Comments: 11
Qilong In reply to cryptidsaurian [2010-05-18 08:23:28 +0000 UTC]
When I first started doing skeletals, I did them complete; but I had to invent a lot of bone, and I didn't like that, so now I show only what's preserved, and to the extent it's preserved. More complete material just updates the skeletal.
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
cryptidsaurian In reply to Qilong [2010-05-18 20:17:50 +0000 UTC]
oops i meant most sorry about that :/
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Qilong In reply to cryptidsaurian [2010-05-19 10:24:06 +0000 UTC]
There are complete specimens referred to Nyctosaurus agilis, the type species. There are also Nyctosaurus nanus and bonneri, which may be the same as agilis, and they are less complete than agilis.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
cryptidsaurian In reply to Qilong [2010-05-19 20:17:47 +0000 UTC]
hm i didn't know that, i thought there was only one discovered :/
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Dingo145 [2009-02-13 14:08:32 +0000 UTC]
You are a idiot!Austroraptor was a bigger than Utahraptor, and Achillobator wass about Utahraptor size, so Austroraptor was bigger than Achillobator and was the biggest raptor!
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
Kevcatalan In reply to Dingo145 [2009-03-23 22:34:54 +0000 UTC]
You retard. You should be happy there are accurate reconsructions of Austroraptor in the first place. I don't see you drawing better than him.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Qilong In reply to Dingo145 [2009-02-14 07:45:39 +0000 UTC]
When did I say one was bigger than the other?
BTW, just insulting someone you do not know for something he never did is extremely rude.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Rodrigo-Vega [2009-01-12 11:28:33 +0000 UTC]
<_> This is the first time I see someonelses drawing of an austroraptor... you see, we made a skull reconstruction that looked something like a spinosaurid, but I think weยดve got reasons to believe its an unenlagid...
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Qilong In reply to Rodrigo-Vega [2009-01-12 14:06:14 +0000 UTC]
Is this another fossil, or a proposition for this taxon/specimen?
๐: 0 โฉ: 0