Comments: 8
Johannamarker [2012-06-28 02:49:30 +0000 UTC]
wonderful<33333
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BRipin [2009-10-08 11:32:29 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful and mysterious, well painted.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RonnyVardy In reply to 5-blue-marks [2009-10-08 23:54:08 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, no problem.
I really am curious, what you mean. When you say the background is
a tad distracting. How would you do it differently? Is it the color choice? the texture?
thank you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
5-blue-marks In reply to RonnyVardy [2009-10-10 01:43:36 +0000 UTC]
The painting appears very classical, however the background has a very new aged air brushed look to it. Well just slightly, I shouldn't even be putting them in the same catagory, but it's the best I can come up with. I would expect in a classical painting for the background to be the token nature setting, stuffed with cherubs and gods and goddesses, or to be very dark and sparse as in a Rembrant.
Really, I don't know all for sure because my art history is lacking in a lot of places, but that is just my experience from having been to a lot of museums and having seen a lot of books full of old paintings.
It's such a tiny nitpick though. I just thought I'd try and be constructive instead of just the typical smiley face so I took a good look and thought it out before I commented. I hope that is okay.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RonnyVardy In reply to 5-blue-marks [2009-10-10 22:42:09 +0000 UTC]
totally ok, thank you i appreciate it. I think I was trying to go for the opposite of what was expected and create a background that had more of an edge to it..
Or to not go with something that felt too historical.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jade-meril [2009-10-07 21:41:57 +0000 UTC]
COOL BEANS!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RonnyVardy In reply to jade-meril [2009-10-07 21:52:55 +0000 UTC]
You know beans really are cool, I wish more people agreed on that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0