HOME | DD

p4freesausage party

Published: 2004-04-08 01:39:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 4311; Favourites: 68; Downloads: 1640
Redirect to original
Description Mixed Media on Canvas.
36x36"
Related content
Comments: 66

easyfloat [2004-10-12 16:36:24 +0000 UTC]

realy like when i see how someone combines paint-draw stile , , realy great composition u achived with blue as dominant in composition , and raw thin lines around it

restekpa!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

True-aleth [2004-05-13 17:16:54 +0000 UTC]

really good

great work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

maura [2004-04-15 01:30:34 +0000 UTC]

It's got that those light pinky and bluey tones, then the black--it's got that feel of false contentment, like there's something sinister going on in the backgound, that we can only see part of. Then the title, and the text. I googled "totaley", and found page after page of porn sites. I don't know if that was the point, or a coincidence. Beautifully rendered painting, too bad I'm viewing it from a little box.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

p4free In reply to maura [2004-04-15 13:39:56 +0000 UTC]

i just wanted to spell totally like a surfer dude. that is an awesome and hilarious porn coincidence. thanks for all the words by the way

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kittiquin [2004-04-13 14:17:56 +0000 UTC]

odd.

awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

paradegritar [2004-04-13 03:54:21 +0000 UTC]

weird
i like it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

urbanparadox [2004-04-13 03:48:11 +0000 UTC]

i agree with rettic. its about time something good is in the daily. true art. i truly belive.

this gives me inspiration too. the typography is awesome and just the fact that i have a hard time figuring what it means and what its suppose to be make me love it even more. i like to think

thanx for the inspiration and please keep it up. this is what we need more on da.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

p4free In reply to urbanparadox [2004-04-13 17:10:27 +0000 UTC]

thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

vermillionbird [2004-04-13 03:17:04 +0000 UTC]

quite exquisite in its formal delicacy;
the political content is appropriately
accompanied by the contrasts between
subtle shading and markedly marked
lines.

I only wish I could see it at scale,
the vagaries of digitality send me
the message that this is about
12" square. I can only image how much
more immediately effective it would
be at original size.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

vermillionbird In reply to vermillionbird [2004-04-13 14:42:36 +0000 UTC]

I meant affective rather than effective.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JourneyOfNe [2004-04-13 02:09:16 +0000 UTC]

Wow, you've capture every crappy party i've ever gone to in such beauty... totaley

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Age-Solo [2004-04-13 00:49:05 +0000 UTC]

This art piece is quite intriguing. It definitely has a mix of several different ideas and an almost unsure feeling to it. I'm undecided about whether or not i like the actual art style but i can see where you're coming from with the theme and subject matter etc. But either way, to me it seems like a.. complex yet serene environment. Very cool. Hey y'know its funny because when i see the "i don't get it" comments it sort of reminds me about how my girlfriend patronises art. But yeah, if you think about it, art doesn't really have a definitive definition to it, there are sooo many facets to it, so yeah the narrow minded will never fully comprehend what it means to create true art.

- Awsome Effort, and i congratulate you for not taking any of the crap that these people have given you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

p4free In reply to Age-Solo [2004-04-13 01:45:49 +0000 UTC]

thanks man

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xxz [2004-04-12 23:31:30 +0000 UTC]

you get dizzy if you look at it long enough

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thevelvetspleen [2004-04-12 23:11:59 +0000 UTC]

congratulations on the daily deviation. i've had it before too so now we have something in common. i saw this tiny thumb nail and i knew it was yours automatically. i really like your work why would someone say they don't get it? art doesn't have to be understood. that's so stupid. good good work. i love it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

p4free In reply to thevelvetspleen [2004-04-13 01:49:41 +0000 UTC]

thanks for the support. love mathew barney, me.[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thevelvetspleen In reply to p4free [2004-04-13 14:25:52 +0000 UTC]

hahahahaah. what if you were matthew barney? that would be hilarious.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

p4free In reply to thevelvetspleen [2004-04-13 15:10:27 +0000 UTC]

matthew barney cant paint. I meant to say: I love matthew barney.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AtomicGhostStudios [2004-04-12 23:05:20 +0000 UTC]

Wow, there's a lot wrong with you. Love the art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lilspritebubbles [2004-04-12 22:36:42 +0000 UTC]

gar... when people say "i dont get it" ..... bah!!

at least look at it for a good while, with an open mind, and come up with your own story.


i like the orange semi-target-like-circles. they look like vibration rings.
on the right, i see a black leg and foot with white ballet flats wearing white boxers. which are large.
standing in front of what looks to me like boxing or wrestling ring ropes. but they are delicate, maybe even gentle.
and in front of that, is a curved rosy-lipped smile.
on the left i see a road/champaigne glass.
the center looks to me like a piano, with a mountain peak on top. and a flag on it's tip.

perhaps, after a formal ball, all the guests drove away, and a couple hastily cleaned up their party, drank some bubbly, and had sex - with a conquered peak of excitement - on top of the grand piano. they had a gentle, teasing argument, she walked away wearing his boxers and black hose, after flashing a pink lipstick grin.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

p4free In reply to lilspritebubbles [2004-04-13 01:53:09 +0000 UTC]

you are a genius!!!!!!! thanks for looking.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

methidox [2004-04-12 22:26:26 +0000 UTC]

In my opinion this has no taste. Post post-modernism? ya right, where is the additude... there is no real skillfull style expressed here. You have a colorfull, yet brown and boring, blotch over some creative sketchy pastel work.

You've started things and pulled them apart, dwelled on their detail and pushed them together. There is no real expression in my opinion, just incomplete ideas due to lack of skill or misconcepted and/or lost expression.

I'm sure this got DA for the detail. Nevertheless it is dull, poorly studied, 7th grade special student artwork. My suggestions are to organize your thoughts more clearly, mix them into a plot to be expressed in your "abstract" art.

I see here that the line which seperates idealism and super realistic expression and what is actually blotched together randomness has been clearly missed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

p4free In reply to methidox [2004-04-13 02:02:09 +0000 UTC]

i am a 7th grade special student, mr smartypants

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

methidox In reply to p4free [2004-04-19 05:46:59 +0000 UTC]

whatever, maybe i'm jelous becuase i cant see anything and you can...

Actually i am, and feel lucky i told you that or not.. it would be selfish of me to expect you to feel lucky for someone else's words of which you have no respect for (which is rightfully so)...

anywho, if its what you like and your good at it, keep it up i guess...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lilspritebubbles In reply to methidox [2004-04-12 23:02:32 +0000 UTC]

way to be completely rude.


but then again, at least you gave a detailed critique, filled with completely valid reasons. people who say "wow, this sucks" are immediately ignored.

however, though i can see where your reasons could apply, and how they do somewhat in the slightest for me..... i have to say that even these reasons are why i like the picture.


but im glad you gave another (though negative... ...) side.

but with being so heavily critical and negative, you shouldnt be surprised if somone commented on your sucky poetry, beyond-cliche eye submissions, and intensely amateur slapped-together art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

lilspritebubbles In reply to lilspritebubbles [2004-04-19 13:29:38 +0000 UTC]

haha, well darling, this isnt my art.
i was just commenting on your comment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

methidox In reply to lilspritebubbles [2004-04-19 05:41:32 +0000 UTC]

i'm not suprised and i know my poetry is cliche and only good in the eyes of someone who doesnt know what poetry is... thats why i think its good. And i am only so critical on your piece becuase it is favored so much, but yet so lightly in ways like "That rules!" kind of ways...

Although i do see why it is good in the perspective eyes of people who like that kind of thing becuase its the way it is... in my opinion it is dis-tastiful towards good art, or good abstract art... which is one of my favored types of art.

I just critique in this way in hopes that your future art has cleaner lines and is organized becuase i think that would help! but, i do know that is something which your probably NOT going for... your goals as an artist are different than mine... but hey! at least i'm not an absorbing glum that has an opinion not entirely my own I'm a pure individual, and although other people may not want to be that way, i love it! hehe... anyways, sorry for being rude... i was having a bad day lol (although i take none of my words back, to say the least for my individuality) all else i can say is, get over it if it doesnt matter to you! and i'm sure you already have :-D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mrslobsterhands [2004-04-12 22:01:12 +0000 UTC]

ah.. I don't get it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mrslobsterhands [2004-04-12 22:01:12 +0000 UTC]

ah.. I don't get it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mrslobsterhands [2004-04-12 22:01:09 +0000 UTC]

ah.. I don't get it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

azltron [2004-04-12 21:29:01 +0000 UTC]

wow...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gyroscope [2004-04-12 21:26:30 +0000 UTC]

crabtastic.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ParanoidMonkey [2004-04-12 20:51:25 +0000 UTC]

I don't even know why but "totaley" love this...
btw.... is this my underwear showing in the right corner?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

p4free In reply to ParanoidMonkey [2004-04-12 21:14:00 +0000 UTC]

thank you and yes, it is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

digitalNRG [2004-04-12 19:45:11 +0000 UTC]

am i stupid.. cause i don't like this opium art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

eukaryotik [2004-04-12 19:35:35 +0000 UTC]

too cool for school

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NotKaizokuJesus69420 [2004-04-12 19:29:50 +0000 UTC]

THIS ISNT EVEN ANYTHING, EVERYONE WHO LIKES ART IS A MORON

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lord-Zukin In reply to NotKaizokuJesus69420 [2004-04-12 21:12:44 +0000 UTC]

Anyone who doesn't have the intellect to disengage their caps lock when speaking, neglects proper punctuation, and cannot draw to save their lives, has no place in critiqueing fine art. And compared to your work, this is a definate Van Gough. Hypocrite.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NotKaizokuJesus69420 In reply to Lord-Zukin [2004-04-12 22:51:24 +0000 UTC]

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lord-Zukin In reply to NotKaizokuJesus69420 [2004-04-12 23:29:41 +0000 UTC]

... Exactly my point.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NotKaizokuJesus69420 In reply to Lord-Zukin [2004-04-12 23:31:50 +0000 UTC]

R U KONECTED TO THE WEB

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jes-the-dragonfox [2004-04-12 17:31:40 +0000 UTC]

SAAAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUUSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEE PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YY
:3 awesome work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

arterie [2004-04-12 17:10:05 +0000 UTC]

yes, very nice!... going off to your gallery now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

yuria [2004-04-12 16:54:28 +0000 UTC]

Very intriquing. Makes me wanna know what this is although I know that probably this isn't anything (that's how it goes with abstract paintings)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

p4free In reply to yuria [2004-04-12 17:58:01 +0000 UTC]

its a bunch of weenies discussing politics.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

yuria In reply to p4free [2004-04-13 10:47:41 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I thought so

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rettic [2004-04-12 16:20:25 +0000 UTC]

It's about time something good gets featured.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sp-az [2004-04-12 15:18:40 +0000 UTC]

i'm in love with this :

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MoonLightDragon [2004-04-12 14:46:27 +0000 UTC]

uhh...


Good colour choices though

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

crapforge [2004-04-12 14:42:12 +0000 UTC]

hmm..
i don't get it..
but nevertheless it looks interesting

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>