Comments: 66
beaubot [2011-07-13 00:57:41 +0000 UTC]
very nice.
π: 0 β©: 1
aerostato [2008-01-07 00:21:43 +0000 UTC]
yes i had lokked this before.i liked it too. ;9 is one of my favorites
π: 0 β©: 0
FlowComa [2007-08-15 02:51:50 +0000 UTC]
That is brilliant man.
π: 0 β©: 1
rawimage In reply to toxicnun [2007-05-28 19:21:57 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! PKD's cool indeed
π: 0 β©: 0
khamuslestat [2007-05-09 15:55:46 +0000 UTC]
hermosa pieza grΓ‘fica
π: 0 β©: 1
happysho3s [2007-04-03 14:36:12 +0000 UTC]
i loved the book and i love this
π: 0 β©: 1
rawimage In reply to happysho3s [2007-04-03 18:32:05 +0000 UTC]
thanks! have you seen the flic as well?
π: 0 β©: 1
Twisted-optimism [2007-01-16 03:02:42 +0000 UTC]
Very nice.
_Favorites_
π: 0 β©: 0
muted-pain [2006-12-01 09:16:59 +0000 UTC]
a powerful image indeed.
π: 0 β©: 1
trytosurvive [2006-11-15 17:57:31 +0000 UTC]
perfect!..
π: 0 β©: 1
JeremyBrotherton [2006-11-14 01:25:47 +0000 UTC]
With out reading anything I tought to myself this is how I feel in the world.
π: 0 β©: 1
miyoshimasato [2006-11-11 23:34:50 +0000 UTC]
wow...!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
kayceeus [2006-11-10 19:52:41 +0000 UTC]
I like this effect, very nice!
π: 0 β©: 1
sputnikpixel [2006-11-10 12:05:08 +0000 UTC]
Das erinnert mich stark an "Schule" von Michael Wesely: [link] Das dΓΌrfte vom Grundprinzip dieselbe Technik sein. Faszinierend solche experimentellen Arbeiten.
π: 0 β©: 1
rawimage In reply to sputnikpixel [2006-11-10 14:49:32 +0000 UTC]
Wow! in der Tat die selbe Technik. Muss das mal mit Fotos probieren bei denen ich die Belichtungszeit durch die Anzahl der Aufnahmen teile um am Ende eine "normale" Belichtung zu erhalten.. hmmm
Danke fΓΌr den Link!
π: 0 β©: 1
sputnikpixel In reply to rawimage [2006-11-10 14:57:50 +0000 UTC]
Kann man bspw bei Photomatix nicht auch mehrere Bilder als "average" zusammenfΓΌgen? Da sollte keine Unter- oder Γberbelichtung auftreten. Na nΓ€chste Woche hab ich Zeit das mal auszuprobieren.
π: 0 β©: 1
mgilpin [2006-11-09 22:38:46 +0000 UTC]
one... it is great to see you taking inspiration from something other than a visual art...
two... love to see phillip dick quoted...
three... great image... really successful...
four... the 'gothica' reference... very smart...
π: 0 β©: 1
rawimage In reply to mgilpin [2006-11-10 11:39:02 +0000 UTC]
four time thank you!
was it clear for you that I quoted PKD? I don't want people think these are my words.
π: 0 β©: 2
mgilpin In reply to rawimage [2006-11-11 01:24:27 +0000 UTC]
you're welcome (x4)...
yes... it was clear it was a quote...
π: 0 β©: 0
mgilpin In reply to rawimage [2006-11-11 01:24:21 +0000 UTC]
you're welcome (x4)...
yes... it was clear it was a quote...
π: 0 β©: 0
alltheantics [2006-11-09 12:44:58 +0000 UTC]
This is almost luminous!
Great job.
π: 0 β©: 1
ashveenp [2006-11-09 07:16:34 +0000 UTC]
this is sooooo superb!
you've actually managed to convey that feeling of movement, of dynamics, of things fighting to come to the surface, or hide themselves deep down...
something in the intention reminds me of francis bacon.
π: 0 β©: 1
aerostato [2006-11-09 01:35:01 +0000 UTC]
this is wonderfull work.
im now reading a book of philip k. dick.
dont knoew the name in english.(los clanes de la luna alfana)
but you surely got the atmosphear of him when i read it.
π: 0 β©: 1
lythron [2006-11-08 20:09:44 +0000 UTC]
WOW, this is great. I also thought it was an oil painting. Great mood here. Im really itching to know how you did this? Care for sharing some pshop secrets?
π: 0 β©: 1
rawimage In reply to lythron [2006-11-08 20:42:38 +0000 UTC]
Thank you!
read this [link]
this is a psd with almost 60 (!) layers. some in overlay some in screen mode. otherwise it would have turned totally black...
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>