Comments: 20
tassietyger [2011-12-07 04:42:57 +0000 UTC]
While probably not as elobrate as G. wucaii, P. bradleyi had more likely a crest of some sort. I am having trouble seeing the "horn".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to tassietyger [2011-12-07 18:26:21 +0000 UTC]
Possibly, yes... (I wouldn't say "more likely" in the absence of fossil evidence) Why not hypothesize more diversity amongst the early tyrannosauroids?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NTamura In reply to Ryivhnn [2011-12-08 23:42:25 +0000 UTC]
No, I am not rigging then... I have actually no idea that we can do this (I am such a newbie) LOL!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Krajax [2011-11-28 21:15:27 +0000 UTC]
Pretty interesting...I didn't think this simple creature would evolve into something badass like T. rex lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to Krajax [2011-11-28 21:55:30 +0000 UTC]
Just like any animal, T-rex had a modest start...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Krajax In reply to NTamura [2011-11-29 23:28:53 +0000 UTC]
True to that
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Zimices [2011-11-28 20:24:46 +0000 UTC]
Nice, I've seen few Proceratosaurus. So, the "horn" of Proceratosaurus only extends in the anterior portion of the snout?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to Zimices [2011-11-28 21:52:08 +0000 UTC]
We don't know for sure... If you look at the fossil, the upper part of the skull is missing:
[link]
Some have speculated that the "horn" is part of a nasal crest like in Guanlong but that is just speculation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gallardoblend [2011-11-28 04:08:21 +0000 UTC]
The pose of its body looks kind of awkward to me, the feet look too close together and the arms seem really stiff. Then again, I wouldn't know how this creature is supposed to stand or look lol.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0