Comments: 98
Jimbowyrick1 [2020-02-11 23:01:23 +0000 UTC]
"Ohhh! WOW! I've got to learn to use the GIMP blur ...., thingy!" - PAV
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Small-Brown-Dog In reply to Jimbowyrick1 [2020-02-12 10:12:40 +0000 UTC]
I get a load of people saying I should use motion blur a lot more but to be honest I think its over used and unnatural in many applications I see but then thats just me perhaps.
Things like this image and the V1 thing I did make sense other wise its blur that sounds like you are saying "Meh" or throwing up as far as I'm concerned
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MultiverseInquisitor [2019-07-27 00:38:04 +0000 UTC]
He 111 is one of my favorite bombers, and this is a very interesting concept!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Small-Brown-Dog In reply to MultiverseInquisitor [2019-07-27 09:33:31 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, there is a lot of influences in there really but I needed to lean a bit towards the HE111 for my alt.universe
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cullyferg2010 [2019-03-01 21:50:01 +0000 UTC]
Coming back to his bird again, I thought of turning it into a Bristol Beaufort. She was good for interdiction work as well as night fighting and torpedo bombing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Small-Brown-Dog In reply to cullyferg2010 [2019-03-01 21:51:10 +0000 UTC]
I think you are thinking of the Beaufighter - the one after the Beaufort.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dediego23 [2018-12-30 12:38:25 +0000 UTC]
What's her main armaments?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cullyferg2010 [2018-10-16 01:37:57 +0000 UTC]
When I came across this image again, I immediately saw the Douglas A-20 Havoc as a similar design for a fast attack aircraft.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Small-Brown-Dog In reply to cullyferg2010 [2018-10-16 09:08:47 +0000 UTC]
Similar roles I guess but I can't see an A20.
I'm currently working on that website I have been threatening where I can tie some of this tech together (will need to revist some of my stories though)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cullyferg2010 In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2018-10-17 01:40:47 +0000 UTC]
After writing to about that Douglas, I sat down an rethought what the American response would be. Taking this image as a template, redo the aircraft into the North American B-25 Mitchell in its 30 seconds over Tokyo. Think it would be a better fit.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Small-Brown-Dog In reply to cullyferg2010 [2018-10-17 08:46:31 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I can see that.
Had a run on old ww2 movies about 6 months or so ago and saw that again for the first time in ages
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cullyferg2010 In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2018-10-18 01:35:36 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, 'Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo'. Just as good as 'The Dam Busters'.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Small-Brown-Dog In reply to cullyferg2010 [2018-10-19 08:36:24 +0000 UTC]
I was thinking about this last night actually and to be honest I hink my favourite US airforce movie is 12 O'clock high.
Minimal flying in it but its a good drama and I like Pecks performance.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cullyferg2010 In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2018-10-20 01:46:33 +0000 UTC]
Very good movie. When they came out with the TV series, they used a lot of the original film footage taken during the war that had been used in the film.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cullyferg2010 In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2018-10-21 00:35:00 +0000 UTC]
When Robert Stack played the general that Gregory Peck played in the movie, it was alright. But after the third season and Stack wanted out, his co-pilot took over the squadron, but the writing seemed to have gone down hill a bit.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AcesInAction [2018-07-21 18:59:16 +0000 UTC]
Nice work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cullyferg2010 [2018-06-26 01:37:11 +0000 UTC]
Love this bird!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cullyferg2010 In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2018-06-26 20:04:52 +0000 UTC]
Love the design of this beast. Didn't the Condor Legion use the JU85 in Spain? I thought I once had seen a photo of the bird. It had a flight deck and nose as in the Boeing B-17.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Small-Brown-Dog In reply to cullyferg2010 [2018-06-26 20:43:41 +0000 UTC]
To be honest I'm not sure.
It was a twin tailed multi role job which I didn't think it got past a prototype owing to the 88 being the main man so to speak.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cullyferg2010 In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2018-06-27 01:31:18 +0000 UTC]
I do recall a bomber the Germans had been using before the 88 came on the scene. It was twin-engine and had what was called an 'ash-can' gunner's position under the aircraft.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cullyferg2010 In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2018-06-28 01:33:27 +0000 UTC]
Probably have to look that one up, but does sound vaguely familiar. Vaguely, mind you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SergeantPanther [2018-06-15 22:31:12 +0000 UTC]
I‘m kind of missing a bit of control surfaces here. Ailerons seem to be practically non existent from what I can see.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
SergeantPanther In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2018-06-16 16:21:19 +0000 UTC]
Kay, nice idea.
When I first saw this piece I thought it was a weird version of the Arado 234 because of the way the Cockpit/Windows looked but now I think the front looks more like a beefed up He 111.
Cool stuff.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Small-Brown-Dog In reply to SergeantPanther [2018-06-16 16:24:17 +0000 UTC]
Thank you.
I have a thing for vintage aviation and fantasy so with nearly all the warbirds having been done by others over the years I mixed the two and come up with my own based upon actual history other than this alternative tech.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
arfgard [2018-05-25 23:24:46 +0000 UTC]
Depiction of the famous "machenklein raid" of early WW2 ??
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Small-Brown-Dog In reply to arfgard [2018-05-26 08:33:42 +0000 UTC]
That went over my head I'm afraid
.... there could be a joke there
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
arfgard In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2018-05-26 14:07:36 +0000 UTC]
Pic just reminded me of a poster of the "Dolittle raid" (using B-25's, mfg. North American aircraft corp.) over Tokyo in April 1942 ("early" for Americans) and trying to think of an equivalent German name. Rather like the 1940 (?) Farey 'Swordfish' raid on the Taranto base in English lore, I'm guessing ; both utter masterpieces of improvisation !! Basis of the book "30 seconds over Tokyo"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jmb200960 [2018-05-21 12:55:24 +0000 UTC]
Great concept, story and picture.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
yereverluvinuncleber [2018-05-18 16:58:05 +0000 UTC]
Thoroughly good. It takes you a while to get these out.
Question: Who is the Chancellor in the timeline? Could it be Alois Schicklegruber? Could it be Ernst Roehm? It doesn't have to be the usual corporal.
Thought: The V1 is a logical choice for an earlier development in your timeline of this weapon but instead using lift generators of the type shown above. It would have certainly propelled this technology to power cruise weaponry of an earlier type similar to the Vergeltungswaffen Ein. A single jumo of the type shown, with the propeller as an early version of the V1, with a warhead at the rear? or as a pusher with the warhead at the front? It would be slower than the pulsejet having to provide lift and thrust (250-300mph?) but easier to produce in far greater numbers and ready for widescale use in '43?
A thought for you to mull over.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yereverluvinuncleber In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2018-05-18 19:36:31 +0000 UTC]
We need some padding to the timeline. We can't have these jerry buggers winning the war. Hitler or similar is the reason they lost it. Alois, his brother is a good candidate, strangled Hitler at birth.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Anzac-A1 [2018-05-18 10:16:35 +0000 UTC]
Funny how Germany invented the Schnellbomber concept, but only the British Mosquito actually fulfilled it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Small-Brown-Dog In reply to Anzac-A1 [2018-06-30 11:38:36 +0000 UTC]
I read a similar thing in a Wiki but it was disingenuous as even though it mentioned the ME262 it didn't refer to it in the Stormvogel version.
However this pales into significance when the article totally ignores the worlds first operational jet bomber: Arado Ar-234. The Mosquito is a legend in any of its many roles and was very fast but not fast enough to take the Schnell Bomber crown.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Anzac-A1 In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2018-06-30 22:07:38 +0000 UTC]
Yes, but you have to look at everything. The 234 had only 1 crew, who had to fly the plane and be the bombardier. That. combined with its speed would've required an exceptionally skilled pilot to bomb effectively. And while it was fast, if the war had gone on a few months linger, it would've faced RAF Vampires, which could easily match its speed. In any case, the 234 has too small a bombload to be effective, as its speed would've prevented any precision bombing, given the single crew member.
I imagine the reason the article ignores the 234 is that, operationally, it was almost never used as a bomber. It mainly served as a recon aircraft. Makes no sense to include an aircraft designed for the role, but that basically never served in said role.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Small-Brown-Dog In reply to Anzac-A1 [2018-06-30 23:25:47 +0000 UTC]
... and if the war had carried on the Vampire may well have had to face any number of luft46 style fighters and so and so fourth but that is all academic.
I imagine the reason the article ignores the AR234 is because its a wiki and you don't rely on wikis for objective facts. It was remiss of the author not to mention two faster German bombers one of which was developed as a Schnellbomber and not converted as per the Sturmvogel.
The Mosquito was an effective and superior weapon in all its roles but as a "quick bomber" it was slower than the AR234.
Makes no sense to include an aircraft designed for the role, but that basically never served in said role.
You don't think it makes sense to include even a quick reference to another schenellbomber in a schnellbomber article ?
That would be a bit like leaving out the Italian designs in the 1931 Schneider race because they didn't compete. Its not possible to get a thorough understanding historical fact if the facts are cherry picked to make an authors point or because the author alone thinks them not worthy.
Your argument is good and the facts would be an ideal counter to the mention of the AR234 but it wasn't mentioned and it should have been.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>