Comments: 15
Boschian-Fantasies [2010-11-10 01:54:36 +0000 UTC]
Do you the Disney company endorses child labor and hires pedophiles on the job? There was one director that worked with Disney that showed gay porno picture to a friggin 11 year old kid. Ad Disney defended the director, saying "he deserve a job too".
Disney is not as wholesome and innocent like it used to be.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TeakupFieldBerry In reply to seishin-teki [2011-04-19 22:42:54 +0000 UTC]
Disney did a TON of anti-Hitler propaganda films in WWII. Just watch "Der Fuhrer's Face" or "Education For Death."
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Boschian-Fantasies In reply to seishin-teki [2011-05-02 01:43:36 +0000 UTC]
It's okay to poke fun at everyone else, but not Jews. There are even Jewish comedians that poke fun at their own religion. Are they anti-semitic?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
seishin-teki In reply to Boschian-Fantasies [2011-05-02 03:54:01 +0000 UTC]
There's a difference between making a joke in good humor and making a joke out of spite. If I call my black friend "nigger" and he laughs and calls me "beaner", it's all fun and games, but I wouldn't go and call my black professor a nigger. If the Jewish community had to demand a joke be removed from a Disney short, it's obviously not fit for children's programming :U Context matters, my dear, and if people take that much offense, then I'd say it's better for a company like Disney--so concerned with being good ol' commercial family fun-- to be respectful and make it so that as many people as possible are comfortable watching their stuff. Whether it be Jews, Mexicans, Blacks, etc., being PC is in their best interest. Which is why your comedian example is pretty bad... not that many comedians that are concerned with not offending their audience.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TeakupFieldBerry In reply to seishin-teki [2011-04-19 23:34:15 +0000 UTC]
Wow. Good point. I'd LIKE to think that those were a result of being conditioned by the current viewpoints of the generation, but...
Man. I think Disney's come a long way. Although a lot of it is sinister, just compare Rapunzel, Belle, Tiana, and Mulan to the older Disney princesses.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Boschian-Fantasies In reply to seishin-teki [2010-11-23 00:11:29 +0000 UTC]
But kids need creepy things sometimes. Making them live in a pink saccharine bubble will ruin them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kellatrix [2010-11-04 16:31:17 +0000 UTC]
This is so true. I mean, most of them have just had their jobs ripped out from under their feet. It's so stupid.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mousinator In reply to Kellatrix [2010-11-05 04:10:34 +0000 UTC]
Er, no. It isn't true at all.
There has only been two famous former actresses that hit rock bottom, and that came from their own actions, not being discarded by Disney.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kellatrix In reply to Mousinator [2010-11-05 04:15:17 +0000 UTC]
The artist's comment, I don't necessarily agree with. My own comment had nothing to do with what they ended up doing afterwards; Disney DID discard them, no matter how successful they were afterwards.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mousinator In reply to Kellatrix [2010-11-05 04:18:29 +0000 UTC]
Nnnno, they were presented with contracts and offers from others outside the field Disney works in, and it up to them if they take them or not.
Leaving one company for another doesn't mean you are discarded. It means you move on.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0