Comments: 62
Synnic In reply to ??? [2012-03-02 06:09:44 +0000 UTC]
Thanks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Synnic In reply to Snapperz [2012-02-29 03:25:23 +0000 UTC]
Thank you. I'm glad you enjoyed it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tzryylon5 [2012-02-27 06:50:20 +0000 UTC]
Aha! You wrote this in Celtx, didn't you! How'd you manage to upload it to Deviantart? I can't seem to get my Celtx files to load...
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Tzryylon5 In reply to Snapperz [2012-02-27 17:59:42 +0000 UTC]
Ah... yes, I could do that too, couldn't I... heh heh...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Synnic In reply to Tzryylon5 [2012-02-27 07:47:36 +0000 UTC]
Sorry, I actually wrote it in WordPad on my Windows PC. The formatting was all done manually. In fact, it's the first screenplay I've done.
Although, A quick web search found that there is a Celtx wiki. You might try this [link] and see if it helps.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tzryylon5 In reply to Synnic [2012-02-27 20:21:51 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! Wow... that was unbelievably easy... You saved me a lot of headache, Synnic. Thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Synnic In reply to Tzryylon5 [2012-02-28 00:43:35 +0000 UTC]
Glad I could help.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Synnic In reply to LadyofGaerdon [2012-02-27 06:09:57 +0000 UTC]
So it would seem. I have gotten some great ideas that way.
Hehehe. Maybe she is at that.
Thanks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rhydal [2012-02-27 03:42:53 +0000 UTC]
Very interesting script. I could see it all play out in my head clearly. I had to reread that part where they switched roles- very clever. Thank you for writing this!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Synnic In reply to Rhydal [2012-02-27 06:37:36 +0000 UTC]
Thank you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Synnic In reply to chillgirl101 [2012-02-27 01:17:40 +0000 UTC]
It certainly is. Thank you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
XxbreathsmusicxX [2012-02-26 23:26:49 +0000 UTC]
wow I find this absolutely brilliant. always good to come across such an interesting bit of writing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheDibLuver [2012-02-26 21:36:08 +0000 UTC]
I did like the story but I was generally without a sense of direction for some reason. I felt confused.. I think it was due to the fact I didn't get a good sense of the character, of the 'we' mentioned in the story and I was overly focused on the prisoners.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Synnic In reply to TheDibLuver [2012-02-26 22:27:37 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. I'm glad you liked it. I can see where some of the conventions might be a bit confusing. Hopefully, this explanation will help.
The we in the non-indented parts means the audience/behind the camera and it is not part of the story itself. It's a technique intended to describe a point of view without encumbering the script with detailed camera direction that in a film is the job of the Director of Photography. This is the same technique that's used in the script for the movie Blade Runner. [link] is a pretty good intro video that explains some of the basics of script writing. Also, have a look at [link] for an explanation of script formatting.
If you still find yourself a little confused after looking this over, please let me know specifics and I will try to either further explain or look at ways I might improve the script to be clearer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheDibLuver In reply to Synnic [2012-02-26 22:54:33 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! I really don't have much knowledge in the way of scripts and that's most likley why I was lost in some places. Grats on your DD!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dalipep [2012-02-26 21:07:24 +0000 UTC]
What is this? I dont think this is good enough for thew DD. Sorry, but thats what I think. I go to art college so i DO know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Dalipep In reply to BeccaJS [2012-02-26 22:49:17 +0000 UTC]
Good point, nigga. I stand corrected. peace
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Synnic In reply to Dalipep [2012-02-26 22:01:48 +0000 UTC]
Honestly, I was surprised to see that I had gotten a DD. I had no idea it was coming.
Is it just that you don't like the subject or do you see flaws in execution? I'm always looking to improve my writing. If it is flawed execution and you'd care to go into specifics about what you think could be better, I'd love to know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vanshira In reply to Synnic [2012-02-27 02:37:55 +0000 UTC]
I think his problem is that he dislikes it and he goes to art school, which automatically grants his opinions extra weight.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Synnic In reply to Vanshira [2012-02-29 06:30:10 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for your support, Vanshira.
I do try to give people the benefit of the doubt, even when they communicate poorly. I can understand that someone may have a negative emotional reaction to a piece, or even just find the idea to be something that bothers them. I'm genuinely interested in the answers to the question why, but judging by the lack of response to a sincere overture, I'm just going to have to chalk this one up to trolling and move on.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Synnic In reply to Vanshira [2012-03-04 18:31:08 +0000 UTC]
True, that's often the case. On occasion though, I have changed attitudes just by being willing to open a dialog.
While this person's profile as a self-proclaimed expert combined with bad grammar probably indicates a very closed mind, there's no cost to me to being civil and willing to listen. Once in a while, the results are quite startling and I find those times make it worth it. Plus, I always have the choice of "walking away" if things get unpleasant, especially online.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vanshira In reply to Synnic [2012-03-05 03:57:23 +0000 UTC]
True enough, true enough.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SalHunter [2012-02-26 21:02:10 +0000 UTC]
Reminds me so much of Tery Gilliam's film "Brazil" a fantastic script!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Synnic In reply to SalHunter [2012-02-26 21:58:24 +0000 UTC]
Thank you. I love Brazil and that it reminded you of such a great work is truly flattering.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WillieManga [2012-02-26 18:28:59 +0000 UTC]
Wow, Jack is pretty psycologically intelegent! "Pulled a Bugs Bunny." Great work on the DD!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Synnic In reply to Euxiom [2012-02-26 21:57:03 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much. I love that you recognized that as one of the sources that inspired this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SteffenC-itsjustme [2012-02-26 14:34:24 +0000 UTC]
Definately 1984ish, and that's something!
Also, I love the narrative style, very intriquing way of letting the reader/viewer know how the scene is set, how we follow the main character and so forth. Very interesting indeed!
And I love that the idea evolved from a typo!! Just goes to show that there's no such thing as making a mistake, not if you put it to good use ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Synnic In reply to SteffenC-itsjustme [2012-02-26 21:55:52 +0000 UTC]
Thank you.
I started researching how to do short film scripts and found a site that pointed me in the right direction for formatting. Later, I remembered that among my collectibles I have a copy of the script for the movie Blade Runner. I adopted the technique from that.
Definitely, inspiration can strike anywhere if you keep yourself open to it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SteffenC-itsjustme In reply to Synnic [2012-02-26 22:46:12 +0000 UTC]
I think that's so cool, when one medium inspires an artist working in another medium to use it for something creative.
Yeah, and this time it really worked! (:
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
rockerjase [2012-02-26 13:18:59 +0000 UTC]
bloody hell, thats both awesome and completely fucked up at the same time
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StandingCat [2012-02-26 13:12:59 +0000 UTC]
I can't believe all this originated from a typo! That, my friend, is amazing writing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rafun1312 [2012-02-26 11:39:02 +0000 UTC]
Scary! But I like it. One small thing: When talking to his recorder, Overton calls the subject 942. After that it's subject 924. Is that a typo, or does he have several prisoners to deal with?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>