up the good work man
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CRISTIAN-SANTOS [2011-06-11 10:21:42 +0000 UTC]
your best piece to date i think.excellent job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Greatkingrat88 [2011-06-11 09:45:49 +0000 UTC]
Hmm. As I recall, Anubis was the god of the rites of mummification. The lord of the afterlife- death- would be Osiris.
I wonder also why the pharao would be protesting. He if anyone should know what is awaiting him, and that no begging could change it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
PyroFlare77 In reply to Greatkingrat88 [2011-06-12 02:41:39 +0000 UTC]
While Osiris is the god of the afterlife, he is not a god of death. He just rules over the underworld in a manner similar to Hades, but does no soul-reaping himself. Anubis, being the god that resides over mummification and judges the dead and such, makes the most sense for a god of death in Egyptian mythology, even if he doesn't explicitly kill anyone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mortalshinobi In reply to Greatkingrat88 [2011-06-11 19:07:40 +0000 UTC]
you know old men and power, they don't want to let it go. (Plus I imagine the pharaoh realizes he isn't a god, so it's a (i'm fucked) situation.)
i remembered from my old classes anubis judged your acts after death and based on the balance would let you go through or feed your soul to horace, the hippo crocodile.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Greatkingrat88 In reply to mortalshinobi [2011-06-11 20:59:30 +0000 UTC]
Well, given that the Pharaoh had the highest possible standing in the religious hierarchy (being the living embodiment of a god), he shouldn't have much cause to worry.
Horace? In egyptian mythology?
Anubis was the god of embalming, I recall, although it is possible he also acted as a judge. I don't rightly remember.
Sadly, popular fiction tends to make him evil, simply because he was associated with the underworld and has a fierce demeanour.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Greatkingrat88 In reply to mortalshinobi [2011-06-12 12:26:48 +0000 UTC]
And Loki. There's even a trope for it. [link]
Well, given that he was the pharaoh, he would still go to "heaven" or the equivalent of it, since he was the pharaoh. Unfair, but that's the mythology.
Not sure if they even have a hell as such.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mortalshinobi In reply to Greatkingrat88 [2011-06-12 17:01:30 +0000 UTC]
sigh. explaining... again...
this anubis is explaining to the pharaoh that his ideology of godhood or heaven simply for being pharaoh is false. and just like any other schmuck, he's gonna face the consequences. (In other words, this is how I believe a real anubis would work and not the made up shit the rich believe.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Greatkingrat88 In reply to mortalshinobi [2011-06-12 17:09:50 +0000 UTC]
I see.
Just FYI, this was not something just the upper classes believed. All classes firmly believed the Pharaoh was a god. His wellbeing was considered a matter of national importance by all people. It was what motivated the pyramids to be built by volunteer workers, not slaves.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mortalshinobi In reply to Greatkingrat88 [2011-06-12 17:20:57 +0000 UTC]
yeah... volunteers. I'll remember 100% of them were volunteers. eye roll.
and don't forget, the pharaohs and rulers ended controlling a lot of beliefs of people. it may have been an equal belief of status at the beginning and the pharaoh made up shit to get more status and after so many generations commoners actually believed it. but if the religion had any truth I'm sure the pharaoh being god was part of the bullshit portion. (this is something I get finnicky about.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Greatkingrat88 In reply to mortalshinobi [2011-06-12 17:42:23 +0000 UTC]
For the most part, yes.
It wasn't so much a wilful deception as a religious view. The pharohs might have been realists, or they might not have- but their status in life and death was a religious belief held by all, including the pharaoh himself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mortalshinobi In reply to Greatkingrat88 [2011-06-12 18:12:06 +0000 UTC]
uh-huh. I wonder if it was made up by him or not though?
you do recall how many pharaohs there may have been and how things can change. anyways... (this anubis is biting the pharaoh cuz he got the religion wrong! lols.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Greatkingrat88 In reply to mortalshinobi [2011-06-12 18:15:36 +0000 UTC]
You do realize that it was a tradition that lasted for more than two thousand years, right? And that no one person invented it for the sake of duping others- religion was serious business back then, in a way we can't really understand today.
I mean, there were HUNDREDS of pharaohs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mortalshinobi In reply to Greatkingrat88 [2011-06-13 01:41:43 +0000 UTC]
yep. and like the religions today i'm sure they were bastardized to serve the higher ups.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Greatkingrat88 In reply to mortalshinobi [2011-06-13 04:20:17 +0000 UTC]
No doubt it was used to pacify populations, but it was also taken very seriously even by the higher ups.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mortalshinobi In reply to Greatkingrat88 [2011-06-13 06:03:08 +0000 UTC]
heh. their self delusions. oh, i'd love to see their faces when they got to see their gods and realized how they fucked up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Greatkingrat88 In reply to mortalshinobi [2011-06-13 06:12:14 +0000 UTC]
Well, I seriously doubt there's any time to do that when you're dead.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Greatkingrat88 In reply to mortalshinobi [2011-06-13 06:19:12 +0000 UTC]
Well, since there's no tangible evidence of an afterlife...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mortalshinobi In reply to Greatkingrat88 [2011-06-13 16:22:34 +0000 UTC]
lols. and none against really. just the what is out there if anything is more the question.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Greatkingrat88 In reply to mortalshinobi [2011-06-13 17:11:48 +0000 UTC]
Well, one goes with what one can see and touch, what can be proven.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mortalshinobi In reply to Greatkingrat88 [2011-06-13 17:15:32 +0000 UTC]
one can not prove or see everything. bacteria for ex. can not be seen or touched normally even though they are there. there is no evidence contradicting the existence of a soul for example, and none for it. so how does one know if it exist or not?
anyways... you online today?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Greatkingrat88 In reply to mortalshinobi [2011-06-13 17:39:59 +0000 UTC]
Well no, not everything can be proven, far from it- that's why one has to stick to what can be proven.
In a while.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mortalshinobi In reply to Greatkingrat88 [2011-06-13 17:48:14 +0000 UTC]
all i can say to that is there are things that are proven to myself that I can not prove to you. something unshakeable that does not leave. But yes, in many respects I agree with you. Though it must be an individualistic search. Trusting in the mass for such things of such serious nature is truely folly and misleading.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Greatkingrat88 In reply to mortalshinobi [2011-06-13 18:15:28 +0000 UTC]
What is proven to you personally is not scientifically viable, though. It is valid as evidence only to you.
I feel one- and humanity as a whole- needs to base knowledge on hard evidence, and never on spiritual experiences or such bogus.
And there's no "e" in "Truly".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Greatkingrat88 In reply to mortalshinobi [2011-06-13 19:51:36 +0000 UTC]
There's no "t" in "Nazi", either.
Some truth where, in what?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>