Comments: 13
fishofury [2010-07-15 13:19:25 +0000 UTC]
cool, man
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nickillus In reply to fishofury [2010-07-16 15:25:26 +0000 UTC]
Cheers fishofury. Great name by the way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nickillus In reply to RobertLaszloKiss [2010-07-15 10:59:09 +0000 UTC]
Thanks again Lord.
Watercolour was described to me as pushing a puddle of paint round the paper. Once you introduce a slight tilt and use gravity to lay washes, that became a pretty good description of all that I did. I'd like to have been better at the freer watercolour style that allows bleeding into textured papers and such - but I could never allow myself to do that - too ocd, control freak. See - none of us is happy with our limitations.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Loath-some [2010-07-13 20:42:04 +0000 UTC]
That's impressive! Great job on this one.
Must have taken a while, how long did it take you?
Cheers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nickillus In reply to Loath-some [2010-07-15 10:55:33 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Loathsome.
Can't recall exactly - I would guess about a week, I've never been speedy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tadeos [2010-07-13 13:20:49 +0000 UTC]
great work! you really can handle watercolour!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nickillus In reply to Tadeos [2010-07-15 10:54:37 +0000 UTC]
That's kind of you Tadeos. Thanks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nickillus In reply to rasu-chi [2010-07-15 10:54:17 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Rusty - the copyright thing was added digitally of course. That space had to be kept for a title had it been used.
Watercolour is the one thing that digital still struggles somewhat to emulate. ArtRage is definitely getting closer. I still find it difficult to keep the sensitivity of the line work too. I will not let the pixel beat me though - grrr.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0