Comments: 19
glovannas [2016-04-17 22:07:42 +0000 UTC]
thank you
π: 0 β©: 0
SickPuppyi [2016-02-10 13:03:45 +0000 UTC]
why do people feel the need to see their faces on a small creature when there are already so many
i'll probably sound like an idiot but not everyone should be allowed to breed tbh
π: 0 β©: 0
brihanna25 [2015-08-01 21:07:48 +0000 UTC]
I am so confused........
π: 0 β©: 1
paramoreSUCKS In reply to brihanna25 [2015-12-22 17:20:41 +0000 UTC]
it basically means get more abortions or learn about contraceptivesΒ
π: 0 β©: 0
GlassBottleDemon [2014-01-16 16:10:26 +0000 UTC]
I think you should be more clear that its referring to putting kids up for adoption and not the actual act of adopting a child itself.
π: 1 β©: 0
HeiMantaHei [2013-11-13 10:05:43 +0000 UTC]
Now that I think of it.. It's not pro-adoption, it's pro-give the baby away after it's born. Because That's what it means. They won't necessarily be adopted.
I'm not for rejecting the born baby, if abortion would have been possible.
π: 0 β©: 0
dinosapien [2013-08-26 13:06:52 +0000 UTC]
Who the fuck would be against adoption?
π: 0 β©: 1
eggs4lyf In reply to dinosapien [2014-08-07 20:05:14 +0000 UTC]
its a request
π: 0 β©: 0
AClockworkKitten [2013-03-13 16:04:28 +0000 UTC]
I know it's a request but, just what?
π: 0 β©: 1
ExoticJackal In reply to AClockworkKitten [2013-07-04 16:35:27 +0000 UTC]
Too many people say "NO ABORTION DO ADOPTION!!!" I assume that is what this is directed to.
π: 0 β©: 1
AClockworkKitten In reply to ExoticJackal [2013-07-04 17:25:50 +0000 UTC]
While I'd choose adoption over abortion, it's too bad the adoption system is a piece of crap.
π: 0 β©: 1
CandyReaper-Malloko [2013-02-21 00:35:21 +0000 UTC]
Why doesn't anyone adopt some kids instead of adding more into orphanages.
π: 0 β©: 0
xghfthfgxn [2013-02-19 09:02:51 +0000 UTC]
The sad thing is that no-one's adopting nowadays.
π: 0 β©: 0
kari10101 [2013-02-19 07:36:38 +0000 UTC]
I have this sort of odd feeling that a comma would be better after adoption.
π: 0 β©: 0
MercuryShine [2013-02-19 03:46:53 +0000 UTC]
Can you explain your position or this stamp a bit more? It sounds like it's contradicting itself.
π: 0 β©: 1
MercuryShine In reply to paramoreSUCKS [2013-02-19 05:05:55 +0000 UTC]
Oh, stupid me. Didn't even read the title. >>
π: 0 β©: 0