HOME | DD

Olorotitan β€” Balaur bondoc WIP

Published: 2010-09-04 12:29:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 11261; Favourites: 277; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Initial sketch
Related content
Comments: 27

Jeda45 [2014-03-30 22:51:42 +0000 UTC]

The head looks kind of "jeholornithiform"-like, which is really quite prophetic considering its phylogenetic position in the Aurornis paper. Since Cau's megamatrix is much more in-depth than any published TWG analyses, I would consider its position as a "jeholornithiform" at least as well-supported as its position as a eudromaeosaur.

This probably looks more like my idea of Balaur than anything else I've seen, although I imagine its wings being somewhat smaller. I'd say that this is, without a doubt, the best Balaur reconstruction I've ever seen, and that's not only because it agrees with my choice of hypotheses.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Olorotitan In reply to Jeda45 [2014-04-02 15:06:59 +0000 UTC]

Do you think that I should finish the artwork in color?Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jeda45 In reply to Olorotitan [2014-04-03 03:43:23 +0000 UTC]

That would certainly be cool to see.

I did my own reconstruction of Balaur a few months ago, and I was struck when I first saw this picture how similar it looked to what I was aiming for with my drawing, especially because you did it long before the suggestion it was an avialan.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Fragillimus335 [2013-10-01 03:18:46 +0000 UTC]

Will this be finished??? :0

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Olorotitan In reply to Fragillimus335 [2013-10-02 17:45:59 +0000 UTC]

maybe

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fragillimus335 In reply to Olorotitan [2013-10-02 19:51:33 +0000 UTC]

PLEASE! Β There aren't any truly great Balaur pics done yet...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ladymedusa218 [2012-12-27 22:49:17 +0000 UTC]

Are the theories of balaur being a herbivore still the main acception or has that changed?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Olorotitan In reply to Ladymedusa218 [2012-12-28 17:18:14 +0000 UTC]

i don't know about theories. There is some hypothesis.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ladymedusa218 [2012-12-27 22:42:50 +0000 UTC]

For being a lil killer it sure is cute!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ariel-orea [2012-07-04 05:07:41 +0000 UTC]

nice

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

wildartguy [2012-06-29 04:44:24 +0000 UTC]

Oooh! I like where this is going! Looks like a real animal.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pashiino [2012-06-05 19:09:40 +0000 UTC]

so cute

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Random-Gal [2012-06-05 16:06:39 +0000 UTC]

So.... CUTE.

Not to mention the fantastically detailed line work and gorgeous shading!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

R-P-Porter [2012-06-05 07:48:17 +0000 UTC]

cute!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Axawatta3 [2011-06-03 08:37:41 +0000 UTC]

it look cute

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Trodonto [2011-01-16 14:28:20 +0000 UTC]

beautiful reconstruction of this amazing dinosaur. very good job!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

pilsator [2010-09-22 02:24:08 +0000 UTC]

Very nice and intuitively realistic. Maybe the best Balaur I've seen so far

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

chuckingsquid [2010-09-14 23:22:21 +0000 UTC]

It was actually very likely a herbivore.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Olorotitan In reply to chuckingsquid [2010-09-15 05:25:03 +0000 UTC]

Maybe. Maybe an omnivore.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

chuckingsquid In reply to Olorotitan [2010-09-15 07:29:09 +0000 UTC]

If you want to see evidence supporting this, go here: [link]

It is now agreed among scientists it was in fact a herbivore.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Hyrotrioskjan [2010-09-12 13:40:27 +0000 UTC]

A beautiful predator.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nemo-ramjet [2010-09-05 13:47:21 +0000 UTC]

I love this...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

chasmosaur [2010-09-04 17:32:29 +0000 UTC]

Best one yet. No ridiculous hyperextensible hallux, yay.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Dinomaniac [2010-09-04 16:07:55 +0000 UTC]

best Balaur I have yet seen!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DinoHunter000 [2010-09-04 15:03:52 +0000 UTC]

Its done. You're definitely in the runnings for one of my fav paleoartists!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

maryolein [2010-09-04 14:11:27 +0000 UTC]

Haha, really nice work <3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Darthsantuzzo [2010-09-04 12:35:16 +0000 UTC]

Just... wow!
Finally a serious reconstruction of this dinosaur!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0