HOME | DD

RvBOMally — Hope and Change

Published: 2018-04-12 01:06:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 27513; Favourites: 145; Downloads: 236
Redirect to original
Description A neoliberal dystopia I worked with @The-Artist-64  on. He did most of the work, I just made the map and added a few bits to the text. 

2008. Congress was mired in political deadlock, the United States dollar was worth about as much as toilet paper, and the military was sinking in the quagmire of Iraq. The unemployed masses, the workers' unions, and trouble youth, the ignored turned their frustration toward the callousness of Wall Street. It seemed as if all hope was lost...and then, he came. The progressive, charming statesman, the champion of the American people, the Roosevelt[1] of his time: Barack Hussein Obama.

The reforms came at full speed, backed by a solidly Democratic congress. American forces largely departed from Iraq and Afghanistan, allowing for billions of dollars to be spent on the installation of universal health care, a pivot toward clean energy, the restoration of 500 acres of tribal homelands, and the establishment of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The pinnacle of the second term came in 2014 with the foundation of the North American Union, a common market eliminating the borders between Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Then, World War III hit.

It started in the South China Sea, then spread to Ukraine, and engulfed the already chaotic Middle East. Russia and China joined forces against America, the former seizing vast swaths of land in Europe. The EU mobilized, quickly forming an integrated military structure to combat the invaders. After one year, the New Axis had been defeated by a united front of allied powers.

Heeding the words of Joe Biden, governments are now held accountable by the international community, and the world has a say in every nation's affairs. This is a necessity, "to prevent another Crimea from happening". As supranational unions have been said to be the first step in eliminating borders, the world's policemen are determined to install a world government to unite the global village at last. The vehicle for this integration comes in the form of the One World Community, headquartered in the International City of San Francisco. While the Community is a multilateral organization, the NAU and EU provide political leadership to the globe, while deep green Brazil and India fill in as the other two superpowers on the Security Council. 

World War III did several good things for the Democrats. The conditions of the war were such that the women and minorities had to take up the occupations held by the young white men off fighting in Eurasia. That disproportionate amounts of these young men died overseas made the survivors a minority, and left these groups with substantial power. Far right extremist movements, both real and imagined, continue to assert that these men were fighting for the wrong side. Already entrenched in the economy during the Depression, the government also seized unprecedented power over Wall Street during WWIII. Those corporations that didn't survive were gobbled up by government-sponsored ones, like Disney and Comcast, which became monopolies. The new global economy is oddly state capitalist; highly regulated, yet matched with a very "buy! buy! buy!" attitude. The line between these megacorporations and the government are now incredibly blurry. Even the 2nd Amendment has been revoked in an unofficial capacity. Indeed, the founding documents of the U.S. have been superseded by the directives of the One World Community. Whether or not further legislation will be undone remains to be seen.

The NAU has integrated most of Latin America, and it is an open question whether the NAU will remain dominated by the former United States or if its Latin American portions will form a cohesive political bloc enough so that they will dominate NAU politics. So far, the influx of Latin American (and Canadian) voters has shifted American politics much further to the left, to the point that the old Democrats seem like conservatives by comparison. Of course, Democratic political hegemony is maintained by a nigh-impenetrable system of corporate, governmental, and media network, but their hegemony is still reliant on a left-wing political narrative. The establishment may have successfully neutralized the political right as a terroristic force, but if a cohesive movement can attack the Democrats from the left.... 

The EU is further along on the road to political integration, and if it weren't for the NAU's clear leadership of the world, it would form the core of the One World Community. The EU is a fully federalized state, with national governments appointed directly by Eurocrats from Brussels. Democracy hasn't been done away with, yet. Elections are frequently held, until Brussels gets the results it wants, and then they are sacrosanct and the will of the people. Censorship, reliant on the ever-present threat of the far right or resurgent Russian nationalism, is ever-present, with police spending more of their efforts on enforcing speech laws than they do crimes such as murder or robbery. 

The broken Russian Federation is under the control of a gaggle of pliant, Western-educated oligarchs, just as brutal and corrupt as their predecessors but with the decency to hide this activity. Russian nationalism is an ever-present threat, with many Russians refusing to accept the destruction of their country. Many groups have risen to try and reunite Russia, but apart from the brutal Russian Liberation Army, none of them are united enough themselves to actually fight EU and NAU occupation. The constant barrages by drones do not help. 

Remilitarized Japan is among Washington's closest allies in post-war East Asia. The Third Sino-Japanese War was just a few naval battles in the Pacific, allowing an attitude that Tokyo is "unbeatable" to prevail. Nationalists are gaining traction with the government, particularly with claims that the OWC is subverting the Japanese economy to prevent its rise once again...claims that aren't far from the truth.

China is under a weak, "liberal" government, which is always on the precipice of collapse. Many areas of the countryside are under the de facto control of warlords, some dating back to the Third World War. Although the Chinese middle classes initially welcomed the fall of the Communist Party, it sees the new government as a weak puppet of Western interests which is not only not advancing Chinese interests, but is making the country go backwards. A new generation of nationalists hope to reverse this second era of humiliation, and they are growing more powerful by the day. 

Africa, too, is being united under OWC guidance. South Africa is the model, the Republic having conquered Apartheid and now taking its multi-cultural inclusive ways north...nevermind the ever-louder voices calling for white genocide.

The UN International Zones, areas managed by the Security Council, are effectively modern day colonies. These include much of the Amazon (now an ecological preserve), some bits and pieces of the Middle East, Kashmir, and parts of China.

Only a few areas are outside of the OWC's control. The Islamic State resembles Taliban-ruled Afghanistan in some aspects, and a Mad Max film in others. The Islamic State only makes money through the sale of oil, although no government would admit to buying crude from jihadis. The Greater Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the world's last hope of resistance against the OWC, continues to cross red lines with impunity. Currently backing everyone and anyone who hates the central banks, and stable only because its huge Chinese refugee population is practically enslaved by the theocratic philosophy of Death Worship. Their fun collection of sci-fi tier WMDs would make invasion...unpleasant.

[1] Which one? Both of them.
Related content
Comments: 57

LJB92 [2023-12-14 15:57:18 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

David-2Determined [2021-08-09 03:27:59 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HuntingMonsterssssss [2020-06-02 15:44:00 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

SinaDelendaEst [2019-11-19 00:39:03 +0000 UTC]

What a beautiful world, I can't see how this is a dystopia.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

AlexanderAbelard [2018-04-19 18:13:43 +0000 UTC]

This is ingeniously stupid.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

cthulhufhtagn1987 [2018-04-19 11:41:25 +0000 UTC]

While there are a few rather nasty things here,I'm not sure if this scenario can be really called that dystopic, I've seen much worse by this author and others, at any rate. 

👍: 3 ⏩: 0

OneHellofaBird [2018-04-13 21:31:13 +0000 UTC]

heh, shouldn’t it be “Land of Hope and Change” like the British song?

and for full neoliberal dystopia, just double down Obama’s biggest boners and add water—$2T to the bankers who sold slipshod mortgages, twice as many broke homeowners used to “foam the runway,” twice the new prisons, twice the jobs offshored, double the insurance mandate, no Dodd-Frank, no Social Security, no #MeToo , medical as well as student debt undischargeable, twice the Dems beholden to payday lenders, a credit-card bubble as bad as the ones with housing and then car mortgages, twice the meth/opioids, a 3M-square foot PRISM center in Utah, twice the whistleblowers crushed, twice the Lillie Hardens

that setup’d be harder to keep from going all 90s Russia—professors selling tchotchkes in the snow, ambulances taking 6 hours to arrive since the comparative advantage is in taxi service, playgrounds obliterated for their scrap metal

oy, and a Hitchensite Kurdistan ...

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

AbleArcher1928 In reply to OneHellofaBird [2018-04-16 22:31:15 +0000 UTC]

Regarding Hitchens, you may appreciate this article.

www.salon.com/2011/12/20/hitch…

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

OneHellofaBird In reply to AbleArcher1928 [2018-04-17 19:21:40 +0000 UTC]

Hitchens definitely saw himself as a new Orwell--a torchbearer of conscience, distributor of unpopular but necessary realities that literally everyone else is covering up or excusing; so he favored the Kurds because he projected the image of a secular socialist republic onto them; so of course there'd be violent laicists and anticlericalists pouring in

but in the end he was misapplying Orwell, like the 60s liberal Vietnam hawks and 80s Democrats running around in "I'm a Contra too" shirts--they weren't fighting a totalitarian empire, they were embodying it; unlike the lonesome Orwell Hitchens was a gladhander and media darling; he had none of that counterbalancing pessimistic streak that made Orwell aware things could go badly wrong: Hitchens still has the Trotskyite legacy that "if you simply fill enough graves, then utopia will arrive"

Orwell would never have foamed about how he wished bigger ammo was used so that no opponent could brag about being saved by the thickness of the holy book over their heart: Orwell was a revolutionary tourist but he’d see the Nationalist conscripts face-to-face

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RtasVader [2018-04-13 10:00:41 +0000 UTC]

Of all of your worlds this one is perhaps the most blisteringly hopeless.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zomg420 [2018-04-13 06:12:27 +0000 UTC]

Come on now, this is the SECOND time you make me root for North Korea of all places.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BagelBagelBagel [2018-04-13 04:53:06 +0000 UTC]

Love how you "gilded" this one by making it seem like a mostly peaceful and prosperous world, but with deep setted issues at a closer glance. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

ptwolv022 In reply to BagelBagelBagel [2018-04-17 03:50:47 +0000 UTC]

Just like the Neocon world born from 9/11 on steroids.
The "Neo-" ideologies are just the greed of yesteryear covered by a modern ideology. As such, you end up with a modern Gilded Age. Lots of forward progress on the surface, but in the end? Greed and corruption underlie the golden veneer and it shows when you go beneath the surface.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

360killerelite23 In reply to BagelBagelBagel [2018-04-13 13:06:26 +0000 UTC]

Kinda like his neocon world

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Artist-64 In reply to 360killerelite23 [2018-04-23 04:13:29 +0000 UTC]

I made these two with the thought that they would be read together. The parallels are intentional.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

KuboCaskett [2018-04-12 19:52:50 +0000 UTC]

With current US-Russian relations going downhill, I have a feeling a similar war might happen IOTL; though hopefully it wouldn't go nuclear, not sure if China will join in.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jaywell96 In reply to KuboCaskett [2022-12-04 13:08:05 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DraketheNintendofan [2018-04-12 19:34:40 +0000 UTC]

Alex Jones sweats nervously.

Also, how's the monarchy of Britain/England doing in this timeline? Are they still the official monarchy of Britain or did they get exiled in Oceania?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RvBOMally In reply to DraketheNintendofan [2018-04-12 20:01:51 +0000 UTC]

Still around. Still powerless.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MartyrFan [2018-04-12 18:36:39 +0000 UTC]

And here's the neoliberal dystopia. Do you know what would be really interesting? An interuniversal war between this universe's One World Community and your neoconservative dystopia's Global Freedom Coalition.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Artist-64 In reply to MartyrFan [2018-04-23 04:14:24 +0000 UTC]

The tech isn't there. They would just try and screw each other over for a quick buck.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MartyrFan In reply to The-Artist-64 [2018-04-25 03:15:21 +0000 UTC]

Hmm. I can only imagine what they would think of each other and how attempted debates would go. I wonder what they would think of us?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Artist-64 In reply to MartyrFan [2018-04-26 02:15:00 +0000 UTC]

"A lost, divided nation of hedonists and extremists, failing to use its power for good on the global stage" and "a deplorable, corrupt country not doing enough for oppressed peoples at home or abroad", respectively. Polarization, a lack of unity, and few accomplishments toward their agendas would likely disappoint the two.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SirKokosnuss [2018-04-12 15:01:08 +0000 UTC]

very realistic future world, n1!
except maybe for russia

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

grisador [2018-04-12 14:30:10 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful ! You know that its a gem; when RvBOmally mades an alternate history scenerio that's close to a decent world

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AbleArcher1928 [2018-04-12 14:03:18 +0000 UTC]

Most amusing! What are Iran and Saudi Arabia like in this TL? I imagine that Obama and Clinton have infiltrated these states with hipster sleeper cells who are ready and willing to act upon the first transmission of social media message (apparently OTL HRC honestly believed that one could build a new Libya through the interest, the so-called "e-Libya" initiative! Try using that to build civil society with a bunch of rowdy tribesmen and paramilitary groups running amok!).

Also, whatever became of Trump and Cruz in this TL? Perhaps Trump ended up in the International Criminal Court for making "deals" with dictators like Gaddafi (He was actually planning to build a resort there OTL and in an audio interview with FOX News criticized the Obama administration for overthrowing an ally in the War on Terror!)

I was expect that the "centrist world" would follow 1990s themes though I suppose that ottovonsuds' Al Gore's World covers this pretty well.

I don't know if you and TheArtist64 are still doing a realist world. If so, I can help by providing some good background information. I was thinking that the point of divergence is that Watergate is successful and the Nixon-Kissinger realists never lose their glitter to the liberal and neoconservative (or Reaganite) moralists, especially since they are able to maintain South Vietnamese sovereignty with the threat of actually enforcing the provisions of the 1972 Peace Treaty.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RvBOMally In reply to AbleArcher1928 [2018-04-13 01:23:50 +0000 UTC]

The next one will actually be your centrist world come to life. That and the realist world.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AbleArcher1928 In reply to RvBOMally [2018-04-13 20:09:56 +0000 UTC]

I see. So far, I find your collaborative projects quite engaging.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dresdenfiles10 [2018-04-12 13:36:17 +0000 UTC]

"The conditions of the war were such that the women and minorities had to take up the occupations held by the young white men off fighting in Eurasia. That disproportionate amounts of these young men died overseas made the survivors a minority, and left these groups with substantial power."

Something like 40-45% of the armed forces is non-white. That seems a bit unrealistic that that's the reason these groups get more power

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jeckl [2018-04-12 06:00:00 +0000 UTC]

So what is happening with the oceaina union?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PachPachis [2018-04-12 04:11:38 +0000 UTC]

> year 2052

> be citizen of Unión Neoliberal Norteamericana

> work as robot cleaner at Lehman-Sachs-Comcast

> get paid $4 an hour but receive $16,000 per month in refundable EITC

> put money into legalized MDMA penny stock

> beat market by 3%

> get arrested at 3 AM by the FAMA Police for insider trading because I violated the EMH

> sentenced to 2 days in Gary Becker Resort for Citizens with Misaligned Preferences

> fuckfuckfuck.mp4

> cellmate is hardened criminal

> 6 consecutive life sentences for public sector union organizing and refusing to buy health insurance

> spends all day saying crazy shit like "inflation is theft" and "incomes have been stagnant for 70 years"

> resist his brainwashing and report him to the Executive Vice President of Utility Realignment

> come out reformed like the corporate tax code

> take money out of illegal EMH violating stock and put it into Bank of McApplesoft

> under-perform market by 1.6%

> receive Joseph Stiglitz Information Asymmetry Refundable Tax Credit

> donate money to Parti Libéral Démocrate so they can hit their 85% popular vote target

> come home to loving same-sex racially-mixed partner

> watch CNNYT on AmazFlix

> go to bed content knowing I'm a Pareto improvement

> thanksMichelle.jpg


Edit: also, shouldn't the country-sized dump be a UN international zone?
also also, the footnote for tibet refers to "IU" peacekeepers, but it should be South Asian Fed., I think?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EASTFverse In reply to PachPachis [2024-04-08 14:39:02 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wabash56 [2018-04-12 03:40:59 +0000 UTC]

how did nk avoid destruction in wwiii?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jaywell96 In reply to wabash56 [2022-12-04 13:10:57 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

chaotic-nipple [2018-04-12 03:40:02 +0000 UTC]

... Are you feeling OK? This hardly seems dystopic at all, compared to your usual work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

ThePrussianRussian In reply to chaotic-nipple [2018-04-12 05:10:35 +0000 UTC]

He does those sometimes. The '2040 projection' he made was just his rather cheerful prediction of how things will go later on. There's also a similar Neocon map he released earlier.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RebelOfGod In reply to chaotic-nipple [2018-04-12 04:37:10 +0000 UTC]

If you think that this world is a utopia, then I suggest you to visit a doctor. This one is no where near a utopia.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PachPachis In reply to RebelOfGod [2018-04-12 04:50:37 +0000 UTC]

Where did they say it was a utopia? All they said was it wasn't as dystopic as usual.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RebelOfGod In reply to PachPachis [2018-04-12 12:39:12 +0000 UTC]

Well sorry for not getting the joke then.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sirion101 [2018-04-12 03:09:21 +0000 UTC]

Ho boy, how was the EU integration of Switzerland?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KuboCaskett [2018-04-12 02:28:48 +0000 UTC]

Funny, I had this idea of a WWIII that unites the world afterwards, albeit it happened in the late 40's; the reason I chose that is to have the world plenty of time to have the world federation stabilize itself by the time the 21st century arrived.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Beastboss [2018-04-12 01:38:13 +0000 UTC]

I thought you died lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RvBOMally In reply to Beastboss [2018-04-12 01:40:10 +0000 UTC]

Not yet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Beastboss In reply to RvBOMally [2018-04-12 06:59:00 +0000 UTC]

Something interesting I noticed though is that in both scenarios you see a "greater Israel", kind of interesting

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BadgingBadger [2018-04-12 01:20:00 +0000 UTC]

...I really hope the /pol/tards don't use this map as propaganda.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Artist-64 In reply to BadgingBadger [2018-04-12 01:24:12 +0000 UTC]

I hope my /Pol/ack overlords are pleased with my work. My many moons of time spent lurking there had a definite impact on this piece.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BadgingBadger In reply to The-Artist-64 [2018-04-12 01:26:47 +0000 UTC]

I understand.
...I really hope the /pol/tards don't use this map as propaganda.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Void-Wolf [2018-04-12 01:15:27 +0000 UTC]

Well, ain't this a pretty pictrue? Not that bad all things considered. Though now I'm wondering how a libretarian dystopia would be any different.

Or would it be a detailed map of citystates trying to outdo one another?

👍: 1 ⏩: 2

OneHellofaBird In reply to Void-Wolf [2018-04-12 23:22:01 +0000 UTC]

interesting about the libertarian/AnCap/neolib connection, because they're all branches of the same 19th-century tree: all of them basically cross the heat boundary from "the state should be minimal within the economy" to "what 'public good'?"

basically it's the step from the Atari Democrats from "sure you plebs have just discovered that we secretly plan to dissolve the Post Office and sell the system half-price to Richard C. Blum and Jeff Bezos--but at least we don't say that gay people cause hurricanes!"

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Void-Wolf In reply to OneHellofaBird [2018-04-13 03:29:50 +0000 UTC]

I wonder what may come next.?

👍: 1 ⏩: 0


| Next =>