HOME | DD

sugarpolyp β€” Tar and Cat

Published: 2010-06-27 02:20:51 +0000 UTC; Views: 1355; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 24
Redirect to original
Description Sorry, my grandma fell apart there.
Related content
Comments: 57

sugarpolyp In reply to ??? [2010-08-26 22:07:21 +0000 UTC]

That's what i was going for! Kinda.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

the-math-magician In reply to sugarpolyp [2010-08-29 17:25:29 +0000 UTC]

Either way, it's what you get.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to the-math-magician [2010-09-09 06:42:16 +0000 UTC]

Fine with me!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tengus-Nose [2010-07-21 14:02:59 +0000 UTC]

nice Lynchian portrait :0

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to Tengus-Nose [2010-07-29 01:31:59 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much! Lynch rules!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Symptomz [2010-07-02 22:40:02 +0000 UTC]

LOVE

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to Symptomz [2010-07-20 09:12:06 +0000 UTC]

THANKS BRO

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Phenylketonurics [2010-07-01 04:39:06 +0000 UTC]

Oh, grandma this is not. His thick hair and his thick wrinkles make the wonder of your value system EVEN MORE wondrous. And the little constellation string of dots cutting from bottom left to upper right totally pushes the status of this guy beyond orthodox [ha, not the religious definition, though!].

Solid achromatic work. Much respect.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to Phenylketonurics [2010-07-02 10:31:46 +0000 UTC]

Haha, your right on, it totally isn't! Its actually a director i really admire, but i always enjoy throwing in the occasional weird statement to skew the viewers perspective of what an art piece is about, or what it should be perceived as. (Not really to make a point or anything, i just find it fun)

Thank you very much! This sort of art is something that i normally dont do, so I'm glad you like it. I'm always wondering what your thinking about my current work, you have that there edumacated opinion on stuffs that you get from the schoolin' machine. The white floaty dots were actually added last minute, but i think they add a lot to the piece, they might actually be my favorite part. Either that, or the weird abstract neck/hair/tumor/thing, that was fun to throw in there.

Thanks d00d.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Phenylketonurics In reply to sugarpolyp [2010-07-05 19:11:05 +0000 UTC]

Hah, definitely my first clue.

I need to get at your recent uploads -- AND DUDE, speaking of schoolin' machine, I managed to get into a class for this fall called "The Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art". GET READY FOR SOME DEEP CRAP, YO.

Those dots really pull the composition together. It's almost like the mechanical, geometric compliment to the organic strokes shaping the character. The neck-hair-tumour-thing is great! Hah, I didn't see it that way, but let's make it a combo monster. A sentient being of its owwwwwnnn.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to Phenylketonurics [2010-08-12 21:48:24 +0000 UTC]

THIS IS A SUPER LATE RESPONSE, WOOO.

No worries man! Nice, time to bust out some totally deep metaphysical stuff! BUST A DEEP ASS FLOW. (Which sounds completely unlike what i mean it to sound like, but whatever.)

That's what i thought, honestly. After i threw those dots down i felt that it was largely complete, although obviously i could have just kept polishing that thing for alot longer if i felt like it, but larger artistic endeavors call, yanno? THE COMBO MONSTER, IT BECKONS. With its hairy neck tumors lovingly stroking the earth on which it walks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Phenylketonurics In reply to sugarpolyp [2010-08-13 07:06:04 +0000 UTC]

Haha, DEEP WHAT?! You youngsters always comin' up with these slangenmumbojumbos.

Ah, totally get what you mean there. The Zitboy comic is looking slick, if I do be so bold to say so! It's so neat to see where your focal points come from -- like, the process build is neat. Work like this piece is finished to a degree and contains just enough rawness to sell it. I likes it.

And I'm beyond creeped out at that combo monster bit. Tumors that lovingly stroke as he walks JUST PLAIN NO.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to Phenylketonurics [2010-09-09 08:58:37 +0000 UTC]

I dunno. SO GANGSTUH.

Ah, thank you very much. And cool, thank again, although admittedly i find it a bit funny that, in a sense, that middle sub-paragraph could also be worded as someone just doing the absolute bare minimum on an art piece. It sounds much more artsy and dedicated to the craft to word it in the way you did, like some artistic dogma i live by, rather than just the issue of time constraints and too many projects. regardless, thanks! I don't want to reject thecompliment or anything, and i don't disagree with you, i just thought it was fun to think about the intricacies of wording in this setting.

Hahaha, HE COMES.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Phenylketonurics In reply to sugarpolyp [2010-09-10 02:44:58 +0000 UTC]

Hahaha, that's the job of art critics! Make it wordy, poetic, and massively deep. Granted, I'm not an art critic, I like to pretend every now again. In my painting class critiques, our professor would tell us to use a critique that explained something the artist might not have intended to our advantage, even if it meant lying, ha. Yeah, ethics and personal integrity need not apply in those cases.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to Phenylketonurics [2010-09-30 00:12:20 +0000 UTC]

Well, in theory. Personally, i dig your dissections more, they seem more constructive. The idea of being EMPLOYED as an art critic i always found a bit ludicrous, but that's just me. I dig it that you know how to word your opinions properly and beautifully, but you also create artwork. I have much more respect for one who can create AND critique, rather than just create or just critique. And haha, nice! Who needs integrity in art?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TOON-2000 [2010-06-30 01:13:22 +0000 UTC]

which grandma

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to TOON-2000 [2010-07-02 10:03:16 +0000 UTC]

The one with the electric arm and the bum leg.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TOON-2000 In reply to sugarpolyp [2010-07-02 13:34:25 +0000 UTC]

k that didn't help but ok

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to TOON-2000 [2010-07-20 09:19:37 +0000 UTC]

Just think really hard about it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tripplejaz [2010-06-29 16:47:46 +0000 UTC]

Your stuff is looking really good Lars

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to tripplejaz [2010-07-02 10:03:01 +0000 UTC]

Oh thanks man!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

usernamedesired [2010-06-28 17:37:18 +0000 UTC]

This reminds me of Eraserhead, which is super groovy. The neck is especially fabulous. Nice!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to usernamedesired [2010-07-02 10:02:53 +0000 UTC]

This is actually a drawing/portrait/abstract painting/whatever/ of the director of Eraserhead during an interview about the film, so that's cool that you figured that out somehow.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lee-Sunsun [2010-06-28 16:30:56 +0000 UTC]

It reminds me of Don Knotts, for some reason. But it is freaking awesome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to Lee-Sunsun [2010-07-02 10:00:53 +0000 UTC]

No idea who that is, but thanks, hahaha!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Leader1138 [2010-06-28 00:32:53 +0000 UTC]

Oh God, that DVD commentary...

Like a perfect fusion of tar... and cat...

And I'm still confused about all of those Woody Woodpecker dolls.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to Leader1138 [2010-07-02 10:00:41 +0000 UTC]

YES, FINALLY SOMEONE UNDERSTANDS THIS FULL REFERENCE. I'm proud of you.

I loved that DVD interview. I strive to be as productive/ interesting as lynch someday.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Wiiporter [2010-06-27 19:16:14 +0000 UTC]

get a haircut

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to Wiiporter [2010-07-02 09:59:39 +0000 UTC]

I'll be sure to tell him if i ever meet him.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

InternetGhostPig [2010-06-27 09:00:40 +0000 UTC]

You can practically see the line shlooping all over the place. THERE GOES MY PERCEPTION OF REALITY.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to InternetGhostPig [2010-07-02 10:26:55 +0000 UTC]

Hahaha, AWESOME! I like the idea of the texture of the "paint" being inseparable from the actual image. TRUE REALISM IS FOR POSERS, MAN, I'M TOTALLY DEEP.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

InternetGhostPig In reply to sugarpolyp [2010-07-02 20:37:49 +0000 UTC]

It totally works too, dudeface. YOU ARE THE ABYSS WOOOAH.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to InternetGhostPig [2010-07-20 09:31:27 +0000 UTC]

I AM THE DARKNESS AM I COOL NOW

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Goretoon [2010-06-27 06:13:07 +0000 UTC]

sooo cool!! man!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to Goretoon [2010-07-02 09:59:25 +0000 UTC]

Oh man, thanks! Honestly I'm a bit surprised you dig this one, but I'm totally glad!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NUMBERJUAN [2010-06-27 04:21:48 +0000 UTC]

hasha I thought this was David Lynch...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to NUMBERJUAN [2010-06-27 05:02:04 +0000 UTC]

Β‘It is David Lynch!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

NUMBERJUAN In reply to sugarpolyp [2010-06-27 18:58:59 +0000 UTC]

thats what i thought gangstah

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to NUMBERJUAN [2010-07-02 09:49:25 +0000 UTC]

Β‘Si!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

myscreame [2010-06-27 03:27:05 +0000 UTC]

HELL YEAH, this is simply beautiful.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to myscreame [2010-07-02 09:58:15 +0000 UTC]

Oh man, thanks! Haha!

CIRCE, WAZZAP?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

myscreame In reply to sugarpolyp [2010-07-02 19:26:56 +0000 UTC]

NOTHING MUCH. haha.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to myscreame [2010-07-20 09:22:47 +0000 UTC]

I refuse, elaborate.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kamaelion [2010-06-27 03:16:14 +0000 UTC]

Isss it really that time again? It sseemsss asss if you only just arrived. You've done a great deal in a ssmall time sspan.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to Kamaelion [2010-07-02 09:58:43 +0000 UTC]

I really like these lines, but i demand an explanation. I have a hunch, but i want to confirm the context.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kamaelion In reply to sugarpolyp [2010-07-02 15:56:49 +0000 UTC]

Doctor Freeemaaan. I realize thisss mom-ent may not be the most con-ven-ient for a 'heart-to-heart', but, I had to wait until your... 'friends' were otherwisse occupied. Hm?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to Kamaelion [2010-07-20 09:33:36 +0000 UTC]

Never played Half-Life/Half-Life 2, but i know the reference well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kamaelion In reply to sugarpolyp [2010-07-20 16:25:13 +0000 UTC]

Well, it is a fun game, but rather wish they just finish it already

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sugarpolyp In reply to Kamaelion [2010-08-09 17:59:25 +0000 UTC]

Ha, i know what you mean.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kamaelion In reply to sugarpolyp [2010-08-09 21:55:50 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I suppose any body who has been waiting for something for a while would.

YOu never answered my question, though

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>