Comments: 15
Super-Fast-Tortoise [2013-08-10 23:48:36 +0000 UTC]
I like! I think it would be safe for the return ability to cost 2 manna not three cause it cost three to play and should cost 1ww to cast.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
A3Kitsune [2012-05-19 20:57:44 +0000 UTC]
Nice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
soy-monk In reply to Overlord-J [2012-03-11 22:25:23 +0000 UTC]
Why not? I think Spellshaper is a better fit than Wizard.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Overlord-J In reply to soy-monk [2012-03-11 22:53:57 +0000 UTC]
This is what you need to know about spellshaper: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
soy-monk In reply to Overlord-J [2012-03-11 23:20:14 +0000 UTC]
How about Druid? That seems to be a popular creature type for enchantresses.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JTMS [2012-03-11 20:40:48 +0000 UTC]
...That permanent doesn't untap during its controller's untap step
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
soy-monk In reply to JTMS [2012-03-11 21:19:00 +0000 UTC]
I don't think that's necessary. She already has quite a few abilities tacked on.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JTMS In reply to soy-monk [2012-03-11 21:25:48 +0000 UTC]
Perhaps, but she's also legendary. Perhaps if you added that ability and made her tap to activate her Aura retrieving one...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
soy-monk In reply to JTMS [2012-03-11 21:38:04 +0000 UTC]
If she could recur enchantments, maybe. Making it so that it's just Auras ensures that she's not too overpowered and it's not like she's automatically putting them back on the battlefield.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0