Comments: 47
Peimi [2018-05-15 20:07:49 +0000 UTC]
Really spooky
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NovemberART In reply to Peimi [2018-06-14 06:47:44 +0000 UTC]
Brutal architecture, always is! Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Freckles4815162342 [2011-08-25 18:56:07 +0000 UTC]
I love how it turned out! Looks like film
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NovemberART In reply to skylovekiss [2010-01-31 02:26:15 +0000 UTC]
Multumesc, e facuta in Craiova cu un Kodak mai vechi.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
votre-maman [2008-06-19 14:17:01 +0000 UTC]
wo. trippy. awesome. cool. sah-weet!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kur [2007-12-21 10:29:55 +0000 UTC]
flares look coo
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cottonGIRL [2007-10-15 06:01:44 +0000 UTC]
OMG like this sooo much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
whothennow24 [2007-09-06 16:12:11 +0000 UTC]
This is just beautiful....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zuggy [2007-08-30 19:49:30 +0000 UTC]
WOWWWWWWWWWWW
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JanelleUtheim [2007-08-29 16:14:03 +0000 UTC]
I got a free Kodak Trimprint 920 with a recent purchase of another camera... Do you know what film you can use with these cameras?
The picture is absolutely gorgeous.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ungeheuer [2007-08-28 22:55:04 +0000 UTC]
Why "Kodak"?
Nice one!
Is it time zero/sx-70 film?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NovemberART In reply to Ungeheuer [2007-08-29 06:56:34 +0000 UTC]
Kodak, because it's like a Kodak Polaroid. Not a SX-70 film.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ungeheuer In reply to NovemberART [2007-08-29 09:41:28 +0000 UTC]
okay. just wondered because kodak produced instant films very long ago.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gudubara [2007-08-26 22:58:48 +0000 UTC]
It makes me feel uneasy. And that is a compliment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1