Comments: 25
Matt-T-Rex [2016-03-25 18:55:48 +0000 UTC]
Well, there goes my theory of T-Rex as a native species of North America. ^_^'
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Saberrex In reply to Matt-T-Rex [2016-03-26 03:29:35 +0000 UTC]
Yup. evidence points to it being an asian immigrant.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tyraxxus [2016-03-11 22:10:38 +0000 UTC]
While this idea seems cool and all, I actually believe that a population of Tarbosaurus may have decided to migrate through the Bering land bridge from their homeland in central Asia to western North America, where from there they might have encountered and outcompeted the native tyrannosaurs, and then eventually evolved into Tyrannosaurus a few million years later.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Saberrex In reply to Tyraxxus [2016-03-11 22:52:18 +0000 UTC]
That's pretty much what I'm suggesting. Of course, I think the evolution of Tarbosaurus into T. rex would have happened a bit faster, maybe before they crossed the Bering land bridge.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PCAwesomeness [2016-03-11 14:19:59 +0000 UTC]
Amazing!
Also, on HodariNundu's sketch, I made a slightly more animal-themed version of one of Genghis Khan's quotes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bhut [2016-03-11 13:16:11 +0000 UTC]
I know; this makes as much sense as anything else.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Saberrex In reply to bhut [2016-03-11 15:19:13 +0000 UTC]
It does make a lot of sense.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
grisador [2016-03-11 11:31:49 +0000 UTC]
Great work !
But the T Rex come to ' enlighten ' those lands with her\his strength; she\he shall enlighten the North America from primitive Rex'es !
(Although maybe albertosaurus were much more luckier at North and evolved to nanuqasaurus)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Saberrex In reply to grisador [2016-03-11 15:11:05 +0000 UTC]
There's one problem with that; Nanuqsaurus is not in the same family of Tyrannosaurids as Albertosaurus; it belongs to the family Tyrannosaurinae as opposed to Albertosaurinae, to which Gorgosaurus and Albertosaurus belong. Nanuqsaurus is most closely related to creatures like Lythronax, Tarbosaurus, Zhuchengtyrannus, and T. rex itself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grisador In reply to Saberrex [2016-03-16 11:49:35 +0000 UTC]
Oh; true !
Then saying Nanuqsaurus is another invader or descendant from another invader; isn't speculative after all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Saberrex In reply to grisador [2016-03-16 14:38:39 +0000 UTC]
Probably more the descendant of another tyrannosaurine from Asia that stayed up in the north or an Asia-bound tyrannosaurine that carved out a niche in Alaska and never left. Small size takes many, many generations to evolve.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grisador In reply to Saberrex [2016-03-16 23:09:42 +0000 UTC]
True; the ancestor of the Nanuq might be there for a very long time
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NordicB3rry [2016-03-11 10:58:49 +0000 UTC]
Fricking amwrsome !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
asari13 [2016-03-11 10:48:50 +0000 UTC]
fresco
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Saberrex In reply to asari13 [2016-03-14 22:15:10 +0000 UTC]
When you say fresco, what do you mean by that? (I'm very literal. Also, as far as I'm aware, my sketch doesnt look like a fresco)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
asari13 In reply to Saberrex [2016-03-15 15:26:55 +0000 UTC]
cool
sorry
👍: 0 ⏩: 1