Comments: 50
sodacan In reply to MADstarter [2018-03-01 13:12:17 +0000 UTC]
So yeah, the nonnude experiment didn't work and Playboy is back to nudes. As for this little honey, she's not going anywhere!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TimPhillips [2017-09-08 16:28:52 +0000 UTC]
Now that's a perfect butt!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sodacan In reply to TimPhillips [2017-09-08 23:21:16 +0000 UTC]
It as a pleasure to render..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TimPhillips In reply to sodacan [2017-09-09 15:55:09 +0000 UTC]
You better believe that!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
steveabc [2017-02-09 04:30:03 +0000 UTC]
Love the bunny.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sodacan In reply to steveabc [2017-02-10 01:01:02 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! Who doesn't love a bunny, right? Well, maybe the wives/girlfriends of those that do....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
thormanoftunder [2016-10-06 18:46:47 +0000 UTC]
Nice bu... ponytail.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sodacan In reply to WickedPrince [2016-07-25 01:46:39 +0000 UTC]
Magazine readership is down in general so while I get trying to broaden your target market. Problem is, Playboy is such and iconic brand associated with sexuality, I just don't how possible it is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sodacan In reply to WickedPrince [2016-07-28 22:26:29 +0000 UTC]
Me either. Something tells me in time, no one will be marketing director....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WickedPrince In reply to sodacan [2016-07-31 13:24:27 +0000 UTC]
Maxim seems like it's doing well, and it's more or less the same theory without the nudity. Pretty girls not wearing much with news articles interspersed between. So one would assume that Playboy could keep going just the way they always had. So it leaves me curious about what's going on that they feel the need to make such a radical change.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sodacan In reply to WickedPrince [2016-08-04 04:09:10 +0000 UTC]
I think part of their problem was their demographic was aging too. I think that was part of the thinking. Going younger.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WickedPrince In reply to sodacan [2016-08-04 05:57:56 +0000 UTC]
I can't imagine that taking out the pretty girls would help them draw in a younger crowd. If anything what they needed to change would be the staff writers who needed to write articles that would interest a younger crowd.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sodacan In reply to WickedPrince [2016-08-04 21:22:47 +0000 UTC]
Still have the pretty girls, just with mostly clothed now... It was a realization that they couldn't compete with internet porn so better to clean up the image for more general market appeal. Its a worldwide brand with interest in addition to the mag, so we'll see if it works. I've softened my negativity a bit on the move, but still not completely sold it will work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WickedPrince In reply to sodacan [2016-08-04 21:38:34 +0000 UTC]
Well Playboy has always been more softcore than the real smut mags, so if they go more like Maxim then it could work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sodacan In reply to WickedPrince [2016-08-05 01:35:20 +0000 UTC]
I hope for the best for them. It's an iconic brand.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
artist9795 [2016-07-07 16:07:00 +0000 UTC]
Nice bunny girl waitress
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sterling557 [2016-06-14 23:56:17 +0000 UTC]
I love the bunnies. They are still the so sexy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Sterling557 In reply to Sterling557 [2016-06-16 08:01:14 +0000 UTC]
They are always welcome to stay at my place. Yay!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sodacan In reply to Sterling557 [2016-06-15 21:59:42 +0000 UTC]
Yes they are, but where will they live now that Hef sold the mansion?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
xSakuyaChan510x [2016-05-02 04:01:05 +0000 UTC]
Nice one!^^
Sexy bunny girl at your service.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
xSakuyaChan510x In reply to sodacan [2016-05-08 02:45:06 +0000 UTC]
Yep!^^
I can see her posing with a tuner car!
Then the sticker on her car will say "Rocket Bunny"!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sodacan In reply to muhu3d [2016-02-28 16:28:56 +0000 UTC]
Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Becarra [2016-02-27 14:53:08 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sodacan In reply to Becarra [2016-02-28 16:29:07 +0000 UTC]
Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Laspe [2016-02-27 05:08:58 +0000 UTC]
Very appealing work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sodacan In reply to Laspe [2016-02-27 12:59:49 +0000 UTC]
Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Laspe In reply to sodacan [2016-02-28 00:37:16 +0000 UTC]
You are welcome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
coolbazza [2016-02-27 04:23:13 +0000 UTC]
Well who couldn't see that happening in the age of the internet, I think I will run down to the newsstand to grab one just to read articles... Not!! Like Hugh its had its day and Viagra isn't going to help it..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sodacan In reply to coolbazza [2016-02-27 13:01:59 +0000 UTC]
When it came out, it out there on the edge. It's milk and cookies by today's standard.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sodacan In reply to MTLs-Imaging [2016-02-27 04:13:18 +0000 UTC]
I like it! Nice work!
Thanks for the comments!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MTLs-Imaging In reply to sodacan [2016-02-27 04:16:02 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome as always!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Morpheon [2016-02-27 02:47:18 +0000 UTC]
Playboy is a perfect example of something outliving its original purpose. Instead of going out on a high note, they're going out with a whimper and cringe-inducing stories about staph-infected hot tubs.
Great render, BTW.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sodacan In reply to Morpheon [2016-02-27 04:15:24 +0000 UTC]
I tend to agree. Like an aging boxer that keeps fighting or old quarterback going from team to team, I think it's past time for Playboy to hang it up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nephanor [2016-02-27 02:41:36 +0000 UTC]
Sadly, it will fade into insignificance.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sodacan In reply to Nephanor [2016-02-27 04:16:02 +0000 UTC]
I agree. I don't see this working.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nephanor In reply to sodacan [2016-02-27 04:30:17 +0000 UTC]
Of course, the internet beat them, it is for porn!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0