Comments: 14
drawing425 [2015-12-11 03:52:25 +0000 UTC]
What a view.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rlkitterman In reply to drawing425 [2015-12-11 04:55:34 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! I wish I could have seen it back in the 1950s or so.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
drawing425 In reply to rlkitterman [2015-12-11 05:39:31 +0000 UTC]
Well today, my University's Japanese sensei has been to Umekoji when he was in his elementary age. He brought up the topic before an oral test about my English essay I wrote about myself and honestly mentioned I was a rail enthusiast and wised to visit Umekoji. He said the museum is a beautiful place for rail enthusiasts to visit and how it has the atmosphere of Japan's golden age of steam. He told me about how the romance of Japanese steam railway became a symbol of emotional nostalgia, excitement and a bygone era for Japanese train enthusiasts. By enthusiasts, he said that these days, trains are a hobby for young children like Thomas the tank engine. He knows that adults, like salary men he remembers in his time, also parents and grandparents who are around during the age of steam also admire these black beauties as a hobby because it is part of their life, and it is part of their own world.
He also wished me that in the future, I will go visit the museum and experience the nostalgia he told me about Japanese age of steam myself. And see the roundhouse engines with my own eyes and possibly see a real life steam engine in full steam.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SteamRailwayCompany [2015-11-18 02:48:33 +0000 UTC]
Any C51s or C53s in there? The C51s were my favorite Japanese Pacific class.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rlkitterman In reply to SteamRailwayCompany [2015-11-21 20:16:09 +0000 UTC]
Not that I can see; the hump toward the rear of the running plate would fit for a C59 Pacific but not for any earlier classes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
rlkitterman In reply to Midway2009 [2015-11-21 20:06:05 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! I'm glad it's still around.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rockyrailroad578 [2015-11-17 23:56:09 +0000 UTC]
It's strange to me to see such a small turntable in contrast to the roundhouse itself! Very efficient on space, and the modellers who made it did a great job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rlkitterman In reply to Rockyrailroad578 [2015-11-21 20:05:49 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! I think there must have been some very strict size limits on JNR.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1