Comments: 54
JD20mg [2023-05-26 11:43:05 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
p3rsh1ng [2022-01-16 09:05:42 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wraithsith [2021-06-01 19:09:42 +0000 UTC]
Have you ever worked on u-boats/submarines?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wraithsith In reply to PenUser [2021-06-01 23:33:33 +0000 UTC]
Your interest in WWI reminds me alot of Trenchpunk1914 , lately I’ve had intense interest regarding WWI fantasy- but I’ve yet to see things like fantastical U-Boats, or fantastical Armoured trains, or any real attention paid to the eastern or balkan fronts, or naval warfare not regarding Dreadnoughts.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wraithsith In reply to PenUser [2021-06-10 03:46:58 +0000 UTC]
Like those one-man submarines the Italians used in WWII? Where i think they’d manually guide a torpedo in shallow waters before scuba diving away.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
yaypowers [2020-10-26 23:17:59 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
manchild70 [2019-09-03 07:10:13 +0000 UTC]
Brilaint
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zielinskijoseph [2019-05-29 23:03:43 +0000 UTC]
Medium tank fortress.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ArtJournal77 [2017-06-07 08:33:24 +0000 UTC]
youre a crazy engineer and thats a good thing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sandnic In reply to ArtJournal77 [2017-10-22 02:31:22 +0000 UTC]
Why that many machine guns?
Why three machine guns followed by a cannon?
Why?
I dont care i love it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RRaillery [2016-11-25 15:10:36 +0000 UTC]
I'm always in awe of the technical thought put into your mechanical creations. This looks every inch the infantry regiment stopper your backstory describes it to be.
My favorite part has to be the inclusion, in the midst of this wildly-excessive concentration of small-caliber firepower, of the engineer's own little firing port to squeeze off a few rounds with his sidearm.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheoComm [2016-11-24 18:45:22 +0000 UTC]
Lovely tank, surprised you gave the commander a dedicated job rather than making him the gunner considering the time period this tank would have operated in
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dgs-Krieger [2016-11-21 18:49:50 +0000 UTC]
What a chunky piece of rolling scrap
I love it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ArthurMarkus [2016-11-21 18:33:41 +0000 UTC]
Armor thin as paper.
Easy target for heavy rifle.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gallienus53 [2016-11-21 16:55:04 +0000 UTC]
Very nice, definitely looks like an improvement over the Mark I - Mark V tanks. Presumably it's fast as it looks a little delicate: even for WW-I use. I would prefer not to serve in one as I'm allergic to the exposed gas/ diesel fuel tanks mounted on the back. Also looks a little stuffy in hot weather? I bet interior temperatures could reach 140F. Having well endowed scantily clad female service members might be a necessary adjunct in this case? Maybe you could have an alternative (R-rated) version? Still quite an interesting exposed view.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zgerken [2016-11-21 10:41:28 +0000 UTC]
Amazing, imagine if that existed it be a real menace on the battlefield!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zgerken In reply to PenUser [2016-11-21 16:44:48 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I agree with you, it be effective against forces where there a few anti tank weapons about.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jailgurdnegative [2016-11-21 02:30:21 +0000 UTC]
that thing's a beast. Is that 3 MGs beside the canon on the top turret?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jailgurdnegative In reply to PenUser [2016-11-22 04:10:32 +0000 UTC]
that's awesome. Frontal firepower ftw!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FelixSandcat [2016-11-21 02:09:34 +0000 UTC]
it remind me about WW1 tank
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ares12 [2016-11-21 01:45:24 +0000 UTC]
Major claustrophobia I'd bet.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TRUEvector [2016-11-20 21:51:17 +0000 UTC]
It's so good, just so god damn good, I can't find my words to describe... What an awesome amount of work you do for fun, unbelieveable.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
salyssong [2016-11-20 21:41:29 +0000 UTC]
They se us rollin' they hatin' they tryn' catch us ridin' dirty.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vincent-Wullf [2016-11-20 20:35:31 +0000 UTC]
looks sweet but I'd feel uncomfortable with the ammo stored right there in the turret
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vincent-Wullf In reply to PenUser [2016-11-20 21:37:19 +0000 UTC]
Makes sense.
and no problem
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Michael-von-Terra [2016-11-20 20:28:31 +0000 UTC]
Awesome work! I would like to see how it looks without cutting
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PenUser In reply to Michael-von-Terra [2016-11-20 21:14:33 +0000 UTC]
True, it requires a bit of imagination but you get some clues to how the outside looks when you look at the portions which are not cut on the front and on the side indicating the general shape of it. Maybe I should've included a small pic with the tank as a whole...
Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>