HOME | DD

T-PEKC β€” Lythronax argestes

Published: 2013-11-10 15:46:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 7966; Favourites: 191; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Reconstruction of the newly described tyrannosaurin tyrannosaurid Lythronax argestes, a.k.a The Gore King.


Medium: Ink

Done: 2013


Reference: Loewen, M. A., R. B. Irmis, J. J. W. Sertich, P. J. Currie, S. D. Sampson. 2013. Tyrant Dinosaur Evolution Tracks the Rise and Fall of Late Cretaceous Oceans.- PLoS ONE, 11 (8): e79420. (in particular skeletal and skull reconstructions ofΒ Lythronax argestesΒ done respectively by Scott Hartman and Lukas Panzarin)

Related content
Comments: 43

tpallier [2017-02-26 09:44:40 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful artwork - with loads of fabulous detail

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to tpallier [2017-02-26 17:40:20 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tarturus [2013-11-11 23:36:38 +0000 UTC]

Cool pic. ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to Tarturus [2013-11-13 21:25:32 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Neranella [2013-11-11 05:51:13 +0000 UTC]

Fabulous ! He looks almost real !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to Neranella [2013-11-13 21:25:25 +0000 UTC]

Mission completed!


Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Neranella In reply to T-PEKC [2013-11-14 05:48:59 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

electreel [2013-11-11 01:18:18 +0000 UTC]

Very nice rendition!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to electreel [2013-11-13 21:25:05 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Hyrotrioskjan [2013-11-11 00:54:53 +0000 UTC]

Well, that was fast, but it's beautiful, I also noted the a bit big head like some others but it's still awesome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to Hyrotrioskjan [2013-11-13 21:24:42 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, as always! Seems like everybody notes the head.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Hyrotrioskjan In reply to T-PEKC [2013-11-13 23:59:18 +0000 UTC]

No problem, hope the head is not too heavy for you now

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kazuma27 [2013-11-10 22:18:25 +0000 UTC]

Really good, yet there's something which doesn't look quite right, IMHO... Maybe it's the slightly too gracile ankles, or maybe i'm just tired and i see things!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to Kazuma27 [2013-11-13 21:24:00 +0000 UTC]

The head, it's the head, as others have already noted. Ankles are fine. Theropods have gracile ankles.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DinoBirdMan [2013-11-10 21:32:13 +0000 UTC]

Cool!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to DinoBirdMan [2013-11-13 21:22:26 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DinoBirdMan In reply to T-PEKC [2013-11-14 00:00:11 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

gennarovolpe [2013-11-10 19:57:44 +0000 UTC]

very good job!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to gennarovolpe [2013-11-13 21:22:18 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

guilmon182 [2013-11-10 19:54:10 +0000 UTC]

I was waiting for your restoration, and you did not disappoint! I freakin' LOVE this dinosaur! Oh, and Lythronax in JP and all that.


πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to guilmon182 [2013-11-13 21:20:56 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, man! It's indeed really cool dinosaur.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

pilsator [2013-11-10 19:50:23 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful! Great to see your take on the gore king.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to pilsator [2013-11-13 21:20:30 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, Pils! Maybe not as good as yours, but still worth the look.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EWilloughby [2013-11-10 19:17:47 +0000 UTC]

I also get the sense that the head might be a little too big, but it could be a perspective thing. In any case, the detail in this one is particularly good - I like the really clear distinction between naked skin (on the body) and legitimate scales on the face.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to EWilloughby [2013-11-13 21:19:40 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for the thoughtful comment, Emily!


The head may be too big indeed, but I think part of the problem is in the neck instead. It's kind of too long. I tried to follow head proportions of Hartman's skeletal drawing, which has bigger head proportionally, than Atuchin official reconstructions. Of course the perspective is a major problem for me, and you may be on the right track here.


I pay extra attention on textures, and try to improve them through the series. So far the results are variable. But with this drawing, I'm proud of the texturing, and detail.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheMorlock [2013-11-10 18:32:06 +0000 UTC]

Reminds me of a McLoughlin illustration.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to TheMorlock [2013-11-13 21:09:01 +0000 UTC]

Heh, that's one artist my art hasn't compared to yet. Although I think that similarities end with the used medium. Anyway, thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheMorlock In reply to T-PEKC [2013-11-13 23:17:46 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Dennonyx [2013-11-10 18:15:44 +0000 UTC]

Loveable but is not the head maybe a little too big?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to Dennonyx [2013-11-13 21:07:22 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!


Yes, most probably it is, but not much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SomeKindaSpy [2013-11-10 17:11:01 +0000 UTC]

I love it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to SomeKindaSpy [2013-11-13 21:05:35 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Yutyrannus [2013-11-10 17:09:50 +0000 UTC]

Nice! One of the best yet! Which tyrannosaur is next? Bistahieversor? Dryptosaurus?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to Yutyrannus [2013-11-13 21:05:22 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!


Dryptosaurus is not tyrannosaurid, but tyrannosauroid, thus it's not part of the series. If you browse through my gallery though, you will see that I've already drawn Dryptosaurus. Just check it out.


The next one is Bistahieversor. The artwork is done, but it will be uploaded in about 12 hours.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Yutyrannus In reply to T-PEKC [2013-11-13 22:19:22 +0000 UTC]

Oh, I thought you were doing tyrannosauroids too. But yeah, I'll definately check out your old one. Can't wait for the Bistahieversor!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ShinRedDear [2013-11-10 16:32:51 +0000 UTC]

I guess it is perspective but the head looks quite huge ! But I really like the 3-dimensional approach and it's gracile legs. I really should do my own rendition now !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to ShinRedDear [2013-11-13 21:02:11 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, I see what you mean about the head, but I don't what to say... at first I thought it was normal, and I'm still inclined to this. Maybe the neck is tad longer than it should, thus messing up proportions. I must notice though that there is quite a difference in animal proportions between Hartman's skeletal drawing and Atuchin's reconstructions. Hartman's work shows an animal with proportionally bigger head than that of Atuchin. Mine is indeed a bit off, but still close to Hartman's reconstruction, IMO.


As for your rendition I can only say: Do it! ... Do it! ... DO IT! ... NOW!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ShinRedDear In reply to T-PEKC [2013-11-13 22:17:36 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for your explanation. Now, I do see the proportional differences between
Atuchin's and Hartman's depictions.

Speaking of my version, I still have to do a complete one but you already can see a portrait
of the new genus in my portrait series: shinreddear.deviantart.com/art…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Koeskull [2013-11-10 16:11:56 +0000 UTC]

Awesome. I love the texture, especially on the head. Interesting how it doesn't have scales like what I normally see.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to Koeskull [2013-11-13 20:50:00 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!


I'm trying to make my dinosaurs different, yet still following the paleontological evidence. Glad to know I succed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ZombieSaurian [2013-11-10 15:53:51 +0000 UTC]

Fricken' awesome! Love the way you posed the head!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

T-PEKC In reply to ZombieSaurian [2013-11-13 20:48:27 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, man! The head was a challenge, and I'm quite happy with it. Unfortunately, as I see from other comments, the head is not as good proportionally as it should be.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ZombieSaurian In reply to T-PEKC [2013-11-13 20:54:51 +0000 UTC]

Np, but yes, it seems a tad too big

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0