HOME | DD
SameerPrehistorica — Animals Chart
#animals #birds #chart #comparison #dinosaurs #fish #mammals #reptiles #size
Published: 2013-03-26 08:25:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 53990; Favourites: 385; Downloads: 855
Redirect to original
Description
Possibly will be updated..Related content
Comments: 137
i have been looking all over for something like this. glad i found this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
It's behind Arctotherium.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Add palaeoloxodon namadicus, I wanna see how the biggest elephant ever stacks up with the dinosaurs
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Everything other than Hydrodamalis is a carnivore.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Yes,that seems quite funny and weird.Previously i had the baleen whales in grey color in the old image.They are gentle giants however they eat small animals and i was having confusions to call them as Predators.In one site,it was mentioned as the filter feeders are micro predators.Well, micro or macro,they do swallow tiny animals,so putting them as red is the correct thing and i did.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
There are two styles of filter feeding-passive, making those animals (basking sharks, gray whales, etc) carnivores but not predators, and active (blue whale, whale shark, etc) making them active predators (but not raptorial active predators)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hmm...Still some people can get confuse with the difference between the names 'Carnivores' and 'Predators'.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Unless you could add Desmostylus and Paleoparadoxia, they were herbivores like the Steller's sea cow.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Isn't the Spinosaurus somewhat too massive. I don't refer to the shorter legs (though I think too they should be slightly shorter) but the torso should be shallower from what I've seen.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
you know that sauroposeidon was a titanosaur not a brachiosaur right. it has been placed in the somphospondylan group of titanosaurs
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I noted that but in all the images and videos i have seen,it looks either like a Brachiosaur or Giraffatitan.So i had to follow that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fc02.deviantart.net/fs71/i/201…
here is a more accurate pic (palxysaurus is now a young sauroposeidon)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
And a manta ray and an ocean sunfish?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Just a quick question, will you ever add diplodocus altus(amphicoelias)?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Please make a wide assortment of extinct primates from the Miocene on this huge diagram. If I could possibly tell you how many species of primates were converging during the Miocene, I would be some sort of genius. Some of them I want you to add are Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Paranthropus robustus, Ardipithicus, Australopithecus, Homo Habilis, Homo ergaster, Homo antecessor, homo neanderthalensis, homo heidelbergensis, homo rhodeisensis, and Darwinius on this diagram, that's all I know. But I'll just suggest that you should put a lot of extinct primates on here. And please add the extinct Agriotherium, Toxodon, Glyptodon, and Titanichthys to this chart, oh, and perhaps you should add more Permian synapsids, temnospondyls, therapsids, Rodents, sirenians, monotremes, most surely more extinct three-toed horses, entelodonts, nimravids, more extinct Giraffes like Sivatherium and Bramatherium, more extinct cetaceans like Cetotherium and prehistoric Seals like Acrophoca and Miocene and Eocene proboscideans such as Eritreum melakeghebrekristosi.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nice update, but why Alamosaurus nad Puertasaurus are bigger than Argentinosaurus? I read that Alamosaurus was the same size, and Puertasaurus was estimated to be bigger at first, but more recent estimates say it was only 100 ft long. And an even more important thing to me, why Mapusaurus is 43 ft long like Giganotosaurus? The largest estimate I know is 40 ft.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Both Alamosaurus (Based on the 2011 Fowler & Sullivan vertebrae & femur) & Puertasaurus (Based on Paleo King's restoration) are probably around 120 feet, while Argentinosaurus was probably around 110 feet long.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
All those 3 are having a similar body size except Alamosaurus having a slight long neck and Puertasaurus neck is slightly longer than that as well as it's tail. The weight of Argentinosaurus was reduced before many days which you should be knowing. In that case,it's size should be smaller than seen in the chart.But still i am using that same size which is upto 100 tonnes. I don't believe in the accuracies of animals known from partial remains. Any one of those 3 animals could be bigger than the rest or all of them could be similar in size,who knows.There is not much evidence.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This is amazing work, thanks for going to all that effort!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ONE WORD. WONDERFUL
(oh,but were is Prionosuchus, a little hard to find something here )
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
There are lots of animals and you know that i can't add all of them,i forgot that one.Someday will update it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sameerprehistorica.deviantart.…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mapusaurus was that big? The largest estimation on the wikipedia is only 40 ft, so there is a new estimation for it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Curiously enough the Spinosaurus shows the new silhouette according to Ibrahim but with the not-too-short legs and the bipedal stance according to what Hartman suggests.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
As per the new reconstruction but slightly reduced it's neck/tail length, somewhat increased it's leg height and slightly increased it's body size.
www.nytimes.com/2014/09/12/sci…
sameerprehistorica.deviantart.…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You know, one of these days you've gotta make a Gigantopithecus Sameer, that would be awesome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Out of date. You need to add Pelagornis sandersi, largest flighted bird. I LOVE this chart btw. <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I will add it someday when i have free time..There are already some pending large animals.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This is a really good reference. I always try to find charts like this, but I never can. I'm not so good at visualizing height and such, so this is a great help.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What is that (26 - 30 ft long / 5 - 7 tonnes) subtitle between the name and silhouette of archelon?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hmm..lol.Thanks for telling me.I changed it.It's the length and weight for some other animal which was accidentally turned on by me.I have hidden some other length/weights of animals in this document which i have.In the beginning when i made this chart,i also added the weight,length,height and as the animals are getting more then there is not much space.So i decided only to mention the species names.However this chart will complete change to match the Megafauna image when it gets completed someday.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I don't think this is a problem, because we need more prehistoric animals.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>