HOME | DD

Redundant-Cat β€” Kantai Collection Alternate:Battlecruiser Saratoga

Published: 2016-11-21 01:25:40 +0000 UTC; Views: 5158; Favourites: 101; Downloads: 51
Redirect to original
Description The planned Lexington Class battlecruiser form of the newly added Saratoga in Kantai Collection. Due to the Washington Naval Treaty, she like Kaga and Akagi was converted into the carrier form that everyone knows and loves. I kept the outfit very similar to her standard one with only minor changes.Β 

The armament is based off the second revision of the design with eight 16" guns in four turrets (as opposed to ten 14" guns). Secondaries are 6"/53 casemates (and derpy handgun that is a crude combination of an M1911 pistol and on of these 6" guns)

To those that are going for her in the Fall event good luck (Even if she is not my most anticipated ship from the new event ships, and she is not the same type I know I will )
Related content
Comments: 26

Ohaxer [2019-12-25 20:30:36 +0000 UTC]

SO CUTE

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bomsteinam [2019-01-02 04:46:27 +0000 UTC]

GORGEOUS!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Redundant-Cat In reply to bomsteinam [2019-01-03 03:37:14 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

bomsteinam In reply to Redundant-Cat [2019-01-03 03:51:48 +0000 UTC]

Your Very Welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nathanielnguyen504 [2016-11-21 19:47:03 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Redundant-Cat In reply to nathanielnguyen504 [2016-11-22 01:19:17 +0000 UTC]

?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nathanielnguyen504 In reply to Redundant-Cat [2017-06-13 00:25:29 +0000 UTC]

NVM

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

amirrrrruuuddddddiin [2016-11-21 09:55:55 +0000 UTC]

Well she and Lexington would have been the finest battlecruisers in the US Navy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Redundant-Cat In reply to amirrrrruuuddddddiin [2016-11-22 01:19:11 +0000 UTC]

Yeah for her time she would have indeed been very powerful, though on the same hand if she had been built as a battlecruiser, should probably would have soon have been passed by in the growing battleship arms race that would have existed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

amirrrrruuuddddddiin In reply to Redundant-Cat [2017-01-12 12:27:41 +0000 UTC]

Sorry for only asking now but Β are Saratoga's arms restrained to her sides?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Redundant-Cat In reply to amirrrrruuuddddddiin [2017-01-12 14:42:01 +0000 UTC]

I guess I tried to rush with this one so the pose turned out a bit stiff. The fishnets on her arms are just supposed to act as arm covers of sorts (representing cage masts)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

amirrrrruuuddddddiin In reply to Redundant-Cat [2017-01-13 07:26:29 +0000 UTC]

I wasn't referring to the fishnets on her arms. I referring to the metal brace that goes around her torso and arms under her breasts.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Redundant-Cat In reply to amirrrrruuuddddddiin [2017-01-13 07:58:40 +0000 UTC]

On second look I guess I didn't add enough contrast on that portion, but it is actually two parts. She has a band around her arm (Not really connected to anything just more for battleship look) and a separate brace around her body to support the equipment.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

amirrrrruuuddddddiin In reply to Redundant-Cat [2017-01-13 08:44:27 +0000 UTC]

Oh 0.0, sorry, I couldn't tell the difference between the two. Sorry Cat.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Redundant-Cat In reply to amirrrrruuuddddddiin [2017-01-13 15:00:17 +0000 UTC]

No problem.

Again I kind of rushed this one more than usual so I didn't give it the once over I should have before posting. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

amirrrrruuuddddddiin In reply to Redundant-Cat [2017-01-14 03:55:16 +0000 UTC]

We all make mistakes. That's life for you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

amirrrrruuuddddddiin In reply to Redundant-Cat [2016-11-22 08:55:47 +0000 UTC]

That's true but that would have caused war between the Royal Navy and the US Navy and seeing how the US was the economic giant it was growing to be, it is not hard to see the US becoming the victors in the said war.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

HansSuzuki [2016-11-21 09:28:45 +0000 UTC]

:v

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ace-Express [2016-11-21 02:47:30 +0000 UTC]

I love these so much. Do you plan to keep going?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Redundant-Cat In reply to Ace-Express [2016-11-21 04:04:24 +0000 UTC]

Yeah from time to time, but sometimes I am just too lazy to draw the fancy over the top equipment setups.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Icelance669 [2016-11-21 01:53:19 +0000 UTC]

I see you heard the exciting news.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Redundant-Cat In reply to Icelance669 [2016-11-21 02:08:43 +0000 UTC]

Yes the introduction of Commandant Teste means more ships of the Best Navy will come!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Icelance669 In reply to Redundant-Cat [2016-11-21 02:22:53 +0000 UTC]

Well yeah, but America isn't the best so to speak. They always have to start somewhere.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Redundant-Cat In reply to Icelance669 [2016-11-21 02:28:23 +0000 UTC]

*cough* when I use the word "Best Navy" I am not referring to the US Navy, check the new ship list

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Icelance669 In reply to Redundant-Cat [2016-11-21 02:38:52 +0000 UTC]

Ah... Yes, France. Hate to say it, but France was more of a liability to both sides than an asset.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Redundant-Cat In reply to Icelance669 [2016-11-21 04:03:06 +0000 UTC]

I will say strong military, but weak leaders. Either way, they do have a lot of interesting weapons and vehicles that fall underneath most people's radar.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Icelance669 In reply to Redundant-Cat [2016-11-21 04:45:24 +0000 UTC]

Okay true on that, I admit, because in the final cutscenes in the good Waterloo ending of Napoleon total war, the narrator said this, "Glory like that, can only survive once."
Though I question one thing from the French Navy, even if some of them were ground (or sea XD) breaking for their time. Which is the Dunkurqe-class, not that I'm saying she was a bad design, it was a good design. However I do question the placement of all of the secondary guns.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0