Comments: 8
Rarayn In reply to mdc01957 [2012-04-24 21:50:37 +0000 UTC]
Aye, it is. Hard to tell, considering that everything about that particular period of Hungarian history seems kind of weird. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mdc01957 In reply to Rarayn [2012-04-25 05:16:03 +0000 UTC]
Yeah. I also got that vibe when looking into to that as well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rarayn In reply to mdc01957 [2012-04-25 07:36:07 +0000 UTC]
The reign of Matthias Corvinus *does* sound like fan-fiction written by Hungary. "Corvinus Hungary of the Renaissance was strong and handsome and smart and intelligent and wiped the floor with all its enemies! It could speak several different languages, and was among the first to employ a professional army. It was also one of the centers of the Renaissance, and had more books than everyone else. PS Prussia sucks in comparison."
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Siveir In reply to Rarayn [2017-02-15 17:37:18 +0000 UTC]
He really was able king and renaissance man, but from my point of view (i'm Czech, i have to say), also forsworn. During Bohemian-Hungary war, Jiri Podebrad's army finally surrounded his Black Legion in near Vilemov. Should the situation be resolved by a battle, Corvinus and his army would be slaughtered - their tactical situation was hopeless. However, our king - the last of our own kings and man who envisioned UN about five hundred years in advance, man of probably the greatest political vision of that milenium - who was also for some time Corvinus father-in-law before his daughter died, let Corvinus go without retaliation for a promise to stop the war. Corvinus made that promise and contiuned the war. So, there are two sied of the coin - as allways, of course. Sorry for such non-artiscical comment. The flag is good and if you have no objection, I'd like to use it in my alternate history work (where the battle of Vilemov took place... and Corvinus lost hard, naturally... )
👍: 0 ⏩: 0