HOME | DD

Russian-Fox — Mustang

Published: 2012-05-01 05:20:00 +0000 UTC; Views: 946; Favourites: 18; Downloads: 43
Redirect to original
Description P-51D Mustang

Country of Origin: United States
Manufacturer: North American Aviation
Crew: 1 pilot
Length: 32' 3'' (9.85m)
Wingspan: 37' (11.2m)
Height: 13' 8'' (4.16m)
Weight: 7,125 pounds (3,230 kg) empty, 11,600 (5,262 kg) maximum
Powerplant: 1x Turbosupercharged Packard Merlin V-1650-7 12 cylinder liquid cooled inline piston engine with 1,590 horsepower
Maximum Speed: 437 mph (703 kph)
Service Ceiling: 41,900 feet (12,771 m)
Range: 2,080 miles (3,347 km)
Armament: 6x 12.7mm Browning M2 machineguns
Kit Maker and Scale: Testors, 1:48

Considered to be one of the greatest fighter aircraft ever built by the United States and one of the greatest in aviation history, the P-51 Mustang actually traces its ancestry back to Germany in the 1930s. At that time, the U.S. still maintained trade and relations with Germany and several U.S. aerospace engineers were working alongside German engineers. One such example was Edgar Schmued. Working at Bayerische Flugzeug Werke (later Messerschmitt AG) he was involved in much of the design work that went into the soon to be famous Me-109. "I was working on a fighter design of my own all that time," he recounted at an anniversary celebration at Chino. "refining it with new information, waiting for an opportunity. Yes, the Mustang was built in 120 days, but I had been designing it for five years."

Schmued left Germany in 1937 due to the rise of the Nazi Party and their henchmen started looking into his family's history for their so called "racial purity ideals". Naturally, he brought his design work with him and when he returned to North American Aviation, Dutch Kindelberger, one of the company's top executives knew about these designs. Following on a hunch he declined the British Royal Air Force's request for NAA to build P-40s for them. He knew that getting a design developed into blueprints and on the road towards prototypes and testing within 120 days would be an uphill battle, but since he and Schmued already had something to work with, the task was not as difficult as it could have been.

From there, the Mustang was brought to full fruition and the new fighter was first test flown in October of 1940. Due to the power limitations of its powerplant, an Allison V-12, the Mustang's performance above 10,000 feet was appalling. Below that however, agility was supreme and the aircraft was fast and nimble. High altitude performance was needed, both for dogfighting and for escorting the long range bomber raids that were driving deep into Germany on a daily basis. Thus, a new engine was sourced and the powerplant of choice became the Rolls Royce Merlin, built for the Hurricane and Spitfire of the RAF. When installed in the Mustang, it turned turned the low altitude fighter into a supreme high altitude machine.

Most critically however, the Mustang's clean airframe resulted in a long range and great endurance, giving it the needed range to fly alongside the heavy bombers all the way to their targets and back. Prior to the Mustang, most escorts had to turn back due to lack of sufficient fuel supply and the German Air Force knew this; they would lie in ambush for the bombers and would wait until the escorts turned away before attacking. With the Mustang however, the Luftwaffe now had a running dogfight on its hands and intercepting bombers went from almost effortless to nearly suicidal. According to legend, in late 1943, Commander of the Luftwaffe Herman Goring is reported to have seen P-51s flying over Berlin alongside B-17 bombers. When he did, he turned to one of his lieutenants and said "The war is over...we've lost."

One of the fastest and most nimble aircraft available to the Allies, the Mustang was purpose built for the air to air combat role; long range bomber escort, bomber interception and classical dogfighting. Up against the machine that inspired its design, the Me-109, the Mustang left the 109 in the proverbial dust. The Mustang could out-turn the 109 and while the 109 had roughly the same climb rate, the Mustang could out-accelerate the 109. Up against the Fw-190, the Mustang found a matched adversary, however the Mustang was more than capable of taking on the 190 without fear; furthermore if the Mustang could engage the 190 from above 20,000 feet, it could take advantage of the 190's only major weakness, a lack of high altitude performance. Most remarkably though was the Mustang's ability to engage the Me-262 Stormbird jet fighter in combat. Although the Stormbird could outrun, out-climb and out-dive the Mustang, the Mustang had better acceleration and could turn tighter.

Me-262s flying at top speed were nearly invulnerable to attack as they were over 100 mph faster than the Mustang, but Mustang pilots soon learned that they could ambush the Stormbirds down low to the ground. By attacking when the Stormbirds were landing or taking off, they were "easy pickings". Chuck Yeager claimed at least two Stormbirds with his Mustang by doing this, while other pilots brought down several more. Perhaps most remarkable of all Stormbird kills though was Lee Archer's kill. Archer was flying a bomber escort mission over Berlin in 1945, and at an altitude approaching 30,000 feet, he caught sight of two Stormbirds zipping in to intercept a B-17. Knowing the jets were at or near their top speed, he would need every last ounce of performance from his Mustang. He let the jets zip by him and launched into a loop, first climbing up and then diving down from behind the jets. Using gravity to gain a speed boost, the Mustang's clean lines allowed the aircraft to momentarily break the 500 mph mark and close in on the speed of the attacking Stormbirds. With the water-methanol booster running at full power and dumping everything it had into the Mustang's engine, Archer closed the gap between him and the Stormbird flying wingman and opened fire with all six of his machineguns. Scoring multiple hits, he set the Stormbird's engine on fire, sending it plunging towards the ground, the pilot bailing out moments later. Turning his attention to the leader he fired a long, barrel burning burst as his speed boost was rapidly bleeding off. Though the Stormbird leader was getting away, Archer managed to score several hits, resulting in the Stormbird leader trailing smoke. Almost immediately the leader disengaged from the fight and headed back to base, his machine too badly shot up to risk in continued combat.


More Pics:

Cockpit:
[link]

Underside:
[link]

9 o'clock:
[link]

Nose and main gear:
[link]

Head On:
[link]

Aft:
[link]

Fuselage Markings:
[link]

Planform:
[link]

Inspiration for the paint scheme:
[link]
Related content
Comments: 41

ComannderrX [2014-06-22 17:00:26 +0000 UTC]

probably the best allied prop plane, along with the spitfire. too bad the p-51A and p-51B had crappy engines... or so i've heard...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to ComannderrX [2014-06-22 17:57:24 +0000 UTC]

The P-51A had an Allison V1710 engine. The ONLY real problem with that engine was its lack of high altitude performance.
Above 10,000 feet its performance dropped off severely, but below that, it was a throughbred. Chuck Yeager himself agreed; he even commented that the P-51A had perhaps the best airframe to engine harmony and handling he had ever experienced. The P-51A was also the most heavily armed Mustang variant, some of them carried four 20mm cannons.

The P-51B had a Merlin V1650 engine, the same engine used by the Spitfire (all Mustangs starting with the P-51B would use variants of the Merlin engine). This engine gave the Mustang supreme high altitude capability. The trade off was less agility down at low altitude, but due to needing to operate at high altitude in order to escort the B-17 and B-24 raids, this trade off was more than acceptable.

The P-51C had the longest range of all Mustangs, with a range of 2,100 miles. The P-51D, which is what my model is, introduced the "tear drop" bubble canopy that gave supreme visibility, and added two more machineguns bringing the total to six.

The P-51H was the fastest Mustang, and one of the fastest piston engine aircraft in the world. Top speed is 486 mph.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ComannderrX In reply to Russian-Fox [2014-06-22 20:58:24 +0000 UTC]

thats pretty fast for a prop plane!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to ComannderrX [2014-06-23 20:39:34 +0000 UTC]

That it is.
Some of the earliest jets were slower than that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ComannderrX In reply to Russian-Fox [2014-06-24 04:00:13 +0000 UTC]

a jet being slower than a prop plane? really?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to ComannderrX [2014-06-25 01:54:59 +0000 UTC]

Yes.
Some of the early jet engines just did not have enough thrust for high speed flight.

Plus, a number of early jets were built more like prop planes, with areodynamics that were fine for high torque piston engines, but rather poor for jet engines.

The P-59 was one such example. Early models had a top speed of only 400 mph or so. It was a big, heavy airframe better suited to a radial engine like the R-2800 Double Wasp.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ComannderrX In reply to Russian-Fox [2014-06-25 21:45:44 +0000 UTC]

im sure that would have been embarrassing if your were flying a gloster meteor and could not catch up to a prop plane

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to ComannderrX [2014-06-26 01:27:16 +0000 UTC]

Perhaps.
But the early Meteors, like many early jets, were used more for testing and training than combat.

The Metor Mk I was the slow one, but late in World War II, the Meteor Mk. III appeared. It had better speed,
about 525 mph.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SoftShellback [2012-08-23 23:50:43 +0000 UTC]

The Delta model. Very nice! The greatest incarnation of the Mustang!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to SoftShellback [2012-08-24 01:46:39 +0000 UTC]

Much thanks. =3
And indeed, the Delta model was a very good one. I'd like to get a Hotel model, the fastest version.
Historical note: In World War II, it was the Dog model, because the phonetic alphabet was different back then.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

the7kid90 [2012-06-01 02:37:50 +0000 UTC]

A wonderfuly simple plane, rugged and tough. I'd still rather be hidding behind an A-1 SKyraider, P-38 or others but this is a bad ass plane.
Vary nice model, but may I ask ware you get em? I want to see if I cant find my self an A-1 or P-38 model.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to the7kid90 [2012-06-01 03:26:01 +0000 UTC]

Indeed. I prefer the Corsair myself, but the Mustang is a very nice machine. I don't like how it was used as a bomber in Korea though...Mustangs are pure fighters; the only thing you should ever put under a Mustang's wings are drop tanks.

Thanks. I have a P-38 and a Skyraider in my gallery if you'd like to see 'em. =3
I get most of my models online, either ebay or Squadron: [link]
The best brand to get is Tamiya. My Skyraider is a Tamiya kit, and came with not just the ordinance you see on it, but enough to arm 2 aircraft.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

the7kid90 In reply to Russian-Fox [2012-06-01 05:07:29 +0000 UTC]

The Corsair was more of an attack air craft then the Mustang, and your right. Drop tanks are the only think (besides rockets?) that should've been under the wings.

I've seen the 38, and the A-1 I just saw.
Noted.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to the7kid90 [2012-06-02 01:14:41 +0000 UTC]

Indeed it was. The Corsair was purpose built to be a fleet defense fighter, but it was well equipped to take on the ground attack role as well. Its air cooled radial engine also made it less prone to combat damage than the Mustang's liquid cooled inline.
I'd say only drop tanks for the Mustang. While I do favour rockets as weaponry, for the Mustang...just those 6 Brownings in the wings.

*nods*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

the7kid90 In reply to Russian-Fox [2012-06-02 02:09:53 +0000 UTC]

Plus I can imagine, like the old 109's that the radial engine also provieded some type of sheilding agenst the Jap's Zeros. Six browings and a crap load of bombs, hmmmm, I beilve that makes for a good plane XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to the7kid90 [2012-06-03 19:57:46 +0000 UTC]

109s had inline engines. You're thinking the 190. X3
And yes, the engine can provide you protection against enemy fire. Its a solid block of case hardened steel.

Speaking of Brownings...did you know that every single gun used on U.S. aircraft during WWII, regardless of caliber, was a Browning design? From the .30 caliber guns on the Devastators to the massive 37mm cannon on the P-39, all U.S. aircraft guns were designed by John Browning.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

the7kid90 In reply to Russian-Fox [2012-06-04 15:59:32 +0000 UTC]

I stand corrected.
Though granted, a sheild does you little good when you have to bail out of the plane after getting the engine badly shot up.

Intresting fact, that makes sence, one manufature of guns, one person making the parts, so you know who to call when your sending all your planes over seas.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to the7kid90 [2012-06-04 18:33:23 +0000 UTC]

Well yes. But the object isn't to bail out of your plane. Its to make the other fellow bail out of his.
(quoted from a video about flying the P-38. XD)

Indeed.
I think that happened more or less by coincidence though, rather than intention.
During the war itself, Colt, Remington, Winchester, Harrington and Richardson, basically every firearms manufacturer was making the M2, the 1919, the AN-M2 cannon, etc. Hell, even IBM and Rock-ola (a jukebox manufacturer) were making guns.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

the7kid90 In reply to Russian-Fox [2012-06-04 20:20:06 +0000 UTC]

I saw that video lol I knew right away which one you were referring too XD

IBM was around back then? o.o
Dosnt supirse me, it went from 90% focus on Domestic to 90% (concidering we just came out of the depresion when the war broke out, I am guessing) on Military. Hell Ford was making the 1945 Mustang. (lol I am funny)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to the7kid90 [2012-06-06 19:32:23 +0000 UTC]

Ah. XD

Yes it was.
IBM goes back...at least to the 1920s. Might be even further.
Indeed. We quite literally shifted the entire industry base to the war effort. At full speed, we were building aircraft faster than the Luftwaffe could shoot them down. In the time it took to shoot down one U.S. fighter (average dogfight lasts 14 seconds), three more rolled off the assembly lines.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

the7kid90 In reply to Russian-Fox [2012-06-07 16:16:24 +0000 UTC]

I had a lot of respect for the Luftwaffe during the war, thats for sure. But thats kinda sad XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to the7kid90 [2012-06-08 04:23:12 +0000 UTC]

Its all due to attrition replacement. The U.S. sustain it, Germany couldn't.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

the7kid90 In reply to Russian-Fox [2012-06-16 05:52:36 +0000 UTC]

At the same time Logistics might of been a problem. Think of the tet offencive of the Vietnam war, how they moved what suplies they had. They launched one of the biggest attacks in milatary history and didn't even need an air lift.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to the7kid90 [2012-06-18 02:02:34 +0000 UTC]

That too.
Anything that moved on the ground got the crap shot out of it. Hell, I've heard of P47s strafing people on bicycles late in the war. And they weren't just using overkill; often times people would strap up to a dozen Panzerfausts onto bicycles and ride to combat units.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BlueFox284 [2012-05-01 22:22:28 +0000 UTC]

No wonder it was so good. . .A German had a hand in building it. . .lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to BlueFox284 [2012-05-01 23:22:16 +0000 UTC]

Heh, yeah, in a way. XD
Kinda ironic too, the Germans had a hand in their own demise.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

the7kid90 In reply to Russian-Fox [2012-06-01 02:35:41 +0000 UTC]

"Dont punch your self" Comes to mind.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to the7kid90 [2012-06-01 03:20:54 +0000 UTC]

Indeed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DingoPatagonico [2012-05-01 17:01:25 +0000 UTC]

excellent work!! x3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to DingoPatagonico [2012-05-01 23:32:24 +0000 UTC]

Much thanks. =3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SwiftFlyer [2012-05-01 13:58:56 +0000 UTC]

Great looking model! I keep telling those car guys that I want a 1945 Mustang, and they always give me a weird look. I tell them it has 12 cylinders and almost 1600 HP and will hit 400 MPH, and most still say that Ford did not make the Mustang then. I smile and say, 'Who said I was talking about a Ford?'

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to SwiftFlyer [2012-05-01 23:26:31 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. =3
Actually, Ford did make the Mustang aircraft. During World War II, one of their factories was set up to build aircraft and they built the P-51. In 1963, when they needed a name for their new sports car, they drew on the P-51's name because most people were familiar with the P-51's military career and its high performance, thus Ford took the Mustang name and applied it to their car.

But yeah, my choice of Mustang is like yours. Even the '68 Boss Mustang with the 429 can't compete with the '45 Mustang with the 1650. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SwiftFlyer In reply to Russian-Fox [2012-05-01 23:30:16 +0000 UTC]

All of the auto manufacturers helped and built aircraft or components. I did not know that Ford built Mustangs. Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to SwiftFlyer [2012-05-01 23:34:45 +0000 UTC]

Indeed they did.
You know the Hemi engine from Chrysler, found in their muscle cars of the 60's and 70's? That actually originated in World War II, in a variant of the P-47 Thunderbolt. Appropriately enough, it was nicknamed the Hemibolt.
And sure thing. =3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SwiftFlyer In reply to Russian-Fox [2012-05-02 00:49:06 +0000 UTC]

That I knew about.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to SwiftFlyer [2012-05-02 04:41:58 +0000 UTC]

Ah. Got'cha.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

YellowSeven [2012-05-01 09:09:46 +0000 UTC]

Probably has the same 'nearly lost' story as the Mosquito in a sense the USAAF wasn't interested at first...was built for the RAF but the original engine and canopy setout wasn't to our liking as a fighter...nor ground attack, most were sent to Scotland for air defense there... but that RR engine and other refinements made really did make it a legend; if the spitfire was the Queen/ballerina, then the mustang was that cadilac C:

Interesting paint scheme, reminds me of the post war Royal Navy FAA scheme.

Good job C:

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to YellowSeven [2012-05-01 23:32:16 +0000 UTC]

Indeed.
History is full of these "nearly lost" stories. To this day, many people insist that the Mustang's origin never laid in Germany, even though the designer, Edgar Schmued himself said otherwise.

Thanks. And I thought the exact same thing about it. Its a real Mustang color scheme, though slightly modified. According to the book I got it from, the scheme is from the 361st Fighter Group, 8th Air Force, based at Bottisham, Cambridgeshire, UK in 1944.
The last pic in the More Pics section shows the page from book where I got the inspiration from.

Thanks. =3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

enc86 [2012-05-01 05:27:42 +0000 UTC]

looks great man! awesome paint job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Russian-Fox In reply to enc86 [2012-05-01 05:30:09 +0000 UTC]

Much thanks. =3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

enc86 In reply to Russian-Fox [2012-05-01 05:32:44 +0000 UTC]

your welcome man

👍: 0 ⏩: 0