Comments: 26
Antonek7 [2022-08-15 13:27:18 +0000 UTC]
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
CartoonBen [2017-09-12 03:17:41 +0000 UTC]
How cute. Did you use beaver fur or capybara fur to photo-manipulate that Wadiasaurus?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CartoonBen In reply to PhilipEdwin [2017-09-14 14:05:17 +0000 UTC]
I had a feeling it was some other kind of mammal, but I didn't even think about muskrats. But thanks for refreshing my memory about them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AntFingers [2016-05-21 09:16:41 +0000 UTC]
Very nice manipulation here!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vasix [2014-11-09 03:00:37 +0000 UTC]
The fact that it's terrier-sized makes it more adorable. I love these furry basal synapsids, to be honest...ever done a furry anteosaur or another dinocephalian though? Do you think they had hair and fleshy noses as well?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PhilipEdwin In reply to vasix [2014-11-10 19:30:32 +0000 UTC]
An anteosaur isn't a bad idea
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vasix In reply to PhilipEdwin [2014-11-11 00:02:04 +0000 UTC]
for one, I truly do get tired of seeing leathery-skinned anteosaurs, and if something as primitive among synapsid ranks as a pelycosaur can be furred....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PhilipEdwin In reply to vasix [2014-11-12 18:16:16 +0000 UTC]
Early theraspids with non-glandular scaly skin or sauropsid-like osteoderms is my pet peeve. Scutes or xenarthran-like osteoderms are fine, but they should never, ever, ever, look lizardy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheMorlock [2014-10-17 23:35:10 +0000 UTC]
Did they really have fur?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
PhilipEdwin In reply to TheMorlock [2014-10-18 08:43:31 +0000 UTC]
We don't actually know.
Fur's not an exclusively modern mammal trait. It's cropped up numerous times in the crustaceans, insects, pterosaurs, etcetera. There's even some speculation that early Sphenacodonts had at least some fur, in addition to scutes.
Of course it's all wild speculation until some skin prints are actually found.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
QueenSerenity2012 In reply to TheMorlock [2014-10-18 01:48:26 +0000 UTC]
I don't think we have any skin impressions from them, but I think it's reasonable to think they might've.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheMorlock In reply to QueenSerenity2012 [2014-10-18 05:08:40 +0000 UTC]
Okay. I've been wondering lately how far back fur goes in synapsid evolution.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
QueenSerenity2012 In reply to TheMorlock [2014-10-18 12:53:29 +0000 UTC]
I'm pretty sure we have some skin impressions from Estemmenosuchus, and it shows bare skins with signs of glands being present too. I personally think it had hair in some form, and it just didn't preserve.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wesdaaman [2014-10-16 21:10:07 +0000 UTC]
A bit too much fur there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PhilipEdwin In reply to Wesdaaman [2014-10-16 21:24:17 +0000 UTC]
How much would be too much? We don't really know what the pelage of the dicynodonts was like.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Orionide5 In reply to PhilipEdwin [2014-10-16 23:33:17 +0000 UTC]
I think it's perfect! I love the thought of this adorable creature taking a bath.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wesdaaman In reply to PhilipEdwin [2014-10-16 21:27:13 +0000 UTC]
I picture them having only a small amount.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0