Comments: 31
DKFDenial [2019-02-07 04:37:34 +0000 UTC]
I think I'll be purchasing this one next!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RedFireD0g In reply to DKFDenial [2019-02-07 07:12:41 +0000 UTC]
The first chapter is free, and the first three chapters come in a pack with Roman Nights for around $13.00
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DKFDenial In reply to RedFireD0g [2019-02-07 12:12:07 +0000 UTC]
Sweet! Can you please send me that link to purchase?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DKFDenial [2018-10-16 19:20:34 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lounlysoul007 [2015-03-24 17:29:43 +0000 UTC]
All Of Them Going To Meet Their Fate!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
butre3004 [2015-01-13 17:35:58 +0000 UTC]
mmmmm. great work! inspired in Spartacus?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RedFireD0g In reply to butre3004 [2015-01-13 19:42:20 +0000 UTC]
I haven't seen more than a couple random episodes of the show, and the ones I saw seemed more concerned with patricians throwing parties than people fighting in the arena, but lfcfan, who's doing most of the writing, is a fan of the show. I was inspired as much by Gladiator and Game of Thrones as anything.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RedFireD0g In reply to billyjoebob44 [2015-01-14 00:04:37 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, I'm glad you like her! The violence will be pretty mild in the first installment, although things will get more intense as the comic goes on.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gtsboytoy [2015-01-13 14:30:56 +0000 UTC]
This is great! Several men and a smaller woman pitted against the gigantic, dominating, female beast.
The Gladiatrix story line is my favorite. Nipple vore is hot too.
Thanks for sharing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RedFireD0g In reply to gtsboytoy [2015-01-13 21:27:17 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! This comic is sort of a continuation of the gladiatrix storyline in Pax Romana. It might even have the same gladiatrix character later on...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WhippetWild [2015-01-13 12:51:00 +0000 UTC]
She looks great.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
IanWolf44 [2015-01-13 00:14:23 +0000 UTC]
the tallest is really hot
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bootylover518 [2015-01-12 23:05:21 +0000 UTC]
She's thick in the right spot. Haha looks great can't wait
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MrSinister1990 [2015-01-12 21:10:38 +0000 UTC]
I choose death by snu snu
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kapotte In reply to MrSinister1990 [2015-01-13 00:29:59 +0000 UTC]
Azir from lol says: The order is given!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Big-ELSA [2015-01-12 20:45:28 +0000 UTC]
looks amazing ^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RedFireD0g In reply to zhengguoguangxi [2015-01-12 20:56:07 +0000 UTC]
Nah, this girl be thick. The other giantesses in the comic will be thinner, though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ryuunanaji In reply to RedFireD0g [2015-01-13 10:51:20 +0000 UTC]
I'm inclined to agree with the person whose username I dare not try to pronounce, but it's part of RFD style and and has it's own appeal (I wouldn't wish it changed).
The perception of beauty and aesthetic pleasure has been closely linked to the golden ratio, but in the same breath, breaking away from this general preference gives rise to other artistic values.
By exaggerating appealing and defining features, it gives the object/person a certain focus. But equally speaking, it detracts from the fundamental basis of the thing in the first place. Consider the example of gigantic, fancy looking swords. They look cool and draw attention, but detract from the believability and practicality of their use.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RedFireD0g In reply to ryuunanaji [2015-01-13 20:17:12 +0000 UTC]
Her proportions aren't THAT far-fetched. Rare, sure, but there are actual women with similar proportions, or close to it.
I wouldn't buy too much into the golden ratio idea, at least not as far as perception of physical attractiveness goes. Physical attractiveness varies heavily from person to person, and is influenced as much by culture and individual perception as it is by inborn and genetic traits. The idea of the golden ratio goes back to antiquity, sure, but so does the idea that imbalances in the four humors cause disease, and that idea had similarly long legs.
Golden ratios are one of many potentially useful tools for looking at aesthetics and composition, but they're not the only thing that determines beauty. Also, attempts to "prove" the importance of the golden ratio by looking at typical human proportions are influenced by confirmation bias. Leonardo Da Vinci's Vetruvian Man has a golden rectangle that can be traced from the head and fingertips to the belly button, but what's so important about the belly button? One could just as easily extend the rectangle to the hips or thighs, and end up with an entirely different ratio.
Besides, our notions of physical attractiveness are only partially influenced by aesthetics. Primary and secondary sexual characteristics, as well as other indicators of youth, fertility, good genes and good health, are every bit as important as aesthetics. Many of these things are also positively correlated with aesthetic values, and may even correspond with certain applications of the golden ratio, but that doesn't mean the golden ratio is what makes them attractive. Again, culture, upbringing and individual variance also have a huge impact on sexual attraction, as well as aesthetic tastes. If they didn't, we wouldn't see such a huge variation between cultures and individuals as to what's considered attractive and visually pleasing.
cogsci.stackexchange.com/quest…
goldenratiomyth.weebly.com/the…
www.maa.org/external_archive/d…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ryuunanaji In reply to RedFireD0g [2015-01-14 10:54:13 +0000 UTC]
Haha, wow... don't get me wrong here, you and I are more or less of the same mind. But I understand that in my efforts to be non-contentious, I may have made my point hard to grasp. And yes, likening her proportions to that of a great fantasy sword, may have been a little unfair.
Please note, in the same sentence I adduced the (general) association between the golden ratio and aesthetics, I also pointed out that nonconforming elements also exist (to great effect) throughout art. I doesn't take fact, research or statistics for things to become ascribed to one-another, just a sizable, source-able or reputable consensus (hence the four humours among a mountain of other fallacies have been, and some still are, attributed as fact).
Be careful, though, how strongly you argue for variation in appeal. The fact that art works, that one piece can move millions of hearts, is proof enough that there is a great degree of conformity within perception among humans. I agree that immense variation exists, but it exists in juxtaposition with phenomenal similarity.
Thanks for the links, they were good to read.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0