Comments: 22
PhelanMahoney [2008-09-16 08:59:43 +0000 UTC]
Another well done picture. Ever think of doing a Triop? Hammerships are one of my three all time faves for potential vessels for heroes in SJ. Triop and Whaleships being the other two with Nautiloids and the neogi vessels behind it. And I hate to say it, I actually like the Spider Moon version of the Illithid dreadnought over the traditional. It just looks potentially nasties.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PhelanMahoney In reply to SilverbladeTE [2008-09-28 02:12:11 +0000 UTC]
They introduced some neat new ideas though. True the application of the ideas proved to be underdone but I have some ideas now of my own, kind of combining SpellJammer with PlaneScape sans Sigil. A less combustible phlo replaces the Astral and the spheres don't all look like the crystal balls they do in traditional SJ as some of them look entirely different.
A few of the new ships in Spider Moon were interesting. And I have to say the Dreadnought, if you adapt the schematics of the original to what Paizo did, you have a ship that will make some folks tremble in fear.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PhelanMahoney In reply to SilverbladeTE [2008-09-28 04:57:58 +0000 UTC]
Ugh! No 4e talk please! I'm holding at 3.5 and Paizo's Pathfinder RPG. Much closer to what I envision a ranger to be. Especially the one pirate character I created back in 2nd Ed. If you have access to Lords of Madness, there is a spell in there that Rangers can cast that I am very partial to. Of course my own ranger would prepare that spell if he knew he was going to encounter illithids, neogi and the like.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PhelanMahoney In reply to SilverbladeTE [2008-09-30 08:00:14 +0000 UTC]
When I was getting into 3E I may have sold my copy on e-bay. I got rid of my whole 2E books in a few lots. Although some of the books I'm beginning to regret doing that. Illithiad and Sea Devils being the primary two. Heck I still have this weird idea of making a psychic ranger class like the psychic warrior and lurk classes. The idea of beating the freaking mind flayers at their own game appeals to me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PhelanMahoney In reply to SilverbladeTE [2008-10-01 08:29:51 +0000 UTC]
Heh, why do you think the buggers at WotC kept them as intellectual property? They don't deserve it. If you want to get right down to it, Chaosium should have rights to the suckers and the H.P.Lovecraft estate. I mean who do they think they're trying to fool? Mind Flayers are just miniature versions of Cthulhu himself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PhelanMahoney In reply to SilverbladeTE [2008-10-01 17:59:14 +0000 UTC]
mind flayers and aboleth are the only two I would grumble about and would need to redo if I wanted to sell anything, which eventually I might. Never got Beholders really but I did see something like them in a Japanese fantasy cartoon once.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PhelanMahoney In reply to SilverbladeTE [2008-10-02 18:03:48 +0000 UTC]
They are both slave takers although mind flayers are less picky and generally do not alter their slaves except when they take a slave and make a new illithid out of him. Aboleth make their slaves skum at least they did. I'm not sure about how they did the mind flayers in Lords of Madness though. But this is partially because I actually liked how FFG used them in Dragonstar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PhelanMahoney In reply to SilverbladeTE [2008-10-04 07:03:22 +0000 UTC]
I just love a good story. Traditional fantasy, science fiction, a mixture of both, the escape is what is important to me. If a story or a game takes away from the crushing reality of the humdrum everyday world and lets you have a little bit of fun in a world or worlds of pure imagination then that's where I wanna be and go. Although I find science fantasy to be a lot of fun to think and write about.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PhelanMahoney In reply to SilverbladeTE [2008-10-07 07:09:04 +0000 UTC]
It's been years since I actually read any science fiction. Nothing really interests me and I have a slightly conceited belief that I write better stories than most anything I have read so far with certain authors excluded. R.A.Salvatore and Stephen King being two writers I find enjoyable no matter what. Although I have read some nice stuff from Clive Barker lately.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1