Comments: 128
binaural4562 [2010-07-12 12:49:52 +0000 UTC]
beautiful colors and concept!
π: 0 β©: 0
CrazyBeautiful0116 [2010-03-26 05:38:51 +0000 UTC]
the color is amazing! great shot~!
π: 0 β©: 1
Thinking-Silence [2010-02-18 18:15:27 +0000 UTC]
Hammer Foto!
Ich wΓΌrd dir aber empfehlen fΓΌr den Mond ne extra Belichtung anzufertigen, Iso hΓΆher und dann mit grΓΆΓerer Blende den Mond scharf ablichten.
Greets
Jan
π: 0 β©: 1
PictureElement In reply to Thinking-Silence [2010-02-23 14:34:12 +0000 UTC]
Ja hΓ€tte man machen kΓΆnnen, aber ich fand es schΓΆn so und am natΓΌrlichsten!
Ich war so beschΓ€ftigt mit dem Rest da hab ich an sowas auch garnicht gedacht ^^
π: 0 β©: 1
Artemis-Nightmare [2010-02-10 02:17:37 +0000 UTC]
amazing! the red lighting, combined with the moon in a still bright sky brings to mind an alien planet...maybe mars or something...too cool!
π: 0 β©: 1
Niraad-S [2010-01-30 00:27:20 +0000 UTC]
Unbelievable! what a shot!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Jacob-Routzahn [2010-01-15 05:34:26 +0000 UTC]
Gorgeous coloration in this shot. Those reds and blues are just spectacular. Plus I love how you left the shutter open long enough for a long exposure, but not to the point you lose all of the details in the waves. If you don't mind me asking, what shutter speed did you use?
π: 0 β©: 1
cyclopsmine [2009-10-22 06:25:16 +0000 UTC]
wow...this is so amazing...I tried to do low speed like this but never worked...
u used tripod rite?
π: 0 β©: 1
PictureElement In reply to cyclopsmine [2009-10-22 10:17:54 +0000 UTC]
Thanks very much.
Of course, you do have to use a tripod in order not to shake the camera. The longer the exposures are the more steadier the tripod has to be actually.
Then it's pretty simple actually. Light has to be low (or you have to use a neutral density filter that absorbs the most amount of light). You have to have some moving objects in it of course. The shutter speed you choose depends on the amount of light, the aperture you choose, and the speed of the object you're photographing. For this one I set a shutter of 0.5 secs because the backflowing water was rather fast and the light quite low. If I had wanted more blurred water I should have chosen a shutter like 1 or 2 minutes.
Hope that helped.
π: 0 β©: 1
gabmonteiro9389 [2009-07-24 01:04:08 +0000 UTC]
Oh, my god!!! This is wonderful!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
moofie421 [2009-07-23 17:29:22 +0000 UTC]
that's amazing!
π: 0 β©: 1
klemons12 [2009-07-16 22:23:46 +0000 UTC]
Do you know the aperture and ISO?
π: 0 β©: 1
PictureElement In reply to klemons12 [2009-07-19 11:21:42 +0000 UTC]
of course I know:
ISO 200
f22 in order to get 0.5 sec of shutter speed
π: 0 β©: 1
PictureElement In reply to dwth [2009-06-05 17:52:32 +0000 UTC]
Thanks a lot mate!
π: 0 β©: 0
getcarter [2009-03-08 21:32:57 +0000 UTC]
exellent shot, colors, light and composition - all outstanding
π: 0 β©: 1
cschoeps [2009-02-07 23:41:05 +0000 UTC]
Geiles Bild und und auch prima belichtet!
π: 0 β©: 1
Reverine [2009-02-01 17:18:49 +0000 UTC]
Hi, your pic has been featured here [link]
π: 0 β©: 1
flowersofcarnage [2008-12-09 00:49:09 +0000 UTC]
one word: amazing!
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>