HOME | DD

snowunmasked — Restricted.

Published: 2007-06-03 15:57:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 2069; Favourites: 49; Downloads: 75
Redirect to original
Description Cyberport.

Nothing amazing.
Just thought the colours were pretty.






Thanks for looking :)

Related content
Comments: 101

snowunmasked In reply to ??? [2012-05-24 19:45:03 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ysmth In reply to snowunmasked [2012-05-24 20:49:39 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nicoleef [2008-06-29 19:11:03 +0000 UTC]

I like it, love the shadows and the light fading into dark

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

chilipalmer [2008-05-04 19:53:45 +0000 UTC]

Awesome use of natural light. I like how the colors glow

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to chilipalmer [2008-05-04 23:53:21 +0000 UTC]

Why thank you very much

I didn't think it would turn out this way, was lucky enough to be there during that particular time of day.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chilipalmer In reply to snowunmasked [2008-05-05 02:31:53 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Surround [2008-04-25 21:00:26 +0000 UTC]

the features of are the best

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to Surround [2008-04-27 05:09:01 +0000 UTC]

As are =chakrabird 's

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Surround In reply to snowunmasked [2008-04-27 09:26:55 +0000 UTC]

wow.. indeed

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

33xiT [2008-04-25 20:54:43 +0000 UTC]

Featured
Congratulations.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to 33xiT [2008-04-27 05:12:00 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rodenwald [2007-11-22 18:40:40 +0000 UTC]

very nice and warm colours, i like that!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to Rodenwald [2007-11-24 11:30:52 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. It's a pretty boring place though

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ktbatie [2007-08-27 16:32:41 +0000 UTC]

inside.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Schieben [2007-08-03 17:36:03 +0000 UTC]

yup yup!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to Schieben [2007-08-04 00:26:55 +0000 UTC]

Eh?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Schieben In reply to snowunmasked [2007-08-04 02:41:42 +0000 UTC]

"Cyberport.
Nothing amazing.
Just thought the colours were pretty."

yup yup!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

moon-girl [2007-06-18 18:27:59 +0000 UTC]

I think it is very lovely you have a great eye for pictuers ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DoB9889 [2007-06-16 02:03:12 +0000 UTC]

dude your art totally makes my eyes orgasm its just you bring this third sense to photography that I have never seen before much love girl this rocks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

iamymai [2007-06-14 21:18:25 +0000 UTC]

perfect how it's the primary colors. the deep shadows rock.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

appleken [2007-06-12 17:20:07 +0000 UTC]

The amazing element is the red looks a bit Orange to me (hope I am not colour blind)..probably because of the sunlight, and the wall looks like Navy Blue or Gray, two colours create high contrast. And due to the sunlight, the wooden colour on the upper left cause the reflection from it. So, they are hot, cool, and warm. Good picture. A good way to demonstrate the relationship of colours. The composition of lines and curves is simple enough to let the viewers feel very comfortable, and not mess.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

keonivex [2007-06-08 11:33:59 +0000 UTC]

hehe idk why but the colors and how the bricks are laid out, it makes me think of legos ah so much fun i had with them when i was a kid.. now they so tiny .-.; i wonder where the stairs go to?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to keonivex [2007-06-09 02:58:11 +0000 UTC]

I don't know where the stairs go to :)

But yeah I love Legos too. I have Star Wars legos displayed in my room.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

keonivex In reply to snowunmasked [2007-06-09 12:53:55 +0000 UTC]

hehe lego lela, or lego darthmall? o.o

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

saige [2007-06-06 05:21:17 +0000 UTC]

You're right, the colours are pretty.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to saige [2007-06-06 06:03:51 +0000 UTC]

Thanks :)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cyberoidx [2007-06-05 12:46:49 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to cyberoidx [2007-06-05 18:45:51 +0000 UTC]

I have the perfect site for you :) Check out dpreview.com , an excellent site with indepth reviews and cross-comparison with other camera models.

ISO, same with shutter-speed and aperture, has to do with controlling the amount of light emitted from the lens to the sensor on your camera. ISO is probably the easiest way to crank up the brightness of your photo, without having to risk the two other factors (shutter-speed and aperture). Basically speaking, the higher number the ISO, the brighter your photo would turn out to be. Therefore, low ISO settings are used during daytime and/or bright lighting conditions. High ISO would be for low-light conditions, such as night-time photography. Then again, you can always alter your ISO level depending on what you're shooting. For example if you want to shoot long-exposure, ie. leaving your shutter open for a long period of time and thus allowing in a lot of of light (this is usually for making photos of trails of light moving around in the darkness, which I'm pretty sure you might have come across), then, you can probably lower your ISO to compensate for the low shutter-speed, otherwise your photo would be overexposed.

Basically, to put it very simply, ISO is the quickest way to change the brightness of your photo. The downside though is the higher the ISO, the noisier your photo would turn out to be.

The best way is to just play around. Shoot manual :) You'll learn far more from personal experience than you will ever from reading all this crap from someone who has a half-naked pixelated chick as an avatar on a duck-shit-green-themed site

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cyberoidx In reply to snowunmasked [2007-06-06 04:33:18 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to cyberoidx [2007-06-06 06:04:15 +0000 UTC]

That should be your f-stop range, sweety :) Which is your aperture.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cyberoidx In reply to snowunmasked [2007-06-06 06:46:30 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to cyberoidx [2007-06-07 02:44:12 +0000 UTC]

No problem dude.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

speedysparrow [2007-06-05 07:33:20 +0000 UTC]

indeed, nice colors
just a bit to dark to see them reaaly good

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to speedysparrow [2007-06-05 19:04:56 +0000 UTC]

Which is the whole point! MYSTIQUE

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fancyfairy [2007-06-04 23:18:02 +0000 UTC]

love the shadows and the colors

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to Fancyfairy [2007-06-05 01:16:10 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fancyfairy In reply to snowunmasked [2007-06-05 11:37:03 +0000 UTC]

welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thequantumwarrior [2007-06-04 08:21:12 +0000 UTC]

One your five is so awesome, two which lens did you use, three excellent shadow work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to thequantumwarrior [2007-06-04 10:00:58 +0000 UTC]

I use the 24-105mm L series EF lens. I pretty awesome lens, but I wish I had more macro capabilities, as well as a bigger F-stop. Mine's at f/4

And thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thequantumwarrior In reply to snowunmasked [2007-06-04 18:09:35 +0000 UTC]

You n know the 24-70mm L is a about the same price and its a f/2.8, the 100mm f/2.8 macro can focus at 1cm and marcos on a DSLR can focus to infinity

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to thequantumwarrior [2007-06-05 01:37:40 +0000 UTC]

Yeah :/ I do want a whole bunch of new lenses. I originally wanted the Canon 200mm f/4 macro, but I'm not too hot for that kind of aperture range :/

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thequantumwarrior In reply to snowunmasked [2007-06-05 01:50:13 +0000 UTC]

larger apertures result in faster shutter speeds... I though canon longest macro was 180mm?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to thequantumwarrior [2007-06-05 02:17:43 +0000 UTC]

Nah actually Canon's longest and best macro is the 200mm f/2.8, but it's hella expensive :/

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thequantumwarrior In reply to snowunmasked [2007-06-05 04:23:50 +0000 UTC]

Oh thats why it a Fd mount

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to thequantumwarrior [2007-06-05 04:49:00 +0000 UTC]

I'm still pissed that I can't find where to turn on the in-built IR function on my 5D. And aperture bracketing doesn't seem to work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

thequantumwarrior In reply to snowunmasked [2007-06-05 07:08:49 +0000 UTC]

That strange of the AEB not to work, were you thinking abut HDRI? WHat firmware update do you have? The IR function puzzles me too I heard that Canon DSLR have a glass over the sensor filters out IR light, because the chip is sensitive to that frequency..
[link]

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to thequantumwarrior [2007-06-05 19:07:48 +0000 UTC]

I finally got AEB to work.

But not the IR :/

I'm pretty sure there's an easier way to do it >_>

That and I have the latest firmware Thank you for bringing that up. Reminded me actually.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thequantumwarrior In reply to snowunmasked [2007-06-07 04:13:08 +0000 UTC]

Good to hear! You might want to ask the IR question in the photoforum on here, they can fix just about any problem...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

snowunmasked In reply to thequantumwarrior [2007-06-07 04:42:52 +0000 UTC]

I just did, although there's no photo forum, so far as I've looked. I posted it on the Art Scene forum.

Thanks for suggesting :)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thequantumwarrior In reply to snowunmasked [2007-06-07 05:03:16 +0000 UTC]

Bah, I was just in it, I a bit a regular in there try this link! ---> [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>