HOME | DD

Rarayn β€” Kingdom of Lithuania 1562 Map by-nc-nd

Published: 2011-09-02 13:29:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 30284; Favourites: 151; Downloads: 255
Redirect to original
Description --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commentary
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a map of the Kingdom of Lithuania from my "Riga-verse" TL. It's shown with it's more important internal divisions, including those seen in the Duchy of Riga 1562 map. Riga suddenly seems a lot less important when compared to Lithuania, huh?

Anyway, I'll probably go into the historical background in more detail later, but here's a quick overview:
- Moscow was burned by Mongols when it was still a minor trading post in the woods. (The main PoD of the TL. Results in a lot of butterflies.)

- The Polish nobles fail to intercept the Lithuanian crown after the Meeting of Lutsk, meaning that Vytautas the Great is crowned King of Lithuania. Results in pretty bad relations between Poland and Lithuania. Lithuania is best-buddies with Hungary though, which puts Poland in a rather awkward position.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extra information
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A bigger version of the Lithuanian flag can be found here: [link]

The compass rose was found here: [link]

The paper textures were found here: [link]

I used this as my basemap: [link]
Related content
Comments: 86

vytra [2017-12-11 18:36:47 +0000 UTC]

- Middle European Union (MEU).

Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ratkabratka [2017-12-03 17:23:13 +0000 UTC]

i saw it on one lithuanian facebook group and they viewed it as real map.... facepalm (i am lithuanian myself thats why i saw)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Heldric In reply to ratkabratka [2017-12-31 06:45:30 +0000 UTC]

Popped up on a lithuanian facebook group I'm a part of too literally 30 minutes ago just about to link to it now and say its not real.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TomasDRE [2014-02-20 07:26:45 +0000 UTC]

AND THATS HOW ITS SHOULD BE AND MUST BE !!!!!!!! ITS ALWAYS WAS THE SAME AND WILL BE !!!! SARMATIANS-LITHUANIANS had this lands for 1000's of years and must get them back !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RebelOfGod In reply to TomasDRE [2017-06-29 09:51:24 +0000 UTC]

As a lithuanian I agree.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ruiner3000 [2013-08-16 13:14:34 +0000 UTC]

I'm Lithuanian and can say just wow! Flattering map! Now let's go and try to built time machine!


πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BrownPoo [2013-06-26 09:16:55 +0000 UTC]

Pretty, pretty map really well thought out too, particularly the alternate history...only thing that irks me slightly is whether a constitutional monarchy could've existed in that expansive an area, particularly at that time.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to BrownPoo [2013-06-26 10:15:55 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

About constitutional monarchy...You have a point. Constitutional monarchies were pretty rare in the 16th century too. No idea why I wrote that back when I made the map.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ragehard [2013-02-03 15:27:08 +0000 UTC]

This is basically Lithuanian-Rus, isn't it?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to Ragehard [2013-02-03 20:34:23 +0000 UTC]

the Grand Duchy of Lithuania considered itself the successor to the old Kievan Rus' for a long time historically, so that's quite fitting, is it not?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ragehard In reply to Rarayn [2013-03-10 02:35:04 +0000 UTC]

Indeed it did I study Russian History at uni, it came up

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

propocorned [2013-02-01 00:24:35 +0000 UTC]

[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to propocorned [2013-02-01 00:28:27 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I used that as my basemap for this map. I even said as much in the deviation description.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RadioFlue [2013-01-28 22:49:40 +0000 UTC]

"- The Polish nobles fail to intercept the Lithuanian crown after the Meeting of Lutsk, meaning that Vytautas the Great is crowned King of Lithuania." ???

What rewriting of history is this?
Vytautas was never crowned as King of Lithuania because the crown was stolen by the Polish. He died without being crowned in 1430 by the official history.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

TomasDRE In reply to RadioFlue [2014-02-20 07:33:23 +0000 UTC]

Yes it was stoled by the polishes... as most of the history hidden ! But times came up, when all true is getting out and showing,that Lithuanians always was a Monarchy, Kingdom, thats how all the Europe was calling them and their Kings. grand dutchy its just a name that came from far east and was misunderstood by polish lowbrainers and wanted to reduce Lithuanians as a nation. But now we getting all the evidence, that its been KINGDOM and STAYED as a kingdom, just started to being called differently, which doesnt change its status !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Rarayn In reply to RadioFlue [2013-01-28 23:24:09 +0000 UTC]

The idea was not to produce a factual account of the history of Lithuania at the time, but to create an alternate timeline exploring what could have happened if Vytautas DID get the crown.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RadioFlue In reply to Rarayn [2013-04-25 07:20:55 +0000 UTC]

That is nice then, like in the games. The thing is, that some of my friends took it for real and were planning to make posters of it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to RadioFlue [2013-04-25 07:49:05 +0000 UTC]

Haha, I see. Why did they want to make a poster of it? School project or something?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RadioFlue In reply to Rarayn [2013-04-25 08:14:36 +0000 UTC]

No, to hang it on their wall, like a thing of history. Decoration. They are Lithuanians. You know, if people come to visit, they can look at it, speak about it It is partially true, Lithuania was quite big, from the Baltic sea to the Black sea

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pietroschek [2012-12-02 16:46:57 +0000 UTC]

I was just reminded of 'Crusader Kings 2' PC game...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to Pietroschek [2012-12-02 16:54:46 +0000 UTC]

Haha, yeah. Almost makes me want to try making a mega Lithuania in CK2 myself sometime. Been a while since the last time I played.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Pietroschek In reply to Rarayn [2012-12-02 17:03:14 +0000 UTC]

CK2 was much improved and yes, Lithuania could become really big, either by crushing the Norse pagans or by making vassals until King of Russia is possible!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to Pietroschek [2012-12-02 17:17:04 +0000 UTC]

The last time I played I played as a ZΓ€hringer King of Bavaria. Was a pretty fun game. The game gets a bit too easy when you're safe within the HRE though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Pietroschek In reply to Rarayn [2012-12-02 17:20:50 +0000 UTC]

Can't say, had just finished the demo. I rewrote files in the common folder, more siege losses and such...

HRE... true for Bavaria, yet only if you don't go to become emperor of HRE yourself???

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to Pietroschek [2012-12-02 17:36:04 +0000 UTC]

I was careful to avoid getting elected Emperor for the most part. The time I did get elected, I tried cleaning up the mess the Empire had become by centralizing it under the various royal titles. Destroyed it in the end though, which was not really a bad thing for me at the time. Pretty much made me the undisputed hegemon of Germany without the inconvenience of the Imperial title.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Pietroschek In reply to Rarayn [2012-12-02 17:41:26 +0000 UTC]

Yep! Sounds like the Ai troubles with Byzantium in CK1 ... it was usually lost to Seljut Turks in 1st ten years... after that Europe falls quickly, as Spain ... is never united enough to hold back the wrath of Islam!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to Pietroschek [2012-12-02 18:42:55 +0000 UTC]

Islam got screwed in my CK1 playthrough where I become the Christian king of Egypt though. Managed to convert almost every single province of Egypt into Christian religion and Breton culture lol.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Pietroschek In reply to Rarayn [2012-12-02 19:47:15 +0000 UTC]

No joke, me too. Usually King of Arabia and Egypt, so I can create strong vassals as buffers...

Jerusalem with Arabia is fine too, as Baghdad has one more university and much infrastructure all around...

Sadly Deus Vult edition destroyed some scripts which made vassal AI smarter...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TobiasVonTobiasov [2012-10-14 19:07:41 +0000 UTC]

Map is nice but mot probable would be if Poland supported Kievian Rus. Than Lithuania would have only tooday Belarus teritories.

Bat artwork is awesome. :3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kazumikikuchi [2012-03-11 03:36:11 +0000 UTC]

I like this map.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to kazumikikuchi [2012-03-11 08:19:28 +0000 UTC]

Glad to hear it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MspnDev [2011-09-17 17:15:04 +0000 UTC]

kingdom of lithuanians occupants??

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to MspnDev [2011-09-17 17:18:53 +0000 UTC]

Could you rephrase your question? I am not sure if I understood what you meant.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TobiasVonTobiasov In reply to Rarayn [2012-10-14 19:08:25 +0000 UTC]

He ment that in Lithuanian country Lithuanians were only 20% of population.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

spineless-laugh [2011-09-09 23:25:05 +0000 UTC]

Connection between Russia and Europe overseen by one country?
Not happenin'.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to spineless-laugh [2011-09-09 23:46:21 +0000 UTC]

It did happen historically, and the Lithuania then was weaker and faced by stronger enemies.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

spineless-laugh In reply to Rarayn [2011-09-10 22:01:17 +0000 UTC]

Oh yeah, I forgot. Sorry. So did its neighbours team up and seek to destroy it/split it up?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to spineless-laugh [2011-09-13 09:16:17 +0000 UTC]

There is not even a sliver of unity among the Russian principalities, and Lithuania and Hungary have a common enemy in Poland. Lithuania will fall eventually, but it's currently in its "golden age".

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Conturi-Hakudoushi [2011-09-04 15:21:28 +0000 UTC]

Very good work))
If this not alternate))

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to Conturi-Hakudoushi [2011-09-05 09:13:31 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. Did you mean that this is good work if it is not alternate, or am I misunderstanding something here?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Conturi-Hakudoushi In reply to Rarayn [2011-09-05 18:42:45 +0000 UTC]

I just do not like alternate history))

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to Conturi-Hakudoushi [2011-09-05 18:47:36 +0000 UTC]

Well, just about all my work is alternate history, so I'll have to disappoint you in that case, hehe. n_n'

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Conturi-Hakudoushi In reply to Rarayn [2011-09-05 19:04:34 +0000 UTC]

Nothing) Works all the same good))

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Darkaiz [2011-09-03 22:47:24 +0000 UTC]

I think the "Vilnius" text should be bigger, considering it's the capital, otherwhise I love it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to Darkaiz [2011-09-04 00:01:52 +0000 UTC]

Good call. Increased the text size a bit, but I couldn't make it much bigger, as that would put it on the same level as whole territories within Lithuania.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Darkaiz In reply to Rarayn [2011-09-04 12:46:18 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Optimus01 [2011-09-03 12:54:40 +0000 UTC]

The map looks great ! But since it's not alternative history, i must tell you about a few mistakes.
I see the year is 1562, therefore the Kingdom of Hungary doesn't exist anymore cose it was destroyed at the Battle of Mohacs in 1526 and becomed the Vilayet of Buda. Also the Principality of Transylvania a separate semi-independent country under Ottoman suzeranity !
That's it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to Optimus01 [2011-09-03 13:04:49 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

I don't know what makes you say that this isn't alternate history, but it is. Hungary exists as an independent entity - a powerful one at that - due to Matthias Corvinus having a legitimate and worthy heir in this timeline. The Ottomans were unable to crush Hungary the way they did OTL due to Hungary still having the Black Brigade at their disposal, as well as considerable internal stability.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Optimus01 In reply to Rarayn [2011-09-03 13:16:12 +0000 UTC]

Sorry i wasn't paying to much attention at these details, cose i've seen that much of it resembled the real history, i just thought this must be a map that wanted to recreate the political situation from those ages.
But since you say that is "alternative" than it's ok

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rarayn In reply to Optimus01 [2011-09-03 13:30:31 +0000 UTC]

I generally try to be very conservative and careful with the results of my PoDs when writing serious alternate history. It it seems historical at first glance, that's actually positive.

The changes are actually pretty obvious if you're familiar with Lithuanian, Baltic and Russian history though. There's no Russia or Grand Duchy of Muscovy, the Baltic region has been divided very differently from OTL and Lithuania is an independent kingdom that hates Poland. It also annexed the Crimean Khanate, which never happened OTL.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>