Comments: 47
BelRhaza4017 [2011-09-27 23:11:39 +0000 UTC]
kuromu said it all, great work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yeesnaw [2011-04-22 05:45:45 +0000 UTC]
[link]
I gave your credit at the end but i'm sorry for using your work without permission, i just couldn't help myself!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NightmareGK13 In reply to yeesnaw [2011-04-22 11:59:24 +0000 UTC]
i think you linked me to the wrong thing
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
monchiken [2010-11-27 16:56:42 +0000 UTC]
Wow, there are many nice bows xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sunvera [2010-11-01 23:07:18 +0000 UTC]
These look great! I don't really get how to hold numbers 4, 7, and 8 though, since there's no full grip, but I'm in awe at all the thought that must have been put into these. I'm an archer myself. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sunvera In reply to NightmareGK13 [2010-11-10 02:37:55 +0000 UTC]
A hand guard makes more sense. 8D
Hmm, how to explain? By 'full grip', I meant that someone could wrap their hand around the handle. So if the guards aren't impeding that then it looks like one awesome design!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DavidSequeira [2010-09-13 13:50:12 +0000 UTC]
nice job duda!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HallowGazer [2010-09-10 17:02:33 +0000 UTC]
Again, some really neat ideas, especially incorporating an axe/blade on the bow and using a second string.
I'm not into practical archery at all, so I can't really tell, but I imagine it more difficult to shoot with a second string, though...
As for the black/white, I'm not exactly sure, really...
but I'd say that some details like small black lines might get lost easier if the weapons are colored too dark.
Both ways are cool with me, but it might look better to have white weapons (with some grey tones)on darker ground.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Inai10 [2010-09-10 13:33:00 +0000 UTC]
These are very nice looking ^^ Makes me wanna model 'em. The concept seems clear to me the way you have 'em btw.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Inai10 In reply to NightmareGK13 [2010-09-22 18:47:53 +0000 UTC]
I guess it would be the front from an archer's perspective, but you knew what I meant xD And yep they shouldn't be problematic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The90sDoggo [2010-09-10 05:31:44 +0000 UTC]
cool weapon
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tenchuu17 [2010-09-10 00:36:13 +0000 UTC]
I have actually used a double strung bow when I use to take classes in archery. So much fun.
Interesting concept nonetheless. Though the reasons stated for the additional string seem superfluous and cosmetic(ie. ornamental or superficial). But then most things are. I like practicality but if everything was just don't for the sake of practicality the world would be much more boring.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tenchuu17 In reply to NightmareGK13 [2010-09-10 20:10:28 +0000 UTC]
The reason I say superfluous is for your reasons you stated. Its in case if one breaks. The problem with that is that they are not in the same location which is actually to be expected since putting both would mess with the nock(?) I say superfluous because he could very well have some strings in some pouch or compartment in his clothing. Even as an archer you carry around a knife for close combat or to skin animals pelts off to cook.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NightmareGK13 In reply to Tenchuu17 [2010-09-10 23:21:38 +0000 UTC]
warrior archer not hunter
they don't mess with each other, you pull back on the bigger one first
changing string during battle takes time, thats why during the american civil war they had the bayonets same thing with the French, they only had one shot
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tenchuu17 In reply to NightmareGK13 [2010-09-10 23:46:54 +0000 UTC]
Yes, Bayonets where for close range combat, it was just more practical.
I am guessing by hunter you mean someone who carries a dog or some type of pet to keep the other thing busy. Otherwise they have to do the move and shoot method, perhaps get on top of a tree and shot from there. Stuff of that nature.
One important fact left forgotten was that during the civil war they abided by some foolish sense of honor. They would shoot, get on their knees and the flank behind them would shoot and so one until they keep switching from one row to the next, then a third and back to the first.
Battles became trivial and repetitive at that point.
And if by warrior archer you mean a person who solely uses a bow and arrow to fight then they are generally a supplementary force. They go behind the main force and cause confusion and panic. You could say the do "crowd control" while the knights rush headfirst into the conflict. Generally Archers came in large groups as a single archer is very limited at what he is capable of. And it is easy to exploit the time between attacks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ThugraKhotan [2010-09-09 22:18:22 +0000 UTC]
hey the last one on top is it a compound?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThugraKhotan In reply to NightmareGK13 [2010-09-09 22:52:14 +0000 UTC]
its double stringed I come for a place where many bow hunt
the compound bow has double string on it its easier if you look it up on google
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NightmareGK13 In reply to ThugraKhotan [2010-09-09 23:18:30 +0000 UTC]
ah damn someone thought of it already,
not the principle i think isn't the same
these are all fantasy bows nothing real to them, the double string is just because i though of what would happen is a string ripped during battle, the warrior would be defenseless
so i added an extra one for the two purposes i mentioned above
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThugraKhotan In reply to NightmareGK13 [2010-09-10 02:42:04 +0000 UTC]
well then that is new a compound bow is still one string just longer and put around pullies
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThugraKhotan In reply to NightmareGK13 [2010-09-10 19:23:06 +0000 UTC]
sounds dumb works well I think it would be funny to see that tech in a fantasy weapon
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kuromu [2010-09-09 22:11:19 +0000 UTC]
Some of these look ultimately kick ass.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1