HOME | DD

poasterchild — I'll Pick Up My Rifle When. . .

Published: 2012-06-18 23:04:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 2774; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 39
Redirect to original
Description Please disseminate widely, thank you! This does not give permission to alter or claim credit for this re-mixed work, for which I retain all copyrights. The original illustration is in the public domain.

If you disagree with the views expressed here, please be sure to read my Policy Statement BEFORE you post: [link]


Best viewed while listening to this: [link]

When it comes to accountability, you’d probably hope that the US military would be rather exacting, right? Sorry. The answer to the seemingly simple question, “How many military bases does America have outside of our own country?” is not at all simple.

In a recent article in Asia Times, investigative reporter Nick Turse calls the answer to that question, “…the one number no American knows. Not the president. Not the Pentagon. Not the experts. No one.”

You can’t get a consistent answer from news stories, that’s for sure. Recent articles, media reports and op-eds peg the number variously at 460, 507, 560, 662 and more than 1,000. Depending on whom you ask or what source you consult, writes Turse:

“there are more than 1,000 US military bases dotting the globe. To be specific, the most accurate count is 1,077. Unless it’s 1,088. Or, if you count differently, 1,169. Or even 1,180. Actually, the number might even be higher. Nobody knows for sure.”

Going straight to the source [of course, of course] doesn’t help, either. According to the Department of Defense’s 2010 Base Structure Report, as of 2009, the US military maintained 662 foreign sites in 38 countries around the world. But that number represents a reduction from numbers reported by DOD just a few years ago.

Military spokespersons regularly add to the confusion. Turse notes that:

Speaking before the senate appropriations committee’s sub-committee on military construction, veterans and related agencies early last year, Deputy Under Secretary of Defense Dorothy Robyn referenced the Pentagon’s “507 permanent installations”. The Pentagon’s 2010 Base Structure Report, on the other hand, lists 4,999 total sites in the US, its territories, and overseas.

Turse has done his homework, consulting official sources and interviewing military officials who are supposedly responsible for keeping track of these things. His account of his journey through the world of military recordkeeping reads like something straight out of Franz Kafka. Numbers vary from office to office and report to report. They go up, and they go down. They’re based on varying criteria, depending on who’s doing the counting. He ends up feeling confused and dismayed.

Along the way to [the] “final” tally, I was offered a number of explanations – from different methods of accounting to the failure of units in the field to provide accurate information – for the conflicting numbers I had been given. After months of exchanging e-mails and seeing the numbers swing wildly, ending up with roughly the same count in November as I began with in January suggests that the US command isn’t keeping careful track of the number of bases in Afghanistan. Apparently, the military simply does not know how many bases it has in its primary theater of operations.

Worse yet are the apparently deliberate omissions from the tally. “Scan the Department of Defense’s 2010 Base Structure Report for sites in Afghanistan,” writes Turse. “Go ahead, read through all 206 pages. You won’t find a mention of them, not a citation, not a single reference, not an inkling that the United States has even one base in Afghanistan, let alone more than 400.”

Incredibly, the same blackout applies to Iraq, where published reports in mainstream media outlets put the number of bases in the 80s. So, even the official US military tally underreports our presence by nearly 500 bases. And that’s before you add in other blacked-out sites in places like Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

Also conveniently “forgotten” in the base count are facilities run by other countries on behalf of the US, sites operated covertly by the CIA, and de facto “bases” that float on America’s fleet of aircraft carriers, says Turse.

So, what’s the real number? We don’t know, and it seems clear that nobody is in a big hurry to tell us. Turse concludes that,

In the grand scheme of things, the actual numbers aren’t all that important. Whether the most accurate total is 900 bases, 1,000 bases or 1,100 posts in foreign lands, what’s undeniable is that the US military maintains…an empire of bases so large and shadowy that no one – not even at the Pentagon – really knows its full size and scope…An honest count of US bases abroad – a true, full and comprehensive list – would be a tiny first step in the necessary process of downsizing the global mission.
Related content
Comments: 13

tonybricker [2012-07-11 23:51:39 +0000 UTC]

This completely has nothing to do with the message of your piece - but I'm wondering how you can claim copyright on this or any of the other classic images you use for your work? Are these pieces public domain? I know some of them are from very famous artists and illustrators, and would be surprised if they weren't protected by foundations etc.

It's also funny that you are telling others not to alter the art, when all they would need to do is go find the same source image you did and put their own text on it like you did to "alter" it without even crediting the original artist. I hope you can see some irony in that.

These are sincere questions, I am somewhat familiar with copyright and legal issues as pertaining to art and graphic design imagery because of my profession, but have never run into it in this context. I would love to hear your thoughts on it. Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

poasterchild In reply to tonybricker [2012-07-12 02:39:37 +0000 UTC]

I've explained this so many times I'm simply not interested in doing it again. But, in brief:

I do not claim copyright to the originals, but only to my re-mixes of them.

I tell people that they are not permitted to alter my stuff, because I do not want people corrupting my political messages, or claiming ownership of the re-mixes that I create. If they want to go find the originals and alter those, they are of course welcome to do so. Early on, a deviant here took my permission to "reproduce and disseminate widely" as authorization to put his name on my stuff and post it in his gallery as his work. That's not what I had in mind, capice?

If you look in my Journal, there is an entry titled "The Copyright Law" that fully explains my position on the issues you raise.

There is a second, earlier, entry, entitled "BALD-FACED PLAGIARISM" that describes the incident that led me to use the language you apparently disagree with.

Please read both entries.

I am not interested in further discussion of this issue. If you continue by way of a reply, I'll ban you from posting any more comments in my gallery. Debating the ins and outs of the copyright law is not my purpose in being here. My purpose in being here is to spread progressive agit-prop. So, your questions have been answered. Please enjoy the poasters. Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

shafigginbob [2012-06-19 16:11:00 +0000 UTC]

This would be wildly surprising, if this was a new occurrence, but sadly this a reoccurring thing. Not just with the U.S. either. You can't look at a country TO DATE that has some form of secret service or major military that doesn't have bases all around the world. It's not paranoia for the next war, just "keeping their enemies close" so to speak. America is just the only talkative one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DanDrazen [2012-06-19 13:40:24 +0000 UTC]

It's like trying to get a tally of civilian casualties during the Iraq War. The otherwise anal-retentive United States military bureaucracy let those numbers sort of sail on by.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dravazed [2012-06-19 02:13:26 +0000 UTC]

Compromise for me, since I *never* advocate war...but hypothetical (and a familiar argument). Done.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LadyRhianwriter [2012-06-19 02:09:42 +0000 UTC]

But. but.. that will mean the Russians have won! (Sticks tongue so far in cheek, it bursts through the skin of the cheek.)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Daedor [2012-06-19 00:19:12 +0000 UTC]

Either the numbers were lost in the redundant bureaucracy, or a genuine effort is being made to disrupt the truth about the numbers.
Regardless of which, even the rough estimate of somewhere between 1000 and 2000 bases in the world is insane.
I've said it before: will the USA please stay in the god damn United States?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

poasterchild In reply to Daedor [2012-06-19 00:47:32 +0000 UTC]

Not that they are countries that I want us to emulate, but the Chinese have no bases outside of the Mainland, and the Russians, 17 by my count, 16 of which are in former Soviet republics. The other one is . . . in Syria, natch.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Daedor In reply to poasterchild [2012-06-19 07:08:44 +0000 UTC]

And exactly because they're countries one wouldn't want to emulate, the fact that they're doing something better is all the more ironic.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

emperorkirkwall [2012-06-18 23:38:37 +0000 UTC]

wow....and we say we arn't policing the world.....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MechaTails7218 In reply to emperorkirkwall [2012-07-03 16:08:04 +0000 UTC]

Policing? More like bullies. Really, really big bullies that stalk their victims absolutely EVERYWHERE.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

emperorkirkwall In reply to MechaTails7218 [2012-07-03 16:16:17 +0000 UTC]

I'll agree with that, America should just stop and allow say...the UN to do it's job.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AxelOfArt [2012-06-18 23:15:26 +0000 UTC]

Wow...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0