Comments: 41
AddictChan [2009-03-07 15:42:55 +0000 UTC]
your art featured here: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zanroth [2008-11-06 22:42:51 +0000 UTC]
I especially enjoyed your color choices on this work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kyuketsuki45 [2008-10-10 17:16:58 +0000 UTC]
Any mistake you had to work in turned out beautiful. 👍: 0 ⏩: 1
snapelupinlvr [2008-09-14 01:56:41 +0000 UTC]
Looks great, I love how the pieces are broken up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
msklystron [2008-09-12 06:45:07 +0000 UTC]
The art deco like curves (reflecting the heart) made me think of the home -- a pitcher, a plate a bowl. The four 'chambers' of the heart became the four sections of the picture and perhaps four rooms of a house. Anyway that was my first impression. Home is where the heart is. The mix of feelings evoked in the piece kept me looking around and around at it.
This is just very pretty, because of the colours, curving lines, implied volumes, ambiguous space and hints of highlights (whites).
Good luck with the contest.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
msklystron In reply to Oleem [2008-09-15 03:50:56 +0000 UTC]
Art Deco can be easy to spot. It was a design movement that became most popular in the 1920s. It incorporated a mishmash of past and present styles with an emphasis on arcing lines and angles.... Art Nouveau, which is Klimt and Mucha's style was among the mishmash of Art Deco styles.
Having a general idea and seeing where it takes you often leaves things up to the viewer. These are often my favourite paintings to view, because they make me dredge up memories or make connections.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Child-of-Mithra [2008-09-08 02:48:13 +0000 UTC]
This is a talent that I wish I shared with you. You are truly blessed. The color palette is probably (for me anyway) just as expressive as the art itself. People doodle hearts all day, but this makes the heart nearly invincible through art.
Also noteworthy is your comment. It is not only thorough and interesting it is thought provoking and philosophical.
Thank you.
Peace.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oleem In reply to Kuthinks [2008-09-07 14:34:18 +0000 UTC]
Yeah I'm a bit stupid sometimes ;D thanks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
b1gfan [2008-09-06 19:29:59 +0000 UTC]
I really really like it! The tones and the internal geometry are very inviting to the eye.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oleem In reply to b1gfan [2008-09-07 01:17:51 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! Glad you noticed that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oleem In reply to versarnwen [2008-09-12 19:13:01 +0000 UTC]
Yes. Backgrounds suck. If I drew on thicker paper I'd probably just use tempera, way faster and easier and it usually looks better! The downside of cardboard is that you can't really erase it so you better know what you're doing and be good at it! With abstracts it doesn't make a huge difference but I've done portraits on cardboard too...it was an interesting experience. I guess that it does have its benefits too, when I can erase as much as I want I go all psycho perfectionist and never accomplish anything.
Oh dear. Sketchbook paper is just a pain in general, but I know exactly what you mean.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
morror In reply to Oleem [2008-09-06 22:17:01 +0000 UTC]
Ah! That will be easy for you ;D
👍: 0 ⏩: 0